Tippett's Gone - READ RULES BEFORE POSTING

Which AFC deserter were/are you most salty towards?


  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Must have been a red card bonanza on this thread when he left by opposition posters?
Indeed I've copped a few haha. Was curious how long the rage continued on for only 1200 plus pages lol. That has to be some kind of record. No one has vented since August 3. That's some degree of theraputic improvement as a collective by the Crowery.
 
Indeed I've copped a few haha. Was curious how long the rage continued on for only 1200 plus pages lol. That has to be some kind of record. No one has vented since August 3. That's some degree of theraputic improvement as a collective by the Crowery.


He's your problem now
 
http://www.afl.com.au/video/2015-08-30/tippetts-contender-for-miss-of-the-year

Ah, the memories of having this big jerk in a Crows' jumper.

kid-cant-kick-ball-o.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just heard Brian Waldron say on SEN that someone told him Tippett has a clause in his contract that if he does everything right, (play good footy), the last two years of his contact is back ended to exceed $970/year.
Even if Sydney get their trading bans lifted there's no way known any club will trade for him for that money.
 
Just heard Brian Waldron say on SEN that someone told him Tippett has a clause in his contract that if he does everything right, (play good footy), the last two years of his contact is back ended to exceed $970/year.
Even if Sydney get their trading bans lifted there's no way known any club will trade for him for that money.

You would think the Swans would have to pay a big part of his contract to let him go. No way is this guy worth $970k
 
Just heard Brian Waldron say on SEN that someone told him Tippett has a clause in his contract that if he does everything right, (play good footy), the last two years of his contact is back ended to exceed $970/year.
Even if Sydney get their trading bans lifted there's no way known any club will trade for him for that money.
Tippett - New contact, new clause?

4a95c11dfa75dddf90d65ea783ea857c4b47ef61745fc9d34d8dfa0d28db7129.jpg
 
Just heard Brian Waldron say on SEN that someone told him Tippett has a clause in his contract that if he does everything right, (play good footy), the last two years of his contact is back ended to exceed $970/year.
Even if Sydney get their trading bans lifted there's no way known any club will trade for him for that money.
In before 2nd round pick joke
 
Just heard Brian Waldron say on SEN that someone told him Tippett has a clause in his contract that if he does everything right, (play good footy), the last two years of his contact is back ended to exceed $970/year.
Even if Sydney get their trading bans lifted there's no way known any club will trade for him for that money.



That's bloody cheap.
 
Just heard Brian Waldron say on SEN that someone told him Tippett has a clause in his contract that if he does everything right, (play good footy), the last two years of his contact is back ended to exceed $970/year.
Even if Sydney get their trading bans lifted there's no way known any club will trade for him for that money.
Correct.

Buddy's contact increases in the middle too, so from next year, these 2 forwards will use up more than 20% of their salary cap!

The better hope that the TV rights brings big salary cap increases...
 
Just heard Brian Waldron say on SEN that someone told him Tippett has a clause in his contract that if he does everything right, (play good footy), the last two years of his contact is back ended to exceed $970/year.
Even if Sydney get their trading bans lifted there's no way known any club will trade for him for that money.

That seems about right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top