Mega Thread The Stats Thread

[grimlock]

Centre square setup
v Freo

• Kennedy 19
• Parker 16
• McVeigh 12
• Hannebery 12
• Jack 7
• Bird 2
• Rampe 1

Overall

• Kennedy 82
• Hannebery 63
• Parker 62
• Jack 56
• McVeigh 13
• Bird 10
• Rampe 6
• Goodes 3
• McGlynn 2

Centre square ruck contests
v Freo

• Pyke 20
• Tippett 3

Overall

• Pyke 63
• Tippett 36

Kick ins
v Freo

• Jetta 3
• Rampe 3
• Laidler 1
• Shaw 1

Overall

• Jetta 9
• Rampe 8
• Shaw 7
• McVeigh 6
• Laidler 6
• Grundy 2

 

[The King!]

does a turnover on a kick in count as a clanger or ineffective disposal given it does not count as a disposal?

 

[grimlock]

Centre square v WBD

• Kennedy 20
  • Macrae 6
  • Bontempelli 6
  • Smith 3
    
  • Jong 3
    
  • Stevens 2
• Hannebery 17
  • Stevens 4
    
  • Bontempelli 3
  • Jong 3
  • Macrae 3
  • Smith 2
    
  • Dahlhaus 1
  • Honeychurch 1
• Parker 15
  • Jong 6
    
  • Bontempelli 5
  • Smith 2
  • Picken 1
  • Stevens 1
• Mitchell 13
  • Picken 4
    
  • Macrae 3
    
  • Bontempelli 2
  • Dahlhaus 2
  • Jong 1
  • Smith 1
• K.Jack 8
  • Bontempelli 3
  • Stringer 2
    
  • Dahlhaus 1
  • Smith 1
  • Stevens 1
• McVeigh 2
  • Dahlhaus 1
  • Picken 1

Centre square - season

• Kennedy 102
• Hannebery 80
• Parker 77
• K.Jack 64
• McVeigh 15
• Mitchell 13
• Bird 10
• Rampe 6
• Goodes 3
• McGlynn 2

Ruck centre square - v WBD

• Pyke 20
  • Cordy 12
  • Roughead 7
  • T.Boyd 1
• Tippett 5
  • Roughead 5

Ruck centre square - season

• Pyke 83
• Tippett 41

Kick ins - v WBD

• Laidler 4
• Rampe 3
• Jetta 2
  
• Shaw 2

Kick ins - season

• Jetta 11
• Rampe 11
• Laidler 10
• Shaw 9
• McVeigh 6
• Grundy 2

 

[Millky95]

Jetta and McVeigh should be doing more kick ins

 

[ponsdale]

Big drop in the number of centre square rucks from Tippett? A change in strategy?

 

[grimlock]

 

[grimlock]

Center square setup

• v Melbourne
  • Kennedy 19
    • Vince 8
    • Tyson 5
    • Newton 2
    • Jones 1
    • Brayshaw 1
    • Vandenberg 1
    • Kennedy-Harris 1
  • Parker 16
    • Jones 7
    • Brayshaw 3
    • Tyson 3
    • Garlett 3
  • Mitchell 11
    • Jones 7
    • Garlett 1
    • Cross 1
    • Tyson 1
    • Vince 1
  • K.Jack 11
    • Jones 4
    • Vince 3
    • Garlett 2
    • Vandenberg 1
    • Tyson 1
  • Hannebery 7
    • Cross 7
  • McVeigh 3
    • Tyson 1
    • Newton 1
    • Jones 1
  • McGlynn 2
    • Cross 1
    • Garlett 1
• Overall
  • Kennedy 121
  • Parker 93
  • Hannebery 87
  • K.Jack 75
  • Mitchell 24
  • McVeigh 18
  • Bird 10
  • Rampe 6
  • McGlynn 4
  • Goodes 3

Centre square ruck contests

• v Melbourne
  • Pyke 20
    • Spencer 20
  • Tippett 3
    • Pedersen 2
    • Spencer 1
• Overall
  • Pyke 103
  • Tippett 44

Kick ins

• v Melbourne
  • McVeigh 3
  • Jetta 3
  • Laidler 1
  • T.Richards 1
• Overall
  • Jetta 14
  • Laidler 11
  • Rampe 11
  • Shaw 9
  • McVeigh 9
  • Grundy 2
  • T.Richards 1

So Hannebery was the sacrificial lamb this week in the centre square for Mitchell. Also as ponsdale noted, in the last few weeks Pyke has taken a big majority of the centre square bounces with Tippett reverting to a full forward/second ruck role after playing about 40% in the ruck in the first 3 rounds.

