Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,219
- 81,513
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Not subjective - but objective.Financially yes. But your first point re-success can be said for ANY club that hasn't won a flag in the last decade. You're implying any CEO that doesn't win a flag during their tenure is a failure? That's a bit extreme.
I know you're happy to be rid of him and you're obviously entitled to feel that way, but some of the reasons you have listed are very subjective and therefore come across as distorted by your obviously negative opinion of Trigg.
Do you agree the CEO is ultimately responsible for an organisation's operations.
Financial Facts:
1. AFC's revenues have declined in real terms (particularly sponsorship).
2. AFC's "other" expenses have massively increased.
3. AFC's profits have gone from being the best in the AFL (when Trigg took over) to first ever loss.
4. AFC's wealth is only represented by our white elephant Westpac Centre - built under Trigg.
5. AFC has no liquidity - significantly more short term liabilities than assets. We used to be the SANFL cash cow - now the SANFL is giving us bailouts.
I have already mentioned plenty on Tippett-gate. As a business person, I look to mitigate any losses - Trigg had several opportunities, but refused to see the obvious. Cost AFC credibility, massive fines, loss of highest player for nix & 4 1st/2nd round picks.
This is not very subjective! or any subjective - these are objective facts!