Does anybody find it strange that the Bumblers* legal council have directly argued the opposite to their claims about taking PED's? The following article about their defense to Dean Robinson's suit is surely an admittance of guilt!
In response to Mr Robinson's writ, the club claimed he failed to put in place an "adequate process" to ensure substances administered to players in 2011 and 2012 did not contravene the anti-doping code, were approved by the World Anti-Doping Agency, and would not harm the health and safety of its players.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...rs-meeting-20140901-10ay1b.html#ixzz3C2sIyB64
In response to Mr Robinson's writ, the club claimed he failed to put in place an "adequate process" to ensure substances administered to players in 2011 and 2012 did not contravene the anti-doping code, were approved by the World Anti-Doping Agency, and would not harm the health and safety of its players.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...rs-meeting-20140901-10ay1b.html#ixzz3C2sIyB64