- Sep 22, 2011
- 20,302
- 72,672
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Why didn't someone from our club with a close relationship approach him ?
Like who is close to Balme from the club ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why didn't someone from our club with a close relationship approach him ?
Doubt we had a chance too. from out of Balmes own mouth he said he has a close friendship with bucks and bucks approached him. After the year finished and with bucks insistence, he moved. So the only ones who knew that Balme would move would have been Balme and these two clubs. We never had a chance
I don't know mate maybe Jack Dyer or something I'm only guessing that he'd have a close relationship with someone from the Club he played for . It's a real wild guess and a long shot. It certainly wasn't in the review so your guess is as good as mine .Like who is close to Balme from the club ?
I don't know mate maybe Jack Dyer or something I'm only guessing that he'd have a close relationship with someone from the Club he played for . It's a real wild guess and a long shot. It certainly wasn't in the review so your guess is as good as mine .
I was trying to discuss the topic seriously, unfortunately the OP when pressed couldn't/wouldn't provide a response to a legitimate question. Then as per usual went down the path of labeling me a troll and his mate then decided to pile in as well.The Rusty Trombone and _EAD_ if you two can't discuss the topic without getting personal then I will stop you both from posting in the thread, not gonna put up with you two posting this s**t all year again, get over it and stop ruining the forum for everyone else with this selfish rubbish.
I was trying to discuss the topic seriously, unfortunately the OP when pressed couldn't/wouldn't provide a response to a legitimate question. Then as per usual went down the path of labeling me a troll and his mate then decided to pile in as well.
As it is I'm no longer following this thread as it's quite clear why it was posted.
As I stated where is the 12? I think your realise you were mistaken. I actually think we aren't that cashed up, purely as it seems we don't want to get into debt again. Bearing this in mind, can we pay the top dollar to get the Voss's of this world? Probably but then you have to ask are they worth it( as you stated you don't like him). Do we actually know we didn't have a crack at these coaches and we just didn't rate them as highly as others or wouldn't offer the amount due to our perceived value in dollar terms? Put it this way, if Voss cost 500k, we have just halved our profit for the year. Would I have done? Actually yes I would, I like Voss. Mind you it isn't because of any 'help' DH needs in the box, just purely as a midfield coach to teach the position to out players. I think we have plenty of IP in our senior assistants, and all clubs understand how teams play, its just a matter of our own players ability to counteract this regardless of how many times they are told what to do to play against it.Apart from Goodwin we had the oppurtunity to get any of the above.... I glad we didnt get Voss ... I am not a fan... but we are debt free and cashed up but are you saying we couldnt compete against Port who are 5million in Debt to get him?
Balme is essentially the Dan Richo position. Did you want to sack him? I say no. Richo is doing a great job.The biggest mover this year that would have had a HUGE impact at our club is one of our ex players ... Neil Balme. How the magpies were able to get him shows we are asleep at the wheel when it comes to bolstering our off field football department.....Did we even approach him?
As I stated where is the 12? I think your realise you were mistaken. I actually think we aren't that cashed up, purely as it seems we don't want to get into debt again. Bearing this in mind, can we pay the top dollar to get the Voss's of this world? Probably but then you have to ask are they worth it( as you stated you don't like him). Do we actually know we didn't have a crack at these coaches and we just didn't rate them as highly as others or wouldn't offer the amount due to our perceived value in dollar terms? Put it this way, if Voss cost 500k, we have just halved our profit for the year. Would I have done? Actually yes I would, I like Voss. Mind you it isn't because of any 'help' DH needs in the box, just purely as a midfield coach to teach the position to out players. I think we have plenty of IP in our senior assistants, and all clubs understand how teams play, its just a matter of our own players ability to counteract this regardless of how many times they are told what to do to play against it.
As I said I don't have an issue with the idea of better coaches for the players, just thought there wasn't nearly enough options as you made out.
Balme is essentially the Dan Richo position. Did you want to sack him? I say no. Richo is doing a great job.
Options are every where... We can poach from other clubs too like Brisbane did to us.
We spent an extra 1.9 million last year on the football department... We have the cash.
