peternorth
Moderator
- May 6, 2005
- 127,419
- 75,543
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #6,276
Will I?
wasnt it you that complained about richo always telling king how good hes been?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Will I?
wasnt it you that complained about richo always telling king how good hes been?
Does it annoy anyone else that Jason Richardson has to tell Kingy how good he's been every morning before MG finishes?
No...
Edit:
'Twas HBF
Thanks for the linkRatings out again and sen had a slight jump with an overall share of 4.7.
Kb and the run home the stars of the station on 5.2. Andy and Andy still struggling on 3.9. The station will be worried about their ratings, as breakfast and drive the biggest advertising revenue raisers for the station.
http://radiotoday.com.au/media/images/Mel0414.JPG
Anyone else find it odd how the interviewers always slip in an AFL question for no reason when interviewing non AFL sportspeople?
Happens every time.
lol, hope he never has to catch a train at East RichmondRazor Ray was complaining on Sunday about Geelong (The Town) having "These special trains that don't stop at Werribee".
Uh,perhaps that's because they're express trains,Ray!
How does Denham get a gig? Don't think I have ever heard a journo with less clue or that struggled more to speak (Robbo included)
He was saying before if Fyfe finishes on the highest votes whoever wins the Brownlow won't feel sheepish or a bit embarrassed
Me, too. When I was a kid, I used to think some of those guys were like mysterious oracles, "blessing" us with their wisdom in print. Then, Sheehan started getting on radio and tv, and I thought, "jee, this guy can be a bit of a dickhead sometimes, and say the odd silly thing." I didn't know what to think after that. It made me cynical about the print journos, and I stopped reading the papers.i really do wish many of the journos that appear on the station stayed behind their computers. i used to enjoy reading their articles in printed media.......
Me, too. When I was a kid, I used to think some of those guys were like mysterious oracles, "blessing" us with their wisdom in print. Then, Sheehan started getting on radio and tv, and I thought, "jee, this guy can be a bit of a dickhead sometimes, and say the odd silly thing." I didn't know what to think after that. It made me cynical about the print journos, and I stopped reading the papers.
I reckon most of them do more harm than good to their reputations being on air, coz they can get exposed if they can't think quickly enough, or simply sound like a dopey bogan, ala Slobbo. * me, why would I read anything by a guy like that who can barely speak?!
So, I agree: they should stay relatively anonymous, so they'll have a better shot at maintaining a better image.
Even Connolly, whom I generally agree with. Because he tends to be a bit of a 'voice of reason' in the print media and rarely seems to take controversial/minority viewpoints, I almost get the feeling that he comes on sites like this, gauges how the majority of people feel about an issue and just goes with that. And I could do without any of them telling us about their taste in music. No-one GAF.
roco is a legend. my fondest memories of him are listening to his opinion during the off season about footy and everything else. comes across as the average joe, but with eloquence and class.
He's in touch with the common man.
Even has a swipe at so called journalism which is good.
Why are we being subjected to so much Nathan Grima all of a sudden? Is he meant to be an 'expert', funny? The amount we are getting of him lately I think it likely he will be a permanent part of the SEN team sooner or later, and I don't think that will be a good thing.
Even Connolly, whom I generally agree with. Because he tends to be a bit of a 'voice of reason' in the print media and rarely seems to take controversial/minority viewpoints, I almost get the feeling that he comes on sites like this, gauges how the majority of people feel about an issue and just goes with that. And I could do without any of them telling us about their taste in music. No-one GAF.
It's cringeworthy.Why are we being subjected to so much Nathan Grima all of a sudden? Is he meant to be an 'expert', funny? The amount we are getting of him lately I think it likely he will be a permanent part of the SEN team sooner or later, and I don't think that will be a good thing.