Obviously 86-89 tem has a lot to say, and the potential is unfilled.
But assuming they can achieve similar success, how do they rate ? On what we have seen so far.
Immediately we think of the geelong question, and that the 86-89 team would be the one inflicting mental demons on other sides. But they did have losses to other top teams of the era
But im really questioning rather than stating here
But assuming they can achieve similar success, how do they rate ? On what we have seen so far.
Immediately we think of the geelong question, and that the 86-89 team would be the one inflicting mental demons on other sides. But they did have losses to other top teams of the era
But im really questioning rather than stating here