The New Daily's Phantom Draft

[1992edfl2012]

The New Daily has posted a phantom draft too. Here it is:
http://thenewdaily.com.au/#sport/20...-select?&_suid=138489683672005484749673511056

It has one typo that i found which is pick 40 should read as Melbourne Demons, but other than that it's a good read and a different looking phantom.

I don't think they have full time journo's so good on them for having a crack.

Looks as though was written before the age (Quayle) and afl.com.au (Twomey) put theirs out too.

 

[nottenthagain]

Not bad but 2 of my favourites are missing, Darcy Lang and Nicholas Robertson. Just can't see how they'll miss the top 50 tomorrow. Zac Merrett through to 35 would be a bonus for Sydney

 

[1992edfl2012]

yeah apart from one small error where the (pick 40) word Brisbane appeared instead of the word Melbourne, it's actually not a bad read. They might regret not having Merrett higher but it's hard to ping the exact order of these drafts.

 

[1992edfl2012]

Not bad but 2 of my favourites are missing, Darcy Lang and Nicholas Robertson. Just can't see how they'll miss the top 50 tomorrow.

there's realistically 50 players that could fall in the 30-60 draft range and not be out of place.

 

[Hotcox]

Looks as though the page has been pulled. I am receiving a error message.

 

[Frankston Rover]

Looks as though the page has been pulled. I am receiving a error message.

Works OK for me:

http://thenewdaily.com.au/sport/201...ect/#./?&_suid=138498627568604667189517135502

 

[1992edfl2012]

works for me too: http://thenewdaily.com.au/#sport/20...-select?&_suid=138498755893203284391962119299

 

[MotleyLemon]

One of the few that seems to rank Taylor properly...

 

[Hotcox]

Working now cheers.

 

[1992edfl2012]

apparently they'll be running a post draft analysis too which should be online soon, it appeared on my twitter feed.

 

[1992edfl2012]

and here it is: http://thenewdaily.com.au/sport/2013/11/21/afl-draft-club-fared/