No Oppo Supporters The ASADA Thread... from a Tiger perspective

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
He is also set to argue the ACC was guilty of publicly releasing text messages found on the phones of the players.

These messages suggest his 2012 supplements program had been run in an ad hoc manner and without spread sheets and documentation - something Dank rejects.

Dank, however, no longer has detailed documents outlining what the players were injected with, maintaining these were erased under the watch of the club's former administration.


http://www.canberratimes.com.au/afl...names-of-the-essendon-34-20160202-gmjigs.html
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Just read about the Dyson Heppel thing.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...call-on-dyson-heppells-essendon-sponsor-tweet

Just further proof that when left to their own devices, the AFL are spineless. Utterly spineless. It should be standard practice that once a player is suspended, the advertiser is allowed to review the contract (you'd think that would be part of the contract from the company!) and that all interactions must be also suspended while the player is not a representative of the AFL.

If the advertiser chooses to honor the agreement and engage the deal once the player is back on the playing list, so be it.

SunshineTiger said:
The lawsuits are coming

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...split-ahead-of-compo-bid-20160203-gmkv19.html
Click to expand...

bloody hell, isn't that like a drunk driver suing Fosters?
 
Spagman said:
Just read about the Dyson Heppel thing.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...call-on-dyson-heppells-essendon-sponsor-tweet

Just further proof that when left to their own devices, the AFL are spineless. Utterly spineless. It should be standard practice that once a player is suspended, the advertiser is allowed to review the contract (you'd think that would be part of the contract from the company!) and that all interactions must be also suspended while the player is not a representative of the AFL.

If the advertiser chooses to honor the agreement and engage the deal once the player is back on the playing list, so be it.



bloody hell, isn't that like a drunk driver suing Fosters?
Click to expand...


the protection of convicted drug cheats by the AFL has a UCI ring about it similar to Lance Armstrong being protected by the UCI before USADA outed him.

the UCI is a disgraced organization which had wholesale changes after Armstrong, the AFL needs wholesale changes to its administration after Essendon.

thre will be no clear air until that happens, FIFA 9s going through this at the moment, but after all we are little aussie battlers who can do no wrong.
 
Francis Leech said basically the same thing on SEN this morning. It just hits you right between the eyes when you hear it like that- they basically tried to cover up and manage this whole affair for their best interests instead of condemning convicted drug cheats. The rest of the world (apart from the big US Sports) abide by the WADA code, why are the AFL even considering anything else?
 
This lawsuit by the bumber players (stupid...double dipping) may set a precedent where players will legally challenge the AFL'S definition of free agency...
AFL tried to protect its brand in the bumbers drug scandal and may have opened up a bigger can of worms..
Suck a big one AFL..
 
Tiger Toffee said:
If he gets to keep it and comes back in 2017, he will be booed out of every stadium in Australia and it will get to him and he will retire mid season in disgrace. As soon as the appeal date is passed ( feb 10 ) the AFL should be stripping him of it no questions asked.
Click to expand...

we wont be allowed to boo him....see adam goodes.

he wont come back next year, he will get his payout from the OFFAL and a cushy job next to daddy at 7
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

JAKLAUGHING said:
This lawsuit by the bumber players (stupid...double dipping) may set a precedent where players will legally challenge the AFL'S definition of free agency...
AFL tried to protect its brand in the bumbers drug scandal and may have opened up a bigger can of worms..
Suck a big one AFL..
Click to expand...


the lawsuits wont be for PEDs it will be for unsafe work practices which the club has been convicted off, the club will try and say the players knew but in common law that's irrelevant.
 
JAKLAUGHING said:
The AFL will subsidize the EFC in the players lawsuit...guaranteed...
Click to expand...
Then there will be problems from other clubs. No way am I putting money into Richmond for it then go to pay those campaigners off.
 
Nostradumbass said:
Then there will be problems from other clubs. No way am I putting money into Richmond for it then go to pay those campaigners off.
Click to expand...

put your money where your mouth is, I tagged the club with my comment:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Tiger_Of_Old
Top 10 Tigers Of The 21st Century
Replies
5
Views
349
JAKLAUGHING
JAKLAUGHING
THE THIN MAN
Opinion Club by club: How Richmond coach Adem Yze can ensure Tigers don’t ‘get stuck in the past’
Replies
20
Views
2K
db26
db26
Roachy8
No more Tiger creche...
Replies
22
Views
1K
guruisatiger
guruisatiger
SA_Tiger11
Which two players from another club?
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
Truetiger
Truetiger
biaseddustyfan
  • Locked
Game Day Tigers v Blues Rd1 at the G
44 45 46 47 48
Replies
1K
Views
13K
Charlie Pannam
Charlie Pannam
domus
I thought some Tiger fans might enjoy this colour footage of the 1973 Grand Final.
Replies
6
Views
407
Groupie_
Groupie_
AllHart
Trent & Jack's farewell game - game day scenes and after match tributes to our legends filmed from the Punt Road end
Replies
3
Views
483
AllHart
AllHart

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top