Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol that would be incredibly kind compared to whats written, and jesus wants to send us to hell if we look at a woman with lust. Go figure lol we are all going to hellI think it was a whipping?
Lol that would be incredibly kind compared to whats written, and jesus wants to send us to hell if we look at a woman with lust. Go figure lol we are all going to hell
Try againGoing to hell means the punishment comes after death, which is fine by people who live in the real world. It doesn't call for violence to be enacted here.
Hellfire is used in Islam, to scare people. I fail to see how Bible is any better than Islam.Homosexuality is pronounced as a sin in islamic texts, that's why you see gays pushed off rooftops in Islamic countries. Beheading is sanctioned, that's why you see so much beheading in the islamic world. Same with non-believers, Jews. The hateful influence is obvious.
This the same Afghanistan where women were lined up on a soccer field in their niqabs and systematically executed? Or is it an imaginary Afghanistan where everything was fine until the big bad USA showed up for no reason?
Because most people are pussies who won't kill and are thus ruled by those who aren't and will.How do you explain the fact that every Muslim every day is NOT out slaughtering the infidel? Not every Muslim takes on 100% of the observances and the laws of the Qur'an and the Hadiths.
You seem to believe that because the ancient texts are interspersed with the violence of the times they were written in it means all subsequent adherents must themselves feel compelled to carry out violent jihad against all unbelievers and apostates for every second of every day.
Yet the proportion of violent fundamentalists vs that those who go about their daily business is still stacked far in the favour of non-violence.
Why is this?
Try again
5:26 Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.
5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
5:29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
5:30 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
How do you explain the fact that every Muslim every day is NOT out slaughtering the infidel?
Hellfire is used in Islam, to scare people. I fail to see how Bible is any better than Islam.
It's simple, they are able to cherry pick, same as Christians do.
not all christians NSFW: http://heavy.com/news/2015/12/anti-...urder-mass-grave-genocide-uncensored-youtube/
let me guess, they're not "real" Christians. I mean honestly, do you not see the issue with your argument? you cannot excuse Christian extremists without presenting the same excuse for Islamic extremists.
No, they can be real Christians, the question is whether what they are doing is to the letter of Christian texts, as ISIS is to the Koran. You can have murderers from any religion, that doesn't mean their deeds correlate to their religion. This is pretty basic stuff.
you mean s**t like this: But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me
didn't even need to go old testament for that. but by all means keep excusing christian terrorism in Africa.
it is secularism that holds back the rabid dogs of religion. the religious in secular countries pick and choose because they have to. when the truly religious are allowed to run things their way, The results are always the same, Barbarism.
http://www.islamforpeace.org/quran.html
A friend of mine once told me that the Quran instructs Muslims to kill all Infidels. I agreed with him that violent interpretations of the Quran exist and permeate many of our Islamic books. My friend then quoted the following 3 verses to prove his point.
Quran: {The infidels are your sworn enemies Sura 4:101}
Quran {Prophet, make war on the infidels Sura 66: 9}
Quran {Never be a helper to the disbelievers Sura 28:86}
I thanked my friend for making this point as well as indicating these verses, and then responded as follows:
Comments:
Clearly, the above verses can incite much animosity and subsequent violence vis-a-vis all non-Muslims. Accepted literally - and uncritically - these verses lend themselves to the unjust persecution of otherwise innocent people, whose only crime is being non-Muslim.
However, a pivotal matter of linguistic importance is often overlooked: the significance and usage of the definite article, "al" (i.e., "the"), which precedes the various disparaging Arabic words - kafirun, mushrikun - that describe non-believers in the Quran and which are often translated as "non-believers," "infidels," "idolaters," or "polytheists." Furthermore, in Arabic, the definite article is physically attached to the word it describes.
See below:
Quran: {The infidels are your sworn enemies Sura 4:101}
Quran {Prophet, make war on the infidels Sura 66: 9
Quran {Never be a helper to the disbelievers Sura 28:86}
The exact Arabic expression in these verses - indeed, in every verse that talks of the non-believer - is "Al-Kaferrin" or "Al-la-dhina Kafaru." The use of "Al-" or "Al-la-dhina" limits the verse (and thus commandment) to
1) a specific time and place in history, and
2) a specific group of people who were obstacles to the establishment of Islam in its nascent phase.
It is these two factors that caused these verses to be revealed. Had the intentions of the Quran been to extend the application of these verses in perpetuity, it would have used the expression "Man Kafar," rather than "Al-Kafereen" or "Al-La-dhina Kafaru". The former, "Man Kafar," literally means any one who does not believe in God; while the latter, "Al-Kafereen," - the infidels - denotes a specific group of people: they who fought Prophet Mohamed in the early stages of Islam...
The Testament also says to love your enemies and contains a peaceful message overall. If anything it's irresponsibly peaceful. I'm not a defender of the NT, and I have been critical of it on this board, but it's just denial to claim it's no different to the Koran which clearly preaches violence and subjugation to its dying verse.
I'm not excusing the actions, but your claim is that this is a plausible interpretation of the Christian faith, and that's just a nonsense when you read the take home message of Gospels. You might have better arguments to throw at me here, so far all you've given me is a gentle demonstration of how little you know about this subject.
both the old testment and the new testament advocates both peace and violence. your lack of understanding this proves only that you've fallen hook line and sinker for the propaganda of faithful.
we have 1500 years of atrocities committed in the name of your lord and we seek to lecture me on interpretation?
your doing exactly what you accuse muslims of doing when it comes to islamic terror. if you can't see that then your already lost.
I don't deny it at all. The difference is that the Koran abrogates peaceful verses with violent ones and the Bible abrogates violent verses with peaceful ones. Muhammad is only peaceful when he doesn't have any power.
Who is my Lord?
I'm beheading non-believers, supporting fascism, denying equal rights for minorities, pushing homosexuals off rooftops, kidnapping people's families until they convert? This is nonsense.
you continue to conflate. both the koran and the bible can be used to support violence and both at times demand violence. your understanding of history of religious interpretation and application is astounding for a bloke who doggedly criticise's islam.
you seek only to support both one interpretation of Christianity and one interpretation of Islam and deny others exist because it doesn't fit into your black and white bubble.
and please don't be a dickhead you know exactly what i'm referring to
But since you brought it up......... everything you just accused muslim extremists of doing. (quite rightly) Christian extremists also do and have just as many passages and history and classical interpretation backing them up.
You need only open the other to realise that islam is not the exception but the rule.
yes jesus is saying do that orelse rot in hell...very peaceful right?That's not violence, it's at best self-mutilation? The point Jesus is making here is that nothing is more important than getting into Heaven.
yes jesus is saying do that orelse rot in hell...very peaceful right?
I don't know but was there like 6 million Jews exterminated by Christians in the middle of Europe only 70 years ago because they killed Jesus?
Those nazi s where radical Christian supremacists weren't they?
So why is bible full of "Hell" stuff then? sydney bloods is spot on, you are interpreting it as it suits youIt kind of is, because hell doesn't exist . . . this doesn't cause a problem in the real world.