- May 10, 2004
- 24,853
- 5,687
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Pistons/Hammers/Sri Lanka/The Exers
I believe at least one person had Lauren Hill, another 'famous for having cancer' selection. She passed away early this morning
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
kane249I believe at least one person had Lauren Hill, another 'famous for having cancer' selection. She passed away early this morning
I'm astounded these ones count. Not that I'm complaining, or accusing anyone of cheating... I just don't consider these types 'genuine' celebrities. Even Kim Kardashian has done more than die to be famous.I believe at least one person had Lauren Hill, another 'famous for having cancer' selection. She passed away early this morning
I believe at least one person had Lauren Hill, another 'famous for having cancer' selection. She passed away early this morning
I knew a girl a few years below me in high school. Finished Year 12 with flying colours but between then and the end of the year found out she had cancer. She didn't see out the following year.What a waste only 19
Pffft. Where's your competitive spirit?Yeah I'm not going to keep playing this game in the future. I'm just not going to go to the effort of trolling the net for semi famous young people that are knocking on deaths door. If that's the way the game is going to be played I don't want any part of it.
Pffft. Where's your competitive spirit?
You're playing a game based on death and suddenly morals have a part to play?
Minor celebs with cancer? Or minor celebs who are celebs because they got cancer?Minor celebs with cancer should just be void.
Tessa James is the girl i'm talking about above.
And to me the Wikipedia rule works well to make this happen. And there's no grey areas. I agree with the last line, but it leaves a massive grey area. I am happy to partake in this game, but it would start to feel a little disrespectful if it broke out into all out debate over who is and who isn't eligible. If the rules are clear (which they are at the moment) as to who is eligible than those sort of disputes can be resolved very quickly.To me it needs to be somebody that people have heard of.
If 99% of people are going to say "Who?" then it shouldn't count.
And to me the Wikipedia rule works well to make this happen. And there's no grey areas. I agree with the last line, but it leaves a massive grey area. I am happy to partake in this game, but it would start to feel a little disrespectful if it broke out into all out debate over who is and who isn't eligible. If the rules are clear (which they are at the moment) as to who is eligible than those sort of disputes can be resolved very quickly.
Lol ppl cracking this shits over..... this.
And to think how excited I was to get 2 points last year.