Reading the list management thread and the allocation of numbers sparked a thought, almost two years on from j-macs passing should we allocate the number 35 to a player? there is no rush to allocate the number however has anybody deserved to don the number or should we keep it retired for then next few years? There have been past suggestions that Jack Hombsch or Tom Jonas should be moved to the number but personally I would like to see it retired.
"The club had originally retired the number for one year, but the club's general manager of football Peter Rohde said the club had elected not to do so in 2014.
The number won't be retired permanently and will instead be reallocated at a time the club's football department feels appropriate.
"We can't lose sight of the fact that the number was John's while he was here, which is why we retired it for a season," said Rohde.
"It isn't going to be retired permanently, but we're not in any rush to reallocate it simply because a year has passed.
"We'll hand it over to a new player one day, but whether that's in one year, two years or five years will be a case of 'wait and see."
Source: http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/2013-12-03/numbers-up-the-wrap-up
"The club had originally retired the number for one year, but the club's general manager of football Peter Rohde said the club had elected not to do so in 2014.
The number won't be retired permanently and will instead be reallocated at a time the club's football department feels appropriate.
"We can't lose sight of the fact that the number was John's while he was here, which is why we retired it for a season," said Rohde.
"It isn't going to be retired permanently, but we're not in any rush to reallocate it simply because a year has passed.
"We'll hand it over to a new player one day, but whether that's in one year, two years or five years will be a case of 'wait and see."
Source: http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/2013-12-03/numbers-up-the-wrap-up