Yet again, your double standards is non-sensical. Your differentiation between those clubs make zero sense, we could've qualified straight out if we played a strong team against young boys at Anfield, we did not, and subsequently drew that game, yet in your eyes, apparently that is not disrespecting the competition.
Whereas Bolton, Villa, Stoke, for whatever reason, prioritized their league games over Europa Cup ties, the same way we do, yet they are disrespecting it. You are going completely bonkers on this one
The only one who continually miss the point is you, you keep going on about disrespecting the competition, yet your criteria for what constitutes "disrespect" is stupid at best.
And here's another thing you don't understand and missed continually: not many clubs can cope with midweek and weekend games, they don't have the squad, so they have to prioritize. They chose the games they see as having the least incentive to start their best players in order to better prepare themselves for the more important games. If they go the other way and prioritize Europa league over the domestic league, they'd still have to rest players for the league (like we did in 2005, I already mentioned that many times). They would be disrespecting SOMETHING, and you'd be outraged over it either way.
Unless your criteria for disrespect isn't based purely on weakened teams, which would just be idiotic coz it appears your idea of disrespect really is cluster*
You're going on about money, you're mixing issues, that's about CL spot over Europa. Clubs' squad management for different competitions is a different issue here, many clubs simply cannot continually field strong sides to compete on all fronts in mid week and weekends, something you continually ignore. And I know what you're gonna say, you're gonna ride your high horse and say, footballers who get paid gazillion should be able to handle playing whenever, wherever, however many. And I'm here to tell you welcome to the ******* club, welcome to reality, that just doesn't happen
Whereas Bolton, Villa, Stoke, for whatever reason, prioritized their league games over Europa Cup ties, the same way we do, yet they are disrespecting it. You are going completely bonkers on this one
The only one who continually miss the point is you, you keep going on about disrespecting the competition, yet your criteria for what constitutes "disrespect" is stupid at best.
And here's another thing you don't understand and missed continually: not many clubs can cope with midweek and weekend games, they don't have the squad, so they have to prioritize. They chose the games they see as having the least incentive to start their best players in order to better prepare themselves for the more important games. If they go the other way and prioritize Europa league over the domestic league, they'd still have to rest players for the league (like we did in 2005, I already mentioned that many times). They would be disrespecting SOMETHING, and you'd be outraged over it either way.
Unless your criteria for disrespect isn't based purely on weakened teams, which would just be idiotic coz it appears your idea of disrespect really is cluster*
You're going on about money, you're mixing issues, that's about CL spot over Europa. Clubs' squad management for different competitions is a different issue here, many clubs simply cannot continually field strong sides to compete on all fronts in mid week and weekends, something you continually ignore. And I know what you're gonna say, you're gonna ride your high horse and say, footballers who get paid gazillion should be able to handle playing whenever, wherever, however many. And I'm here to tell you welcome to the ******* club, welcome to reality, that just doesn't happen