Football Pope
Norm Smith Medallist
- Sep 24, 2009
- 8,345
- 4,151
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Australian International Sides
It would be, but my suggestion here, is that those ultimately responsible for that, should be held accountable. And I'm talking separately to the governance guidelines. In this instance, I believe that while Essendon has been dealt with by the AFL for the governance issues, they should also be chargeable or punishable by ASADA. While it can't be proved by ASADA that the individual players were guilty, it is reasonable to expect the club to be punished for administering something they can't prove was given. Does that mean the club gets hit twice? Yes.
I guess this is more fitting or a more reasonable expectation of clubs, but could apply where an individual athlete is in the care of a trainer or doctor. Obviously not to be applied to individual doctors where they are unfamiliar with the athlete or sport. In the case of team sports though, they are always in the care of the club. If something is done outside of that, then the responsibility defaults to the athlete/player.
Dunno, there may be ways around that, but obviously makes it harder. Why does the sports anti-drug mob only scrutinise players? In this sort of business, it is as likely/possible that a club seeks an advantage as it is an individual?
As far as the presumption of innocence goes, no supplement programme should be allowed without sanction, and if you can't show that supplements are legal (ie. what was administered) it should be presumed illegal.
I hope there's a break in at Essendon and a laptop containing all the injection fest info is passed on to ASADA....