 

[Glenn_]

Interestingly Sydney have only one the Free Kick count once this season.

 

[Millky95]

Interestingly Sydney have only one the Free Kick count once this season.

We get caught holding the ball a lot

 

[grimlock]

 

[RW]

17th in clangers... I'm trying to stay optimistic about this game but that doesn't bode well against Hawthorn.

 

[Punts]

shithouse will be found out on the open spaces oh the g sat night by a superior side that punish any turnovers

 

[MarkP]

shithouse will be found out on the open spaces oh the g sat night by a superior side that punish any turnovers

Sadly I agree. And they will patiently wait for said turnovers. We will supply them. It is all they have to do

 

[The King!]

shithouse will be found out on the open spaces oh the g sat night by a superior side that punish any turnovers

Swans by 30 then?

 

[grimlock]

Centre square setup
v Geelong

• Kennedy 24
  • Blicavs 22
  • Caddy 1
  • Duncan 1
• Hannebery 17
  • Duncan 4
  • Caddy 4
    
  • Guthrie 3
  • Johnson 3
    
  • Blicavs 2
  • Selwood 1
• McGlynn 17
  • Duncan 8
    
  • Selwood 6
  • Blicavs 2 (hilarious)
  • Caddy 1
• Parker 17
  • Caddy 7
  • Selwood 6
  • Duncan 2
    
  • Blicavs 1
  • Johnson 1
• Mitchell 11
  • Caddy 5
  • Selwood 2
    
  • Duncan 2
  • Blicavs 1
  • Johnson 1
• K.Jack 10
  • Selwood 4
    
  • Caddy 3
  • Johnson 2
  • Blicavs 1
• McVeigh 3
  • Johnson 2
  • Caddy 1

YTD

1. Kennedy 145 (80.56%)
2. Parker 110 (61.11%)
3. Hannebery 104 (57.78%)
4. K.Jack 85 (47.22%)
5. Mitchell 35 (19.44%)
6. McGlynn 21 (11.67%)
7. McVeigh 21 (11.67%)
8. Bird 10 (5.56%)
9. Rampe 6 (3.33%)
10. Goodes 3 (1.67%)

Ruck setup
v Geelong

• Pyke 27
  • Stanley 27
• Tippett 6
  • Stanley 5
  • Blicavs 1

YTD

• Pyke 130 (72.22%)
• Tippett 50 (27.78%)

Kick ins
v Geelong

• McVeigh 7
• Jetta 3
• Laidler 1

YTD

1. Jetta 17 (25.00%)
2. McVeigh 16 (23.53%)
3. Laidler 12 (17.65%)
4. Rampe 11 (16.18%)
5. Shaw 9 (13.24%)
6. Grundy 2 (2.94%)
7. T.Richards 1 (1.47%)

 

[grimlock]

Lots of midfield rotations. Buddy got one start in the center, and one bounce where we only had 2 in the centre square (I think McGlynn was the guilty culprit)

Kick ins: Jetta who was leading our kick ins before the round only had 1. Possibly a sign he was playing further up the ground.

Center square
v Hawthorn

• Kennedy 20
  • Lewis 6
  • Langford 4
  • Mitchell 2
  • Roughead 2
  • Shiels 2
  • Breust 1
  • Burgoyne 1
  • Puopolo 1
  • Rioli 1
• Hannebery 14
  • Burgoyne 3
  • Puopolo 3
  • Langford 2
  • Roughead 2
  • Shiels 2
  • Breust 1
  • Lewis 1
• Parker 14
  • Lewis 6
  • Burgoyne 3
  • Langford 2
  • Mitchell 2
  • Shiels 1
• Mitchell 10
  • Lewis 4
  • Mitchell 3
  • Langford 1
  • Roughead 1
  • Shiels 1
• McGlynn 8
  • Langford 2
  • Mitchell 2
  • Breust 1
  • Lewis 1
  • Puopolo 1
  • Rioli 1
• K.Jack 4
  • Breust 2
  • Rioli 1
  • Shiels 1
• Franklin 1
  • Burgoyne 1
• No one 1
  • Burgoyne 1

YTD

1. Kennedy 165 (81.01%)
2. Parker 124 (60.88%)
3. Hannebery 118 (57.94%)
4. K.Jack 89 (43.70%)
5. Mitchell 45 (22.09%)
6. McGlynn 29 (14.24%)
7. McVeigh 21 (10.31%)
8. Bird 10 (4.91%)
9. Rampe 6 (2.95%)
10. Goodes 3 (1.47%)
11. Franklin 1 (2.95%)
12. No one 1 (2.95%)

