Prochard123
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2014
- 7,147
- 5,773
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
And i thought i rated hill too highly(IMO worth pick 8-12)... Clearly I was wrong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Well, if Brad Hill is worth a top 5 pick Stephen definately isAnd i thought i rated hill too highly(IMO worth pick 8-12)... Clearly I was wrong
Very funny.Thoughts on Nathan Brown and our second rounder for Tom Mitchell?
Yeah I was talking about Bradley hill, Stephen hill is probably the best of that type of playerWell, if Brad Hill is worth a top 5 pick Stephen definately is
I know you areVery funny.
Thoughts on Nathan Brown and our second rounder for Tom Mitchell?
If Sando started playing Lyons we would see how good he isLol, Kennedy is worth much more than Lyons. If Buckley stopped playing the kid as sub we would see how good he is.
Thoughts on Nathan Brown and our second rounder for Tom Mitchell?
I don't understand why Tom Mitchell is rated so highly here? Sure he's worth a first rounder but you aren't gonna get a top 10 pick for someone who can't get a game.
Bloody Gary Rohan has been playing and he hasn't!
So again he asks, why would you give a top 10 pick for a midfielder who can't get a game? It doesn't matter if they have a great midfield, top 10 picks are reserved for certain players, that means someone playing AFL seniors. It's different if he was a budding tall, but a third year well built midfielder should be playing senior footy. You don't give top 10 picks for midfielders who have gone backwards in their third years and been dropped to the reserves.This is a silly post. Sydney have the best inside ball brigade in the league. That's why he can't get a game.
The above discussion has me curious why Mitchell isn't getting games. Would you mind explaining?Yeah.... no way.
InjuredThe above discussion has me curious why Mitchell isn't getting games. Would you mind explaining?
So again he asks, why would you give a top 10 pick for a midfielder who can't get a game? It doesn't matter if they have a great midfield, top 10 picks are reserved for certain players, that means someone playing AFL seniors. It's different if he was a budding tall, but a third year well built midfielder should be playing senior footy. You don't give top 10 picks for midfielders who have gone backwards in their third years and been dropped to the reserves.
Hard to get a game when you're injuredI don't understand why Tom Mitchell is rated so highly here? Sure he's worth a first rounder but you aren't gonna get a top 10 pick for someone who can't get a game.
Bloody Gary Rohan has been playing and he hasn't!
Sounds a bit like Darling.He is now a very trim guy who runs well. He covers the ground and works up the park really nicely. He may still need to improve his endurance a bit more but I could see him a really nice flanker at AFL level. He has a presence around the ball and goes in and wins the stoppages well for a guy who was a lead up target when I saw him play junior football.
come on mate, do better than that.Hearing Kennedy and Broomhead want to come home.
Lyons for Kennedy
MArtin for Broomhead
This is a silly post. Sydney have the best inside ball brigade in the league. That's why he can't get a game.