- Banned
- #51
Not a big ice cream eater tbh
Wife won't let you?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a big ice cream eater tbh
Im not trying to teach you Ian. Im also not trying to espouse myself as any kind of expert. Im also not arguing with you, so why make it personal?Clearly there is a pejorative element. It's never used as a compliment, is it?
Have you ever heard anything celebrated or praised for being 'vanilla'?
I know what it's intended to mean. The point is that it adds nothing – people just like the sound of it because they think it makes them sound more observant and cutting-edge. Like when people started talking about HBFs as "quarterbacks". Stupid, pretentious bullshit.
What's wrong with the existing vocabulary?
Oh, please. Spare me the cookie-cutter etymology lesson. Did you read that on the back of a cornflakes box?
Languages develop over hundreds of years through migration, changes in social structure and the advent of technology. A voguishly stupid way of talking about footballers isn't 'developing the language'.
I thought ribenna was more your thingDamn it, didn't think of Vanilla Coke.
The greatest* drink known to man.
*non-alcoholic
It's not personal.Im not trying to teach you Ian. Im also not trying to espouse myself as any kind of expert. Im also not arguing with you, so why make it personal?
No quarterback?I like to describe Ian Dargie as vanilla. He shows a plethora of physicality as to how he hunts the footy, but his usage lets him down.
Maybe you should go and sleep on it?^^ I think he is vanilla troll. Slightly annoying, fairly obvious and overall just meh.
Your peanuts can suck mine. Boysenberry is the s**tPffft:
Your peanuts can suck mine. Boysenberry is the s**t
You might be in for a paddling.Thems fighting words.
I guess what he means is that vanilla only gets the meaning we are referring to in the icecream context."The whole point is that it's not a uniquely football term. It refers to the flavour of ice cream. That's why it is stupid"
Hahaha.
Nice one Ian Dargie. I usually find your posts entertaining and relatively intelligent. Stupid would be telling people that vanilla is not a football term and refers to a flavour of ice cream. You do realise that vanilla preceded ice cream and was not a result of ice cream. Your pedantic posting is not up to its usual form. It is also not a uniquely ice cream term. I think you will find upon further research that vanilla is an independent entity that can exist outside of the ice cream world that you wish to restrict it to.
Who should I make it out to?Nice one Ian Dargie. I usually find your posts entertaining and relatively intelligent.
I never said it was "a uniquely ice cream term". Did I?It is also not a uniquely ice cream term. I think you will find upon further research that vanilla is an independent entity that can exist outside of the ice cream world that you wish to restrict it to.
That's "all you know"?All i know is i'm not going to stop using it as a reference to our midfielders any time soon, bar Shuey.
Agreed.I think people use 'Vanilla' to describe a players attributes, not their ability to perform at AFL level.
Reminds me of an analogy used in Hajime no Ippo, where competitors are likened to rocks getting sifted out; Large rocks will stay, pointy ones can hang on, but well rounded ones that are to small will fall through.
Stop being a knob.
You and Gunnar should hang outI always find this an interesting comment.
I get why you feel it's needed but it'd be much fairer to use such comments in line with a broader related strategy that involved comments like:
"Stop being borderline ******ed".
"Stop being a semi literate arsehat"
"Stop being really really really dumb"
As I've discussed with the mods on here before there seems a genuine positive discrimination for idiots policy on the board.
I mean you either take shots at the stupid AND their superiors or you leave both alone