Seems to me that you can only have strong views of a player based on their YouTube video if that view is positive. It's a bit unfair.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the issue is that Royal Eagle and others have presumably seen these kids play live on multiple occasions know what they're capable of.Seem as though I've done that with most of the draftees this year.
Suppose I now a family man and have no life.
In all seriousness though, you're right in the fact that I have polarised opinions, probably stronger this year than any year before.
Yeah I know RE knows his s**t and I can see where he was coming from...Just an over reaction for mine.I think the issue is that Royal Eagle and others have presumably seen these kids play live on multiple occasions know what they're capable of.
Snadden also doesn't have an AFL 'highlights' video like the TAC Cup boys tend to, so we are probably biased against him based on just the u/18 carnival footage.
If Cole only had his Skippos video footage for instance, we would be doubting that pick a lot more as well.
Full of s**t is an overreaction but evaluating our rookie draft on two short videos is also a bit hasty.
I think the issue is that Royal Eagle and others have presumably seen these kids play live on multiple occasions know what they're capable of.
Snadden also doesn't have an AFL 'highlights' video like the TAC Cup boys tend to, so we are probably biased against him based on just the u/18 carnival footage.
If Cole only had his Skippos video footage for instance, we would be doubting that pick a lot more as well.
Full of s**t is an overreaction but evaluating our rookie draft on two short videos is also a bit hasty.
lol I hope he shrinks 2 cms.Hope he grows 2-4 cms, That puts him in fyfe, cripps and bont territory.
Needs to work on his endurance kicking fell away when tired.
He's the same height as FyfeHope he grows 2-4 cms, That puts him in fyfe, cripps and bont territory.
Maybe we didn't rate him.On another subject, I wish that we had drafted Glass-McCasker in the ND instead of having an extra rookie, don't see the real benefit of it. Despite his reported poor kicking, could still be a quality KPD, worth a gamble. It would've been nice to have an extra young tall developing in the WAFL given that the age of Emac and Brown in particular.
What is the difference between adding players on the main list or via rookies? Is it just rookies can be de-listed after 1 year?Maybe we didn't rate him.
Are you stating colleges meaningful stats last season?I'm staggered people can form such strong views from 3 minutes of footage, consisting of 5 kicks, 2 marks and a handball.
WCE got excellent value in the national draft with Partington and Cole. I rated them 13th and 18th respectively in this draft class which in the late 20s and 30s is highly impressive.
Partington can play as a mid (outside or inside) and can also play forward. Highly productive, excellent pace/endurance athlete, uses the footy well and can provide scoreboard impact. Has played good footy in SA and through the u18 championships so he is a very solid selection.
Cole is a very versatile type. Can play through the midfield (outside/inside) and on a flank at either end. Also highly productive. Endurance and work rate good and will willingly take on the game and do his best to do damage with ball in hand even if his disposal efficiency at times can suffer as a result.
Having the extra main list spot available lets us upgrade someone if we want to without having to rely on a LTI, I think that's the real reason we're going in 1 short on the main list. Obvious candidate to upgrade is Adamson, I think he'll get a couple of senior games next year. If we'd upgraded Adamson to the main list in the national draft then we'd effectively have had 1 less player on our squad (40 main, 4 rookie, 1 cat B rookie) where as now we've got 39 main, 5 rookie, 2 cat b rookies.What is the difference between adding players on the main list or via rookies? Is it just rookies can be de-listed after 1 year?
Thank you for the detailed info on him...I'll be watching with a keen interest.Ardent Im not attacking you personally, just saying anyone making sweeping comments on players from short edited videos,
is talking from a uneducated position, and is speaking crap. If you has seen videos of Nat Fyfe as a junior you wouldn't of been impressed
his under 18 carnival was poor.
As for Snadden all year i have been watching him, since he trained with club in the preseason and impressed.
First thing you notice about him is his movement through traffic, not many players at all have that.
He is smooth and very quick silk like.
Then the next thing is his burst from stoppages he is powerful particularly around half forward, have seen him hit the
ball at speed and break open a pack many times with a handball or kick.
He's a good left handed handball from stoppages.
He always seem's better on the inside than the outside, on the outside his decision making can be suspect if he has too much
time, on the inside seems much more natural, and has a little mongrel in him at times attacking the footy.
Has good composure under pressure.
He's very versatile so was thrown all over the field from half back half forward, wing and inside centre.
His best footy is played inside centre and half forward, is good overhead.
He was injury prone this year mainly from growing into his size, which effected his production.
Hopefully he grows no more, and can put some more weight on
Needs to work on his endurance kicking fell away when tired.
His kicking is generally very good, great set shot on goal good kicking action powerful left foot, likes to kick around corners.
Sometimes tries to kick the footy to hard, his general disposal efficiency is very high
Like most of the wa academy team this year was coached poorly and not played in his preferred position
(our coaching was awful this year)
His east freo games give better idea of the player he was.
Going by his video on WCE site he see's himself as a inside mid which is good as he seems most natural there.
http://www.westcoasteagles.com.au/news/2015-11-27/snadden-joins-the-nest
problem with adamson is as a cat B rookie his salary is outside cap until he plays a senior game . If they were looking to upgrade him they would have had to make allowances for that .Having the extra main list spot available lets us upgrade someone if we want to without having to rely on a LTI, I think that's the real reason we're going in 1 short on the main list. Obvious candidate to upgrade is Adamson, I think he'll get a couple of senior games next year. If we'd upgraded Adamson to the main list in the national draft then we'd effectively have had 1 less player on our squad (40 main, 4 rookie, 1 cat B rookie) where as now we've got 39 main, 5 rookie, 2 cat b rookies.
Snadden has a nice kicking technique/penetration/kicking style but can be off for accuracy by the looks. The attributes are definitely there so hopefully he avoids doing a Tunbridge and failing to put it all together.
Snadden moves and kicks like ellis.
Agreed, don't see many similarities.I dont really see it, much more athletic than Ellis.