Certified Legendary Thread Winged Guernsey Petition/Letter - #ReturnTheWings: WINGS RETURNED, PERIL RETURNED - JOB DONE!

[Bacon Warrior]

I'm ready to burn the tripanel in front of WCE's Victorian office if that helps?

Just leave an un-burnt wings jumper too so they don't think it's an attack on the club.

 

[Milenko]

Just leave an un-burnt wings jumper too so they don't think it's an attack on the club.

I was going to build a shrine to the wings. It will sit atop a golden pedestal.

 

[LeCrassic]

If this goes through, I definitely think the club should put on some beers for us at subi.

 

[Clint Beastwood]

If this goes through, I definitely think the club should put on some beers for us at subi.

We should shout Gary a beer if it gets through.

 

[LeCrassic]

We should shout Gary a beer if it gets through.

Yeah I'll grab him one from the open bar

 

[wing it]

I didn't realise, but the gold clash won't be coming in for 2016, regardless of the vote. (according to a tweet reply from Gary)

 

[larrikin]

I didn't realise, but the gold clash won't be coming in for 2016, regardless of the vote. (according to a tweet reply from Gary)

Has something changed?

 

[wing it]

Has something changed?

I don't know how to embed Tweets properly, so I'll just quote...

"we said navy home away jumper the same and yellow clash isn't that correct?"

"vote is on navy wings v tri panel. Yellow clash could happen later"

 

[happy_eagle]

I don't know how to embed Tweets properly, so I'll just quote...

"we said navy home away jumper the same and yellow clash isn't that correct?"

"vote is on navy wings v tri panel. Yellow clash could happen later"

There is also this


Suggests that the Navy Wings + Peril are two seperate issues. As long as whatever decides the Peril is solved by early next year, we should see it in 2016

 

[wing it]

Happy_eagle, are you able to very quickly tell me how to embed tweets like that?

 

[happy_eagle]

Happy_eagle, are you able to very quickly tell me how to embed tweets like that?

just copy the link to the tweet and paste it
Link can be gotten by clicking on the tweet or its date

 

[wing it]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/Stoker49">@Stoker49</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/tweetiebeattie">@tweetiebeattie</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ReturnTheWings">@ReturnTheWings</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BigFootyEagles">@BigFootyEagles</a> vote is re home Wings but if club wants YellowWings clash could it happen in 2016?</p>&mdash; Scott Baggaley (Oak) (@sjames79) <a href="">September 17, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[oak79]

"

Response from Gary:

@sjames79 possible but tackling it one issue at a time

So, Yellow can still happen in 2016. That's just not what this vote is about. Which we already knew.

 

[MIKE85]

I didn't realise, but the gold clash won't be coming in for 2016, regardless of the vote. (according to a tweet reply from Gary)

For now I'd be happy with wings home and away, even if we have to see the clash a few times a year, like how the hawks do it

 

[larrikin]

I suspect changing the clash would be a slightly easier issue, assuming the AFL accept yellow as a clash colour.

 

[MIKE85]

Didn't puma say a while back that the clash was being discussed or something like that??

 

[E92_]

I suspect changing the clash would be a slightly easier issue, assuming the AFL accept yellow as a clash colour.

It has to be allowed, if they say no to it we can just do what Richmond do and put yellow side panels on the royal/navy.



You can't say no to a jumper that clashes with no one and at the same time say yes to a jumper that is 90% the same as their home jumper and still doesn't fix several clashes.


But this is the AFL we're talking about...

 

[HoneyBadger35]

I believe they mentioned they were seperate in the meeting, but he suggested the AFL could be alright with it because its going back to an old jumper. Wishful thinking or do others feel they said the same?

 

[MKMatty]

Isn't the clash currently up for debate? maybe the peril is coming back before the navy?

 

[wing it]

I believe they mentioned they were seperate in the meeting, but he suggested the AFL could be alright with it because its going back to an old jumper. Wishful thinking or do others feel they said the same?

Now that you mention it, I do recall that.

 

[wing it]

Isn't the clash currently up for debate? maybe the peril is coming back before the navy?

I'm almost certain we are stuck with the current line-up for 2015.

 

[MKMatty]

I'm almost certain we are stuck with the current line-up for 2015.

23 more games... I guess I can handle that

 

[lmach]

It has to be allowed, if they say no to it we can just do what Richmond do and put yellow side panels on the royal/navy.



You can't say no to a jumper that clashes with no one and at the same time say yes to a jumper that is 90% the same as their home jumper and still doesn't fix several clashes.


But this is the AFL we're talking about...

Richmond could get away with an all black clash jumper if they wanted to.

 

[wing it]

Richmond could get away with an all black clash jumper if they wanted to.

Well, from a selfish point of view, hopefully the Richmond clash policy remains as is. In 2016 we would therefore get to see the Eagles in royal or gold wings at home!

 

[Milenko]

Well, from a selfish point of view, hopefully the Richmond clash policy remains as is. In 2016 we would therefore get to see the Eagles in royal or gold wings at home!

Rest assured, with the AFL in charge, logic will not prevail.