Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone listening to the little lapdog talk up goldsack on Friday would have worked out that port were not the club chasing goldsack.
No way does Rowe get that excited about anything to do with port.
It's obvious Collingwood are going to rebuild now. Buckley started getting rid of the older blokes as soon as their 2013 season ended.If Goldsack leaves Collingwood I will be amazed, he's crucial to what little culture they have left there.
It's much deeper than that.It's obvious Collingwood are going to rebuild now. Buckley started getting rid of the older blokes as soon as their 2013 season ended.
Goldsack (28 next year) won't be playing when they challenge for their next flag. I think they would like to keep him though due to the fact the compensation they would get would be pretty bad.
Well this is based on commentators comments. Goldsack could have gone to Taberner while Trengove goes into the ruck to give Lobbe a spell.What if anything could Goldsack have offered us yesterday?
He's meant to be able to play both ends. Goldsack in instead of Monfries, start on the ground up forward. Moore as sub. 95% sure would have had a structure to capitalise more on our early forward domination and it would have been a different game.What if anything could Goldsack have offered us yesterday?
Isn't this all stirred up by cRowie's interpretation from his last interview with Goldsack?
cRowie says its true.
Rucci says its not.
Rucci says he's going to the crows.
Crowie says he's not going to the crows because Sanderson said so.
Sounds like playground stuff.
Why are people still talking about the 'Sack coming to Port? The club has said categorically "We are NOT interested"
Would rather we continue to develop Clurey, Shaw etc...
Let's turn an average 28 year old third defender into a forward and pay him $400k. Please no. Gwilt is better!