ClarkeM
Wonders 🏆🏆🏆🏆
- Mar 14, 2007
- 53,898
- 50,518
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
CrowwyWho is the Swamp Donkeys?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CrowwyWho is the Swamp Donkeys?
Lol.For tonight clearly Richmond by UNDER 39.5 points
Lol.
Tipped them by 51.
All hail the Margin King.
I said all hail the Margin King!!!Margin King? you were still off by more than I was. I was only 4 points off.
Under 39 points is a haphazard guess with a large scope to work with. Since you had 39 numbers to work with, I'd say young Ando has your measure.Margin King? you were still off by more than I was. I was only 4 points off.
Under 39 points is a haphazard guess with a large scope to work with. Since you had 39 numbers to work with, I'd say young Ando has your measure.
Yea, na. You were incorrect, thus Ando was closer with his prediction.I said Under 39.5 points and was only out by 3.5 points so really 4 points. 39.5 is closer to 43 than 51 is. And I did state my tips would be based on Under or Over 39.5 points margin.
Hey, BoshtrichBurger - you know how you are 816 in RDT (totally frigging awesome btw) and you are scared of falling from those lofty heights? Try being 30th in Fantasy before this week started.
I said under 51.I said Under 39.5 points and was only out by 3.5 points so really 4 points. 39.5 is closer to 43 than 51 is. And I did state my tips would be based on Under or Over 39.5 points margin.
Lol.
Tipped them by 51.
All hail the Margin King.
You didn't exactly tip Richmond by 39, did you?I said Under 39.5 points and was only out by 3.5 points so really 4 points. 39.5 is closer to 43 than 51 is. And I did state my tips would be based on Under or Over 39.5 points margin.
Sounds like something Mobbs would enjoy MobbenfuhrerI don't know how many of you will be interested by this but it's really a fascinating read. I stumbled across this article from the New York Times in 1910 talking about Australian Football. May need to zoom in
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9F07EED61239E433A25750C2A9669D946196D6CF
You didn't exactly tip Richmond by 39, did you?
Would be pretty silly taking Richmond by under 40 if so.
Yeah nah, when I do my tips (not for tipping competitions) I check out the betting side of things and thus use the under and over 39.5 option. So not bad, I was only off by 1 kick.
In essence you've gone and blown your cash. The margin you selected was incorrect. Why do you insist on arguing the point, they won by 43, not under 39.5.Yeah nah, when I do my tips (not for tipping competitions) I check out the betting side of things and thus use the under and over 39.5 option. So not bad, I was only off by 1 kick.
You were actually off by about 43 points.Yeah nah, when I do my tips (not for tipping competitions) I check out the betting side of things and thus use the under and over 39.5 option. So not bad, I was only off by 1 kick.
In essence you've gone and blown your cash. The margin you selected was incorrect. Why do you insist on arguing the point, they won by 43, not under 39.5.
Sounds like something Mobbs would enjoy Mobbenfuhrer
You were actually off by about 43 points.
I tipped Richmond. There was no line. So I'm 100% right and you are 100% wrong.