Willo_
Trust the Process
- Apr 27, 2010
- 35,237
- 62,327
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- 76ers, Melbourne Roys
He will hate that as well you'd imagineWhere is Stevie J?
In the sub's vest today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
He will hate that as well you'd imagineWhere is Stevie J?
In the sub's vest today.
We could of told Johnson the same thing though. Take the GWS offer or only expect a handful of games.Players are people, not commodities. You can't just cash them in like casino chips, there are ramifications for how everybody else at the club feels about it.
Was a totally different case - we didn't trade him out, we just couldn't reach agreement on a new contract and he chose to continue his footy career elsewhere. We didn't gain anything for his loss, and ergo he didn't have "value".
I've heard both Bomber and CS say he is coaching material.
Yes, but that's only true if we were only going to play him for a handful of games, whereas clearly he is (a) a walk-up start, and (b) shown excellent durability in terms of stringing games together. Chapman was still the former (though he had lost a yard or two), just not the latter at the time.We could of told Johnson the same thing though. Take the GWS offer or only expect a handful of games.
You need to say it slowly for some...
and use small short words. Throw in some appalling English too... then they'll get it.
GO Catters
Because the year you had is not the year you are having! The body gives up when it's ready, and that is usually well before the mind. I can assure you I have seen very good players, at all levels, become very ordinary in the blink of an eye, weather it be an injury, losing a yard of pace or the game just passes them by, it happens very quickly.Johnson polled 19 votes in the Brownlow last year which is something people here are overlooking. Now why would we force his hand coming off the year he had?
Seriously??
Starting him as the sub?
Chris Scott I love your work,but you've lost me today.
Chapman has had only one injury plagued year in his whole career. Johnson has had a major injury every second year of his career and you say Chapman was lacking durability. what the????Yes, but that's only true if we were only going to play him for a handful of games, whereas clearly he is (a) a walk-up start, and (b) shown excellent durability in terms of stringing games together. Chapman was still the former (though he had lost a yard or two), just not the latter at the time.
The issue was that he missed basically the entire year with a hamstring injury, an injury that had been recurring and that he had missed games with over the past couple of years. I admit that at the end of an 18-week hamstring injury I thought he did not have another two years in him.Chapman has had only one injury plagued year in his whole career. Johnson has had a major injury every second year of his career and you say Chapman was lacking durability. what the????
because other players havent missed seasons or multiple seasons. we even recruited two players in McIntosh and Rivers who had more then a season out with injury problems that had been recurring for years. then their is Menzel, Vardy, Cowan etc.The issue was that he missed basically the entire year with a hamstring injury, an injury that had been recurring and that he had missed games with over the past couple of years. I admit that at the end of an 18-week hamstring injury I thought he did not have another two years in him.
Yes, but they weren't 31/32 with muscle wear-and-tear issues.because other players havent missed seasons or multiple seasons. we even recruited two players in McIntosh and Rivers who had more then a season out with injury problems that had been recurring for years. then their is Menzel, Vardy, Cowan etc.
So if he's injured,don't play him.Simple.If he has back problems as many seem to think, it wasn't a bad call. He was effective when he came on..but he certainly looks a little restricted to me.
And SJ didn't. Case closed I would have thought.I'll grant you that and it makes me a touch hypocritical but Chapman was offered a contract and didn't wish to accept it. For a trade to be completed, both parties need to agree... Chapman did.
So if he's injured,don't play him.Simple.
In a game decided by a small margin,why have 1 of our only game breakers sitting on his ass on the bench.
Now there's a revolutionary idea!
Bomber on 360 seemed a bit perplexed as to why SJ was the sub and asked if anyone had got to the bottom of why he wore the vest.
Has gone on to suggest (seemingly anecdotally) that our older players are dropping off possibly due to diminished motivation as the only reason players in their twilight play on is for premiership success and that unlike the other 'old' lists (Freo, Haw and Syd) who have veterans playing well because they're still in the window while we're not.
I'd have to say that it seems very feasible for that to be the case, but he also said it's hard to manage as you can't get rid of them all at once.
Has gone on to suggest (seemingly anecdotally) that our older players are dropping off possibly due to diminished motivation as the only reason players in their twilight play on is for premiership success and that unlike the other 'old' lists (Freo, Haw and Syd) who have veterans playing well because they're still in the window while we're not.