Mega Thread Trade Targets 2014

[blues4flag]

Garlick is going to on SEN shortly. Rogers has said that the WB are easy to deal with so expected a deal to be done quickly.

Good ploy by Rogers. Bullies will be too self conscious to go too hard.

 

[MrsEddieBetts]

I can feel my heart breaking.

Yeah. HBF and I were specifically looking for him...but he wasn't to be seen. Conspicuous by his absence
I miss the Jeffy of the 2013 elimination final...

 

[BringBackSimmo]

I just heard the headline, no content.

Macca is indicating we have a number of players on the table. But if I understand correctly we'll re-sign each of them, including Kane, should no one offer us a deal.

Out-of-contract Blue Lucas on the trade table
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-10-02/blue-lucas-on-the-table

 

[Juddalenko]

Out-of-contract Blue Lucas on the trade table
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-10-02/blue-lucas-on-the-table

Should iterate that the article states he is only on the trade table because he hasn't signed.

 

[etsal1]

Should iterate that the article states he is only on the trade table because he hasn't signed.

Rogers also said he hasn't offered a contract yet either. So that's probably why he hasn't signed

 

[Sheephead]

Should iterate that the article states he is only on the trade table because he hasn't signed.

Inference is that Sugar wants the club to look for a possible trade for more opportunities. If nothing suitable is found, both parties are happy to sign up on a one year deal.

 

[ferrisb]

If we swap Jeffy for melksham, I'm appealing to the federal court!

 

[Matty411]

Saw article or mention saying Bombers are not one of those interested in Jeffy. Crisis averted.

 

[ferrisb]

Why do people seem to think we are going to get anything for Waite? I really don't see us getting a compensation pick (especially if last year is anything to go by)

Need MM to hold a press conference and say 'most of the other coaches agree that we deserve pick 27 as compensation'.

If he doesn't feel confident about it, Paul roos can help him with the delivery...

 

[King of Ruin]

"Pick 27 or GTFO" screams Paul Roos.

Reminds me of when Thy shouts at everyone for the ******* teams.

 

[Big Sim]

If Bulldogs add Membrey to Crameri and Stringer they will have three same medium sized amigos.

 

[etsal1]

http://www.news.com.au/sport/breaki...ed-help-to-do-so/story-fnect155-1227078234033


Another HS article says we are out of race for Membrey.

 

[jd2010]

http://www.news.com.au/sport/breaki...ed-help-to-do-so/story-fnect155-1227078234033


Another HS article says we are out of race for Membrey.

Did a CTRL+F on that article on Membrey and showed nothing. Except for a link to this http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/vi...bulldogs-in-hunt/story-fndv8ujy-1227077570836

 

[jd2010]

Since we don't know what clubs have shown slight interest in Garlett and Robinson its all speculative but would something like this be a possibility?

Robbo or Garlett + 26 for 17 (Sydney) or 18 (Hawthorn) & their 3rd rounders
18 then used for Jaksch

Lose: Robbo/Garlett + 26
Gain: Jaksch
Keep: Pick 6

 

[GT619]

Does mean jaksch has picked us by that article

 

[etsal1]

Did a CTRL+F on that article on Membrey and showed nothing. Except for a link to this http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/vi...bulldogs-in-hunt/story-fndv8ujy-1227077570836

I said another, meaning seperate from the one I posted

 

[Burgers45]

What about straight swap, Jaksch for Lucas. Both pick 12 draft picks. Ideal trade.

 

[etsal1]

Since we don't know what clubs have shown slight interest in Garlett and Robinson its all speculative but would something like this be a possibility?

Robbo or Garlett + 26 for 17 (Sydney) or 18 (Hawthorn) & their 3rd rounders
18 then used for Jaksch

Lose: Robbo/Garlett + 26
Gain: Jaksch
Keep: Pick 6

Sydney can use their first - going to Heeney. Hawks using theirs on O'Rourke. Maybe we give 6 to GWS for Jaksch and Hawthorn give us 18 and get O'Rourke. So GWS get 6 for Jaksch & Orourke

 

[jd2010]

Sydney can use their first - going to Heeney. Hawks using theirs on O'Rourke. Maybe we give 6 to GWS for Jaksch and Hawthorn give us 18 and get O'Rourke. So GWS get 6 for Jaksch & Orourke

Was using those 2 sides as an example what about Garlett + 26 for Essendon's 21 or Port's 16?

 

[Magruder]

Sydney can use their first - going to Heeney. Hawks using theirs on O'Rourke. Maybe we give 6 to GWS for Jaksch and Hawthorn give us 18 and get O'Rourke. So GWS get 6 for Jaksch & Orourke

Not bad.

 

[Tom Joad]

Assuming Jaksch is our No.1 KPP target, does anyone else think the club has made a choice to target Jones ahead of Membrey?

 

[Blue By Blood]

What about straight swap, Jaksch for Lucas. Both pick 12 draft picks. Ideal trade.

That article etsal1 posted suggest GWS don't want a player from us as they need to cut down their list size.

I don't think we will chase Membrey, not if we're getting Jaksch and Jones. We already have Menzel and Walker to play that role and we need to save some draft picks to bring in some kids.

 

[The Flying Doormat]

That article etsal1 posted suggest GWS don't want a player from us as they need to cut down their list size.

Will they take cash?

 

[BringBackSimmo]

Will they take cash

I'll chip in $10

 

[Tom Joad]

That article etsal1 posted suggest GWS don't want a player from us as they need to cut down their list size.

I don't think we will chase Membrey, not if we're getting Jaksch and Jones. We already have Menzel and Walker to play that role and we need to save some draft picks to bring in some kids.

Agree with that. Jones has 10cm and 10kg on Membrey. Plus with Walker playing as a permanent forward next year, White/Watson can also fill mid-size forward roles (just about) if need be. I think talls are the key. Wouldn't surprise me if Jaksch plays as a permanent back if we get him.