The AFL was guessing when handing down those penalties - there was no evidence of cheating and the afl tribunal cleared EFC of cheating (no banned substances given to players).
A penalty in keeping with governance should have been a fine only and at least 10 other clubs should have been penalised on a sliding scale depending on level of incompetence.
Losing draft picks should only be applicable for cheating (ie banned substances being given).
Finals being stripped is complete madness - 3 years on no definitive proof of cheating. The afl guessed and handed down the harshest penalty in history on an assumption. This itself is poor governance.
No penalties should have been handed down until ASADA completed their investigation. The afl and ASADA are the reason this has dragged on 3 yrs and EFC continue to be punished for the incompetence of afl and ASADA.
This is a massive rant and an over reaction. Every mug on the street wants to talk about Essendons poor governance blah blah blah. 50 injections? So what - nothing wrong with injections or amount of injections. Nick Riewoldt would be having around 400+ injections. It's what is in the syringe that counts - Nothing else - to date the afl and ASADA cannot prove that anything banned or harmful was given to players. They beated the drum about aod9604 for 12 months or more before giving it the all clear... The afl, ASADA and Switkowski (urged on by Evans and demetriou) exaggerated the governance issue. Hawthorn had a far more systematic injection program (swept under carpet), so did Collingwood, west coast and others. Does this make it right? No but all these people saying how bad EFC were get real. I work in healthcare and majority of public and private hospitals are poorly managed. Understaffed, overworked nurses, poor handovers, lack of documentation and nurses asking patients what drugs they need is an every day event. I've been on both sides of the equation - patient, relative of patient, healthcare professional and currently medical goods supplier. For the general community to throw the book at Essendon and in particular Hird is a joke. I've worked at many of the major hospitals, major medical device manufacturers/distributors and seen poor management and governance across the board.
The AFL set the standards or lack thereof. They had a compliance program across the competition. Across the competition prior to 2013 not one team complied with that program and the afl did nothing. Every club and player were supposed to document and submit to the afl what they were administered with. Not one club complied with this. Brett Clothier and Peter Harcourt were asleep as were their managers. What do they - pin it on one club to save their own hides. The most poorly governed organisation in all of this was actually the afl - the hypocrisy of them to issue the governance penalty is actually comical.
Is it actually out there that Pies. Hawks etc run pretty dodgy Programs or did you hear this from a close source? i know up to 12 clubs were investigated or more like swept under the carpet. i think what went on was piss poor on Essendon's part but do think the penalties handed out were harsh. Fine yeah but i agree the Afl s**t themselves thinking we definitely took PEDS and would of looked bad us making the finals.