The Punters' View: Is AOD Still Under Criminal Investigation?

[Akka76]

Alright all
Given that Australian Crime Commission listed the 2012 David Evans/David Kenley/Calzada meeting for AOD investment in its Project Aperio report, and given that McDevitt oddly ‘waived through’ AOD for ASADA-related Prosecution, what are the odds out there, with the punters, that AOD is still under a form of Criminal Investigation?

The punter’s views will be interesting on this?

Whilst we’re on the issue of criminality, has anyone asked who actually physically couriered the final concoction allegedly used on the Essendon players, from Alavi’s South Yarra joint to the ‘off site injecting facilities’ up Essendon way?

Are there any CityLink TOLL Records or {insert relevant Courier Company records, that may or may not be linked to a certain AFL club} here. A lot of Courier Companies have GPS installed in their vehicles nowm they’d be a way to check their 2012 records I’d say.

 

[KGBeast]

Alright all
Given that Australian Crime Commission listed the 2012 David Evans/David Kenley/Calzada meeting for AOD investment in its Project Aperio report, and given that McDevitt oddly ‘waived through’ AOD for ASADA-related Prosecution, what are the odds out there, with the punters, that AOD is still under a form of Criminal Investigation?

It is not. It's finished. Done. As of now it only exists in your head.

 

[DapperJong]

Let it go man. Let it go.

 

[Klawdy]

1,000,000 to 1.

 

[Akka76]

It's funny to look at the silence in herem, especially when you look at this from less than 2 years ago http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/david-evans-resigns.1021641/page-2

 

[Lance Uppercut]

It's funny to look at the silence in herem, especially when you look at this from less than 2 years ago http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/david-evans-resigns.1021641/page-2

I think you're gonna have to face facts matey, you're too batshit crazy for even here :|

 

[Akka76]

I think you're gonna have to face facts matey, you're too batshit crazy for even here :|

Ha Ha, you don't want people looking into this, do you?

 

[DapperJong]

dude it's a bit trolly to bump this thread

 

[Akka76]

dude it's a bit trolly to bump this thread

Sorry mate, I didn't go to the Liz Lukin School of PR Bluff and Bluster.

 

[DapperJong]

Sorry mate, I didn't go to the Liz Lukin School of PR Bluff and Bluster.

look just stop trolling please it's not that type of board

 

[Cronos]

look just stop trolling please it's not that type of board

If you think he's trolling, click report and move on.

 

[Akka76]

The question from Post 1 is legit, and worth asking, I don't see the issue with it. As cronos said, if you have an issue, send a PM to the Mods and see what they think.

 

[SBYM]

I thought Ricky Ponting was a North Melbourne fan?

 

[peppy la pew]

I imagine if the ACC were going to press charges they would've done so by now,

Time to chalk this one down in the got away with it column.

EFC going gangbusters in there by the way.

 

[Dan Cooper]

I thought Ricky Ponting was a North Melbourne fan?

100% North.

 

[KGBeast]

Ha Ha, you don't want people looking into this, do you?

Pray tell, what charges do you think should/would/could be filed?

 

[Akka76]

Pray tell, what charges do you think should/would/could be filed?

I’m no Law Enforcement specialist, but am asking the question whether ASADA waived through prosecution on AOD on tactical grounds (i.e. to not stuff up any potential criminal investigation), is, I feel, a relevant question.

I find that the alleged “clinical trial on Essendon players using AOD, or a derivative of an AOD blend/mix” where AOD has been shown to be “not allowed for human use” may be worthy of potential criminality, especially when it appears that the club’s Board Members (or is that, Coterie Group) were trying to allegedly invest in said AOD.

Very, very dodgy, if you ask me. Not least that Worksafe is now busy looking into OHS Act Breaches, which sometimes lead to criminal charges being laid at Director level.

 

[DapperJong]

If you think he's trolling, click report and move on.

Thanks mate hopefully we can get rid of these trolls together

 

[threesixpio]

I’m no Law Enforcement specialist, but am asking the question whether ASADA waived through prosecution on AOD on tactical grounds (i.e. to not stuff up any potential criminal investigation), is, I feel, a relevant question.

I find that the alleged “clinical trial on Essendon players using AOD, or a derivative of an AOD blend/mix” where AOD has been shown to be “not allowed for human use” may be worthy of potential criminality, especially when it appears that the club’s Board Members (or is that, Coterie Group) were trying to allegedly invest in said AOD.

Very, very dodgy, if you ask me. Not least that Worksafe is now busy looking into OHS Act Breaches, which sometimes lead to criminal charges being laid at Director level.

But the question is what charge? Struggling myself to think of one if they consented. Was there an injury? There could be is not good enough

 

[Akka76]

But the question is what charge? Struggling myself to think of one if they consented. Was there an injury? There could be is not good enough

Well it would be nice if anyone that has had experience in this field provided some sort of comment.

 

[threesixpio]

Well it would be nice if anyone that has had experience in this field provided some sort of comment.

I have

 

[Akka76]

I have

Is that speaking from a State or Federal context?

 

[threesixpio]

Is that speaking from a State or Federal context?

??

 

[peppy la pew]

But the question is what charge? Struggling myself to think of one if they consented. Was there an injury? There could be is not good enough

Do you think EFC will escape any form of punishment from worksafe ?

 

[Mningasimisonda]

As a side note, is AOD still open for WADA to use to suspend players if WADA appeals?

Obviously ASADA didn't want to touch it, but from memory WADA always held different views.