Never anything like this. Of course as a Port supporter we saw media bias from ex-Sturt and Norwood etc players but generally they were real journalists not gossip rag sycophants like they are today. There was at least a pretence at objectivity. It wasn't a 24/7 industry then either. And it was spread across a competition.
Sure they didn't like Port and the Art of Winning but they respected us for it.
KG was probably the thin end of the wedge of subjective journalism and coaches with their own columns - usually Neil Kerley - pushed their own barrow.
But then you would get ex-Victorians like Dick Jones who applauded Port Adelaide's hard-nosed brutality and ridiculed the whiners for not shaping up and meeting our standard.
KGs schoolgirl crush on the "Jarman boys" was pretty embarrassing.
Dick Jones was pretty good value. In my '89 Grand Final issue of the Footy Times, he gives it to North and its sputtering "engine room." Could tell he really enjoyed writing that column.
Maybe I'm getting old, but I reckon footy writing in The Tiser was much better back when the likes of Agars, Schwartz and Kingston were the hacks filing stories.
Say the same with the commentary of Daisy, Peter Marker and a young Special Bruce before he became enamored with stats and the "theatre of the game."
Generally, the style was leaner, cleaner and less hyperbolic. But that's probably true of most media...