Rucks
v Hawthorn

• Pyke 18
  • Ceglar 14
  • Hale 4
• Tippett 6
  • Hale 3
  • Ceglar 2
  • Roughead 1

YTD

1. Pyke 148 (72.55%)
2. Tippett 56 (27.45%)

Kick ins
v Hawthorn

• McVeigh 5
• Laidler 4
• Rampe 4
• Jetta 1
• Shaw 1

YTD

1. McVeigh 21 (25.30%)
2. Jetta 18 (21.69%)
3. Laidler 16 (19.28%)
4. Rampe 15 (18.07%)
5. Shaw 10 (12.05%)
6. Grundy 2 (2.41%)
7. T.Richards 1 (1.20%)

 

[grimlock]

 

[RW]

My 5 minute analysis of the above:

It's rare to come up against a side which is performing so poorly in so many of the key stats. In 13 of the team stats, Carlton are ranked 16th or below, which tells you how they are travelling at the moment. Surprisingly, they are ranked #1 in centre clearances, but this probably just reflects their midfield strength. Missing two of their top 5 clearance winners in Judd and Gibbs and their leading disposal winner in Murphy, all signs point to a big win to the Swans, but as we all know, matches aren't played on paper. I note that despite rumours of Ted's decline, he still leads the club in one-percenters, suggesting that he is spoiling as well as ever when he gets the opportunity.

 

[GotTheGoodes]

My 5 minute analysis of the above:

It's rare to come up against a side which is performing so poorly in so many of the key stats. In 13 of the team stats, Carlton are ranked 16th or below, which tells you how they are travelling at the moment. Surprisingly, they are ranked #1 in centre clearances, but this probably just reflects their midfield strength. Missing two of their top 5 clearance winners in Judd and Gibbs and their leading disposal winner in Murphy, all signs point to a big win to the Swans, but as we all know, matches aren't played on paper. I note that despite rumours of Ted's decline, he still leads the club in one-percenters, suggesting that he is spoiling as well as ever when he gets the opportunity.

And we still out clanger them....

 

[RW]

And we still out clanger them....

I purposely didn't mention that.

 

[MF]

It's pretty interesting seeing some of the contrasts in the competition wide tallies vs our game by game stats. For instance we're 15th in the competition for contested marks yet not one of our opponents this year has taken more contested marks than us in a game, which would suggest we're pretty damn good at stopping the opposition taking them.

 

[MF]

Surprisingly, they are ranked #1 in centre clearances, but this probably just reflects their midfield strength. .

If you look at the their game by game stats they actually only win the centre clearances against their opponents 50% of the time. I think them being 1st in clearances has more to do with the fact that there is more opportunity for centre clearances in their games due to the sheer amount of goals scored, which is largely due to them being s**t. So, while I'm sure their good starting midfield helps them win their share of clearances, in a way their number 1 ranking is just another indicator of how crap they are.

 

[RW]

If you look at the their game by game stats they actually only win the centre clearances against their opponents 50% of the time. I think them being 1st in clearances has more to do with the fact that there is more opportunity for centre clearances in their games due to the sheer amount of goals scored, which is largely due to them being s**t. So, while I'm sure their good starting midfield helps them win their share of clearances, in a way their number 1 ranking is just another indicator of how crap they are.

Haha yes. The thing is though, their midfield isn't completely s**t. Their three outs this week (even old man Judd) would get a start in any team, but the side has still been crap. Sooner or later they're bound to string a few decent games together, it's just unlikely to start this week given the players missing.

 

[grimlock]

It's pretty interesting seeing some of the contrasts in the competition wide tallies vs our game by game stats. For instance we're 15th in the competition for contested marks yet not one of our opponents this year has taken more contested marks than us in a game, which would suggest we're pretty damn good at stopping the opposition taking them.

Good pick up, in fact we are the best in the league by some distance. We concede 6.1 CM per game, the 2nd best is Port with 7.5. The worst is the Dogs with 12.9.

 

[MF]

Haha yes. The thing is though, their midfield isn't completely s**t. Their three outs this week (even old man Judd) would get a start in any team, but the side has still been crap. Sooner or later they're bound to string a few decent games together, it's just unlikely to start this week given the players missing.

Yeah I agree. The midfield still has to be good enough to win their share of those centre clearances.