Size up the trade value of your list

[God Save Max King]

If Ryan Griffen isn't worth a top five pick I don't know who is.

Someone who isn't turning 29 next season?

 

[goodie23]

I'd trade two top 5 draft picks for Cameron, at any club

Problem with doing something like that is getting the second draft pick, unless a free agent leaves and you get lucky with compo

 

[Collingwoodity]

I will do who I would trade our first rounder for ( likely to be about 8)

Adelaide

Dangerfield
Talia
Douglas

Brisbane

Rockliff

Carlton

Murphy
Simpson

Essendon

Hepell
Watson
Daniher
Carlisle

Freo

Fyfe
Mundy
Johnson

Geelong

Johnson
Selwood
Taylor
Hawkins
Motlop

GWS

Whitfield
Treloar
Cameron
Patton
Boyd
Davis

GC

Ablett
Swallow
Prestia
Lynch
Thompson

Hawks

Gunston
Roughead
Smith
Mitchell
Birchall

Melbourne

Hogan
Viney
Tyson

NM

Swallow
Dal Santo
Wells
Thompson

Power

Wines
Wingard
Boak
Trengove

saints

Dunstan
Steven
Hickey

Swans

Hannabery
Jack
Kennedy
Franklin
Tippet

WC

Shuey
Natanui
Kennedy
Darling
Masten
Selwood

WB

Griffen
Libba
Crameri
Mcrae

Ones bolded would give away top 5 pick for.

No one from the pies?

 

[thetradesman]

Oops!!

Pendles
Beams
Side bottom

 

[Super Hans]

Someone who isn't turning 29 next season?

A top five midfielder in the league in his prime would comand a top five pick.

 

[God Save Max King]

A top five midfielder in the league in his prime would comand a top five pick.

Of course. But he's exiting his prime. Last year going into this year, or the year before that, he would definitely be worth a top 5 pick, but I'd say he's in that 5-10 range now. A side would probably only get 3 years out of him.

 

[HeHateMe]

We would want a top 5 pick for Vlastuin, just saying that he would be a regular 22 player at the hawks for sure.

Duryea, Cheney, Shiels, Langford, Spangher

Duryea is not best 22 (well not yet, 20-27 range) and is a better kick then Vlastuin (often kicks out from full back) arguably Vlastuin might be ahead.

Cheney is playing FB relief. Vlastuin can not play FB.

Shiels is a batter player then Vlastuin right now. your bias is clouding your judgment here.

Langford is a close one, is playing a tagging role in the midfield that I could see Vlastuin covering. But again Langford is not best 22 yet (20-25)

Spangher see Cheney.

I would love Vlastuin at Hawthorn but it would be hard to squeeze him in to our best 22 but would be in the same bracket as Anderson, Hallahan, Langford, Duryea, Cheney, Wanganeen, Litherland and Spangher.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

 

[Ambrosia]

We would want a top 5 pick for Vlastuin, just saying that he would be a regular 22 player at the hawks for sure.

What Richmond would want isn't really what the thread is asking though. I agree Richmond wouldn't consider giving Vlastuin away unless it was for a top 5 pick but that doesn't mean Vlastuin is worth that much.

 

[Winter]

Here's my go for North Melbourne

> Pick 1
None

Picks 1-3
None

Picks 4-10
A. Swallow
S. Thompson
J. Ziebell
B. Cunnington
A. Black
L. McDonald

Picks 11-20
D. Wells
L. Thomas
T. Goldstein
R. Bastinac
S. Atley

Picks 21-35
B. Harvey
N. Dal Santo
D. Petrie
L. Hansen
L. Adams
J. Macmillan
A. Mullett
B. McKenzie
M. Daw
C. Delaney
T. Garner
T. Dumont
M. Wood

Picks 36-60
N. Grima
L. Greenwood
K. Harper
S. Gibson
R. Tarrant

Picks 61-90
S. Wright
S. McMahon
B. Jacobs
D. Currie
J. Tippet

Picks 90+
M. Firrito
R. Nahas
L. Anthony
T. Hine
B. Brown
T. Curran
M. Wilkins

 

[Ambrosia]

I'd say Goldstein is worth a top 10 pick.

 

[Daz]

Hansen and Mullett absolutely in the 11-20 range.

And FWIW, if Ziebell/Cunnington entered a national draft now, they'd definitely be taken in the top 3.

 

[Ambrosia]

Hansen and Mullett absolutely in the 11-20 range.

And FWIW, if Ziebell/Cunnington entered a national draft now, they'd definitely be taken in the top 3.

Agree on Cunnington. I think Ziebell got a bit to work on to be worth a top 3 pick.

 

[Tragic sainter]

Hansen and Mullett absolutely in the 11-20 range.

And FWIW, if Ziebell/Cunnington entered a national draft now, they'd definitely be taken in the top 3.

No way ziebell is worth a top three pick. What has he actually done?

 

[Daz]

No way ziebell is worth a top three pick. What has he actually done?

Looked pretty bloody good last year. No way you'd take an untried midfielder at pick 3 instead of him.

 

[Tragic sainter]

Looked pretty bloody good last year. No way you'd take an untried midfielder at pick 3 instead of him.

Say we traded him for a top three pick this year and it was an uncompromised draft. You would be trading out one of jack Martin, Tom Boyd, or Jesse hogan for jack ziebell. Don't think so mate.

 

[El_Scorcho]

If you had pick 3 and you picked up a player who ended up being as good as Ziebell, you'd be satisfied.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk

 

[thetradesman]

If you had pick 3 and you picked up a player who ended up being as good as Ziebell, you'd be satisfied.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk

I wouldn't

 

[thetradesman]

Duryea is not best 22 (well not yet, 20-27 range) and is a better kick then Vlastuin (often kicks out from full back) arguably Vlastuin might be ahead.

Cheney is playing FB relief. Vlastuin can not play FB.

Shiels is a batter player then Vlastuin right now. your bias is clouding your judgment here.

Langford is a close one, is playing a tagging role in the midfield that I could see Vlastuin covering. But again Langford is not best 22 yet (20-25)

Spangher see Cheney.

I would love Vlastuin at Hawthorn but it would be hard to squeeze him in to our best 22 but would be in the same bracket as Anderson, Hallahan, Langford, Duryea, Cheney, Wanganeen, Litherland and Spangher.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Shields? Hahaha!

 

[Stratton_Gun]

Shields? Hahaha!

No, Shiels

 

[thetradesman]

No, Shiels

Oops!

Vlastuin is 100 times the player Shiels will ever be.

 

[GutsyBug]

Oops!

Vlastuin is 100 times the player Shiels will ever be.

Shiels is better than Vlastuin, no question.

 

[Stratton_Gun]

Oops!

Vlastuin is 100 times the player Shiels will ever be.

 

[Dannnnnnnnnn]

Oops!

Vlastuin is 100 times the player Shiels will ever be.

Shiels has played as a tagger the past few seasons to develop other parts of his game and as a consequence of being in a strong team. However, Langford has taken that role now, freeing Shiels up. His season to date has been brilliant and a big reason for Hawthorn's unbeatable form despite missing key players. I rate Vlastuin but Shiels is a much more complete player at this stage.

 

[El_Scorcho]

I wouldn't

In fairness he's probably not enough of a frontrunner to be worthy of a Richmond top pick.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Oops!

Vlastuin is 100 times the player Shiels will ever be.

LOL.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2