Usage for hash tag: 2,

...health factors, there's probably enough protection for you anyway if you get it. If you're dreading it based upon a poor reaction to #2, then putting it off will probably not have that much of an impact. There's nothing wrong with waiting until it's effectively mandated by...

Wiggles #1, Beiber #2, tragic stuff

...inside the house, an air-conditioned bedroom and a swimming pool are my only specs. And I have both with a bonus only 300m from the beach so I'm a happy camper in Perth summer. Bonus #2, 3 and 4 is a big TV in the outdoor area with a fully stocked beer fridge and plenty of Big Bash. :cool::p

If your argument was that Redmayne is an "opener", then why does it matter if she is selected in a batting position other #1 or #2, which you said would "upset the balance of the team." ? Furthermore, I was expressing my disappointment that Redmayne was not selected when Haynes was unavailable...

...people, not disloyal but, appreciation, and with football teams the same, the histories and figures of their past. Why i always had Dolphins as #2, and Lions due to Sanders, and Bears for their tough D and aggro, and silly things like Bengals for their striped helmets and up against the giant...

...absence of spontaneous behaviour change in the face of rising case numbers There's already plenty of doubt on #1, there are plans in place for #2, #3 is already rolling out and at capacity (currently only limited by available doses), and #5 will probably eventuate to a degree. #4 is about...

I was all for Highmore getting #2, but I've really warmed to the idea of leaving it vacant "IF" we are confident of picking up Bing, because I think he'd look great in 2

He is a free agent, so unless Collingwood finish outside the bottom ten I don't think they trade him if they don't want him. There will be a club that offers enough for band one for Jordan. Pies could lose Moore and DeGoey and walk into the draft next season with picks #2, #3 and #4

He is very stiff that 3 interstate clubs hold picks #2, #3 and #4 and that there is one other player in the country better than him.

...position? Or do they now prioritise someone like Hobbs, who's the best pure inside midfielder in the draft? Do they try and trade up to our pick #2, or trade back for two picks, or just take an academy selection such as Will Bella? If looking for two picks, they might consider Hawks with...

...would effectively allow themselves to do what they're actually doing this year. Getting one of the best players in the draft for a handful of F2, F3 and R3 picks. A fantastic deal. If they still had #2, they'd just protect it by either trading with North and up, or trading it into 2022...

...our first pick and our second. If we take Callaghan with our first pick, we certainly wouldn't take a second midfielder. If we traded down from #2, then we'll take someone like Andrew, Gibcus or Rachele, so I expect we then would look to get a mid with our second pick. Johnson surely will be...

...most we'd get is a swap of our future first round picks for a swap of their #4 for our #2. That sets us up for a fall if we don't do well in 2022, or Crows rebound greatly, but you'd still expect them to finish below GWS so would provide a small benefit. If we were prepared for Callaghan and...

...oppo looks like being a contender next year, or maybe a 2nd + 4th from an oppo we perceive as less ambitious in 2022. 2) GWS take Callaghan at #2, Ward and Hobbs are gone by #7, but Andrew is still there. This might tempt GWS to cough up #13 and a 2022 1st rounder to grab Andrew at #7, maybe...

I still think the Bulldogs are the clear #2, despite the lop-sided GF result. For the record, both the Cats and Tigers - if they make finals - are just making up numbers. On a semi-related note, it's a small note of pride that we don't allow ourselves to tumble the ladder in our poorer years...

...not listening to me. Of course I know better than most of those douches... I would rate the Packers at #3 (or more equal second) Bills #1, Buccs #2, Packers #3. Good teams still have bad games, sometimes they win them, often they don't. Its only when it starts to happen more often that you'd...

...in later rounds. Everyone seemed to have focussed on GWS liking Mac Andrews and think we're just zeroed in on selecting him & so will trade #2, but we've actually said (or been reported) at various time about liking Callaghan, Gibcus, Rachele and Mac Andrew. I daresay there are others that...

Refer to post #2, some very astute person has already reached that conclusion.

There's talk of #2 and #13 There's also talk of #4 and #33 for #6 and #19 So maybe it's #6 and #19 for #4 and #33 with #4 and #8 going to GWS for #2 and #13 That makes it #6, #8 and #19 for #2, #13 and #33

We can't take everyone we like! Whether it's pick #2, #3, #4 or #5!

...just four selections, leaving one free). Matching for Nick Daicos was always a no-brainer, we were lucky that it came at #3 rather than #1 or #2, so we saved some selections for earlier in the night than we might have thought. Daicos will probably start either forward or on a wing, but...

...All the main regions represented. NSW NRL licenses ought to aim for = Campbelltown, Wollongong, Newcastle, Penrith, Parramatta, Sydney, Sydney #2, Manly/Gosford. (8) NZ = Aukland, and either Christchurch or Wellington. (2) Rest of Australia = Canberra, Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide. (4)...

Or GWS actually select Finn Callaghan as the best available player with pick #2, and worry about getting a tall with #13, even if it's not Andrew. Callaghan would add to the quality of the GWS midfield ... and also he's not playing against us! Given the lack of game time over the last 2 years...

That's like saying "I should have become a millionaire, why didn't I do that?" Griz weren't trading #2, it was common knowledge. They and pretty much everyone else saw Morant as superior to the rest, including Barrett.

...closer to Foxborough than Boston is, and the Patriots already cover the area so yeah. 40. Milwaukee :heavymultiply: - If I wern't going Chicago #2, I would give it alot of time. But with Chicago #2, no. Cannibilising the area too much. Plus, the Packers are already Wisconsin's team. Not sure...

...the club is prepared to prioritise drafting someone else, and therefore of trading out pick #2. But I think they also want a decent return for #2, so if they don't get what they want, then I can envisage keeping it and taking ''best available'' (which I'm pretty sure Caruso has said is his go...

St Louis, San Diego, Chicago #2, Portland, Milwaukee, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, either Sacramento or Fresno. One for all eight divisions.

...Not doing so could open the door for the Haze or Stars, all three teams are locked at 2-1 in intra-division matchups. Whomever ends up in that #2, will be very difficult to beat out for that WC spot. Can the Berserkers claim their first division title?? Geecats07 RK Team W L T PCT GB...

...by trading #2 to someone further back. But while clubs want Callaghan, there seems to be a reluctance to pay for him. Taking Callaghan with #2, then trading using #13 and next year's first for say Andrew if they really want him is an option too. Hopefully no-one outside of Caruso and his...

My wife had hers' last week. Wasn't too much affected by # 1 or # 2 – but aches & pains & tiredness this time, which suggests to (non-medical) me that it is having some impact