MVP The Cranium Medal 2014 - August nomination thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
ferrisb instantly gets my vote for this month for the below pearler:
OK, so I designed an algorithm to look through every post on the blues board.

The algorithm assesses the post and classifies it into common categories.

Here is the summary results.

2ntbkg4.png

In addition, some relatively useful graphs have also been posted in other threads :)

Top shelf!
 
ferrisb instantly gets my vote for this month for the below pearler:


In addition, some relatively useful graphs have also been posted in other threads :)

Top shelf!
How did I miss this? POTY or GTFO right now!! :thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu:
 
ferrisb instantly gets my vote for this month for the below pearler:


In addition, some relatively useful graphs have also been posted in other threads :)

Top shelf!
I don't know, i think that chart is pretty wrong. There is absolutely no way there is 1% useful information round here.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I don't know, i think that chart is pretty wrong. There is absolutely no way there is 1% useful information round here.
rounded up i assume.


It's the old there are no fish in the ocean scenario.

Weigh all the fish in all the Oceans and all the water and the % is like 0.00000001% rounded off is 0
 
rounded up i assume.

It's the old there are no fish in the ocean scenario.

Weigh all the fish in all the Oceans and all the water and the % is like 0.00000001% rounded off is 0

No, was a legitimate 1%. Wasn't padded out.

Here is the coding behind a classification under Actual Useful Information....

=IF(COUNT(mentions of AFL Player))>0
OR
=IF(COUNT(mentions of AFL position))>0
OR
=IF(COUNT(mentions something remotely related to AFL ))>0
AND
Qualify under other category=0

Results were 1.04%. Hard to believe with the bar set that high, but true!!!




Ohhhh, plus at the end, I 'carried the one'....that helped....
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

No, was a legitimate 1%. Wasn't padded out.

Here is the coding behind a classification under Actual Useful Information....

=IF(COUNT(mentions of AFL Player))>0
OR
=IF(COUNT(mentions of AFL position))>0
OR
=IF(COUNT(mentions something remotely related to AFL ))>0
AND
Qualify under other category=0

Results were 1.04%. Hard to believe with the bar set that high, but true!!!




Ohhhh, plus at the end, I 'carried the one'....that helped....
mikewoodsonface.gif
 
No, was a legitimate 1%. Wasn't padded out.

Here is the coding behind a classification under Actual Useful Information....

=IF(COUNT(mentions of AFL Player))>0
OR
=IF(COUNT(mentions of AFL position))>0
OR
=IF(COUNT(mentions something remotely related to AFL ))>0
AND
Qualify under other category=0

Results were 1.04%. Hard to believe with the bar set that high, but true!!!




Ohhhh, plus at the end, I 'carried the one'....that helped....

Wow clearly I majored in the wrong things at University! I should have taken out a Bachelor of Big Footy majoring in List Management! :p
 
dont you like my posts?

I Mean.
THIS IS HOW I TALK! YOU AINT EVER SEEN MY MOVIES?

Maybe I've let my hair grow for too long and i need to cut it.

Name change to hippydude coming up?o_O
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top