Again you wont concede that there wasn't 12 or so coaches who 'moved' in the off season. Yes we could poach coaches but they have to be out of contract now unless you want to pay compensation to those clubs, as this is now the norm. I am sure all clubs have an idea who come out of contract at any given time and we would have looked at this. I personally believe we/should only want specific positional coach types( like Voss/Ratten as midfield specialists or Rutten as a KPD coach, not necessarily jack of all trades, master of none types), which is why we have gone down the way of Hayes/Rutten. Also just because we did spend the 1.9m last year, do you think they have stated we need to save money now that we 'have' spent this money? Or wait till next year after we have saved some more money then use it?Options are every where... We can poach from other clubs too like Brisbane did to us.
We spent an extra 1.9 million last year on the football department... We have the cash.
Should Freo have kept Harvey because he was doing a gear job?
I'm sure we could have both Balme and Dan working together...
But you like the current set up.. And I respect that.
I however think Dimma needs more experienced heads around him.. and not increasing that experience might be his and our downfall.
What I do think is after 6 years we should have no doubt that Dimma is the man for the job.... Can anyone honestly say he is?
Again you wont concede that there wasn't 12 or so coaches who 'moved' in the off season. Yes we could poach coaches but they have to be out of contract now unless you want to pay compensation to those clubs, as this is now the norm. I am sure all clubs have an idea who come out of contract at any given time and we would have looked at this. I personally believe we/should only want specific positional coach types( like Voss/Ratten as midfield specialists or Rutten as a KPD coach, not necessarily jack of all trades, master of none types), which is why we have gone down the way of Hayes/Rutten. Also just because we did spend the 1.9m last year, do you think they have stated we need to save money now that we 'have' spent this money? Or wait till next year after we have saved some more money then use it?
The difference is Freo thought that Harvey wasn't as good as Lyon so they sacked him, where as the club clearly thinks Richo is doing as good a job. Big difference imo. I personally don't think you can have 2 general managers of Football working together as the hierarchy wont work. Who is the boss, and who reports to who? Too many chiefs doesn't work.Should Freo have kept Harvey because he was doing a gear job?
I'm sure we could have both Balme and Dan working together...
But you like the current set up.. And I respect that.
I however think Dimma needs more experienced heads around him.. and not increasing that experience might be his and our downfall.
What I do think is after 6 years we should have no doubt that Dimma is the man for the job.... Can anyone honestly say he is?
thanks for that but it was 6, you cant include Daly.Ok not over 12 but over 7 ....
Contracts don't mean much if you want to get the right person... And you attract him with a better position.
To be fair, you do say you are allowed to have your say, and wont be silenced. The above post is suggesting the very opposite to this. You cant have it both ways.The simple truth??? Who are? Are you on the pay roll at the club? All due respect I don't value your opinion at all and have seen enough from your posting to suggest you are a know it all that thinks he gets the good oil. Please don't engage in my posting by quoting me no more.
Cheers
The difference is Freo thought that Harvey wasn't as good as Lyon so they sacked him, where as the club clearly thinks Richo is doing as good a job. Big difference imo. I personally don't think you can have 2 general managers of Football working together as the hierarchy wont work. Who is the boss, and who reports to who? Too many chiefs doesn't work.
I think it is fair to say we don't know if DH is the man for the job, as it is up for debate. However I do believe it also depends on who is available as well. Imo you don't replace DH for a rookie coach. This year will define his tenure I think. I also believe we have enough experience around him, which may then be good or bad for him.
Wasn't aimed at you ???To be fair, you do say you are allowed to have your say, and wont be silenced. The above post is suggesting the very opposite to this. You cant have it both ways.
thanks for that but it was 6, you cant include Daly.
What? You want coaches to come to us, so since he wasn't going to leave and then come back he shouldn't be in the discussion. Remember the discussion was about needing more experience in the coaching department as it is perceived to be lacking knowledge. If that is the case, then Daly who also was apart of that group is perceived to be lacking in knowledge. Remember when he was the midfield coach and we aren't going well in the first half of the year? He was moved back to the fwdline, in the second half of the year and did better. Would I keep him, of course. But the context of who we could get, shouldn't be who left us imo.So we didn't have the option to keep his experience????? Hmmm wow please fill us in on the dirt?