Analysis Tom Mitchell

Remove this Banner Ad

The kid has yet again proved that he is a gun, and will continue to be a gun for a long time in red and white.

On that basis, the mods should do the right thing and put this thread into permanent hibernation, because i for one am sick of seeing it on the first page.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Swan4Life said:
On that basis, the mods should do the right thing and put this thread into permanent hibernation, because i for one am sick of seeing it on the first page.
Click to expand...

we can't do that because people will still talk about it. Just don't read it.
 
Good game by Tom. Got a bit more space. Needs to flatten his kicking to avoid up and unders. Loved his hardness
 
Coach John Longmire said "he certainly racks up possessions but i stand by my stupid decision to ignore him most weeks, there are many things he needs to work on, a lot of them are the indescribable intangibles, they don't apply to others just Tom. He might stay in now, but hopefully he drops off soon and I can send him back to the NEAFL."
 
Sir Swans said:
Coach John Longmire said "he certainly racks up possessions but i stand by my stupid decision to ignore him most weeks, there are many things he needs to work on, a lot of them are the indescribable intangibles, they don't apply to others just Tom. He might stay in now, but hopefully he drops off soon and I can send him back to the NEAFL."
Click to expand...

Skimming that quote I thought it was real. Wouldn't surprise me to hear Longmire say something like that.
 
Sir Swans said:
Coach John Longmire said "he certainly racks up possessions but i stand by my stupid decision to ignore him most weeks, there are many things he needs to work on, a lot of them are the indescribable intangibles, they don't apply to others just Tom. He might stay in now, but hopefully he drops off soon and I can send him back to the NEAFL."
Click to expand...

Yes with Mitchell I am genuinely worried if he has one poor game he will be back in the NEAFL. He is not given the same leeway as most other players.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

RUNVS said:
Yes with Mitchell I am genuinely worried if he has one poor game he will be back in the NEAFL. He is not given the same leeway as most other players.
Click to expand...

Mitchell knows he is just one bad game away from returning to the NEAFL, so he never allows himself to become content after a good one – or even two good ones.

There you have it one bad game away from being dropped again.

=D
 
Heeney2Franklin said:
Mitchell knows he is just one bad game away from returning to the NEAFL, so he never allows himself to become content after a good one – or even two good ones.

There you have it one bad game away from being dropped again.

=D
Click to expand...

He just got back into the team & now he is undroppable? The Mitchell-ites must think he is Sam Reid is something.
 
SM said:
Skimming that quote I thought it was real. Wouldn't surprise me to hear Longmire say something like that.
Click to expand...
He basically was saying something like that, that was quotes from the article paraphrased. Horse was awkwardly trying to justifying the non-selection.
 
What does Horse know about coaching ? I say let BF do the selections each week.
 
Sir Swans said:
Coach John Longmire said "he certainly racks up possessions but i stand by my stupid decision to ignore him most weeks, there are many things he needs to work on, a lot of them are the indescribable intangibles, they don't apply to others just Tom. He might stay in now, but hopefully he drops off soon and I can send him back to the NEAFL."
Click to expand...
Longmire has had his phone hacked by News Limited no doubt.
 
Heeney2Franklin said:
Mitchell knows he is just one bad game away from returning to the NEAFL, so he never allows himself to become content after a good one – or even two good ones.

There you have it one bad game away from being dropped again.

=D
Click to expand...

I think that is a fair analysis. If Mitchell has a bad game and Bird has a good NEAFL hit out, their roles will be swapped.

Bird V Mitchell is the biggest one on one battle for selection in the whole Swans squad.

I believe that Longmire is very reluctant to pick both Bird and Mitchell in the same 22 if Parker and Kennedy are available . The only time it's happened recently is in the wet, where pace is not a big factor.

I think the three inside midfield extractor theory is the only way to look at Mitchell's and Birds prospects. It's as clear as the cricket test team philosophy of picking three quicks and a spinner, which occurs 90% of the time.
 
Greg Ryan said:
I think that is a fair analysis. If Mitchell has a bad game and Bird has a good NEAFL hit out, their roles will be swapped.

Bird V Mitchell is the biggest one on one battle for selection in the whole Swans squad.

I believe that Longmire is very reluctant to pick both Bird and Mitchell in the same 22 if Parker and Kennedy are available . The only time it's happened recently is in the wet, where pace is not a big factor.

I think the three inside midfield extractor theory is the only way to look at Mitchell's and Birds prospects. It's as clear as the cricket test team philosophy of picking three quicks and a spinner, which occurs 90% of the time.
Click to expand...


Poor Bird its not even close
 
Sketi said:
He basically was saying something like that, that was quotes from the article paraphrased. Horse was awkwardly trying to justifying the non-selection.
Click to expand...

Yeah I know, I saw the real quote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SwansProudly
Player Watch #35 Caleb Mitchell
2 3 4
Replies
85
Views
6K
caesar88
caesar88

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top