We’ll fight radical Islam for 100 years, says ex-army head Peter Leahy

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hang on, this Muslim is doing the right thing. Any chance you could support the guy instead of making calls to persecute him, and demonizing his whole religion?

Next time he might just decide youre a w***er and not alert the authorities.

Also, please name a 'Leftist' that supports Islamic extremism and terrorism.

You keep making the claim that we do, I would love to see you back it up.
 
Hang on, this Muslim is doing the right thing. Any chance you could support the guy instead of making calls to persecute him, and demonizing his whole religion?

Next time he might just decide youre a ****** and not alert the authorities.
I support what he did, hence why I said called him good Muslim.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Protesting the bombing of Gaza you mean?

Try again.

I think youll find 'Leftists' oppose anyone who is a bigotted warmonger. Be they Muslim, Jew or Christian.
Why were they happily marching alongside people carrying ISIS flags? Many from the far-Left are Islamist apologists. Great at defending the religion, but silent at attacking its atrocities. If they approached Islam the same way they do Christianity, we could take them more seriously.
 
Why were they happily marching alongside people carrying ISIS flags? Many from the far-Left are Islamist apologists. Great at defending the religion, but silent at attacking its atrocities. If they approached Islam the same way they do Christianity, we could take them more seriously.

The left dont 'defend Islam'; they denounce warmongers and bigots no matter the religion, and reject calls for persecution and discrimination.

You do see this right?
 
The left dont 'defend Islam'; they denounce warmongers and bigots no matter the religion, and reject calls for persecution and discrimination.

You do see this right?
Unfortunately the left are often silent and are unwilling to speak up at Islam's atrocities. One example of this was the 1400 odd Muslim rapes in England not being reported because the rapists were 'of Asian decent' read Pakistani's. Disgusting.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Unfortunately the left are often silent and are unwilling to speak up at Islam's atrocities. One example of this was the 1400 odd Muslim rapes in England not being reported because the rapists were 'of Asian decent' read Pakistani's. Disgusting.

Can you show me a link of where the police decided not to record 1400 rapes?
 
What wonderfully woeful comments. Guess that it is typical for those not on the right to seek censorship of those who they disagree with.

The right are much heavier censors than anyone else though mottrain. Much heavier. :(
 
The right are much heavier censors than anyone else though mottrain. Much heavier. :(
No they are not. This is incredibly false. Just look at recent examples like Roxon's desire to take the premise of 18 c even further.
 
No they are not. This is incredibly false. Just look at recent examples like Roxon's desire to take the premise of 18 c even further.

But 18c is small fry when talking about censorship.

It literally only applies to people broadcasting full blown hate speech. You're still allowed to be as racist as you like with 18c.

What about all the anti terror laws and whistleblowers being declared guilty without trial etc? Those are right wing babies right there and severe breches of our right to free speech.

Hell, the Federal Government is encouraging its employees to snitch on eachother over things they say on social media! And then gagged senior public servants from even giving media briefs! That has never happened before, you must have been outraged!
 
Why on earth are you bringing the Catholic Church into this thread? What's with the left and trying to bring in Christianity into every thread about Muslim terrorism? You're not going to find me trying to defend the actions of the CC here in regards to cover ups, so why mention it at all? Stay on topic next time, champ. Hard for the Left, I know.

Sorry to show that we should be wary of all religious sects & organisations. Just About all of them are capable & guilty of damaging society & individuals. Bringing all of them into the sunlight can only be a good thing.

But carry on & sorry put put you off your stroke.
 
But 18c is small fry when talking about censorship.

It literally only applies to people broadcasting full blown hate speech. You're still allowed to be as racist as you like with 18c.

What about all the anti terror laws and whistleblowers being declared guilty without trial etc? Those are right wing babies right there and severe breches of our right to free speech.

Hell, the Federal Government is encouraging its employees to snitch on eachother over things they say on social media! And then gagged senior public servants from even giving media briefs! That has never happened before, you must have been outraged!
Well when whistleblowers aren't whistle blowing when they do so in a way which was well illegal firstly and secondly by far and away above what was required to bring such information/concern to light it does not mean that they are being punished for whistleblowing. Secondly so reckon you didn't see Roxon's rules that were similar to 18c. Poor reply. As for the anti-terror laws, what is wrong with them? You think that it is ok for fighters to come back to Australia unabated and freely?
 
Can you show me a link of where the police decided not to record 1400 rapes?
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/2...xually-abused-report-says.html?referrer=&_r=0

Local government officials were the ones who didn't act. As Muslims were the rapists, sweet * all will be done and the monsters who didn't report it will still be free despite the fact that they should be rotting in gaol alongside the Muslim rapists. It's quite shocking that this hasn't been a bigger story, but I guess the pc crowd would think it's racist. Political correctness is ruining England.
 
But where's the link SP? What's the benefit to not prosecuting muslims?

Of course it isn't racist.
 
But where's the link SP? What's the benefit to not prosecuting muslims?

Of course it isn't racist.
Huh? I posted it above. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/2...xually-abused-report-says.html?referrer=&_r=1

Here's the official report. http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham

All because they were Pakistani's. Lawd, can you imagine from the Left the outrage if 1400 rapes were by Catholic priests? Holy s**t it actually would have made the papers in Australia. Since they're Muslims though, as usual there's just silence. Pathetic
 
no I mean the link between their Islamic faith and the non action?

I mean, as a lefty democratic socialist, the idea of anyone being able to flaunt the law (especially based on religion or ethnicity) is messed up.

I just didn't read anything in the link that said they didn't act because the perpetrators were muslim. It seemed to me like they didn't act because of placing the cases in the 'too hard' basket due to a non co-operative and untrusting community.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top