Usage for hash tag: 7,

I think a little later in the season you might know what that pick will be worth. #7, or #8 might be terrible. Look at some of the #6-10 picks historically and imagine losing him for virtually nothing.

...I doubt our ability to win 2 big away finals. My rough ratings at the moment would be Richmond #1, Dogs #2, Port #3, Geelong #4, WC #5, Bris #6, Melb #7, GWS #8, Sydney #9. I think we can beat anyone at home, just not sure about our capacity against a couple of the top contenders away from...

That's magic news. He did the #7 proud tonight, in fact, ever since he's worn the #7, even if his form has been off a bit, his commitment and attack on the ball and the player with the ball, his courage has been #7 like.

If the board fell as it did, I think the Lions find a trade partner looking to trade up to get Landry Fields before the Panthers can. In which case, the DeVonta Smith slide would keep going

If you think back to the 2019 AFL Draft where Fremantle held pick #7, #8 and then bits and pieces - Adelaide held the pick before us at #6 and decided to reach for the tall in McAsey which meant both Young and Serong made it through to #7 and #8. That isn't so good for Adelaide.

Given that its down to #7, Lambert has yet to be named.. she's a top 5 player in the league imo, so her name would be close to the top.

No you will not take #7, but you can take a long walk off a short pier.

Was thinking #7, will inform next week 👍

...for Paine as he only played 4 tests till the age of 33, but he is the same batsmen now that he has ever been. Steady, will reliably chip in at #7, not going to break a game open but on the odd occasion he'll knock up a good score. Even if he played uninterrupted from debut to now his batting...

Looking forward to Downie receiving #11 next season, and Maginess #7, and a starring revelation in Brockman receive #23.

For me Geelong numbers were always #5, #7, #26 and #35.

Daicos has moved to #7, Reef takes over #26.

Breaking News.... Hearing the Bombers are heavy into #1 draft pick from the Crows for the Bombers first 2 picks #7,#8! Whom would the Bombers be targeting with pick 1?

...#63 (2365 points)(1097 after #12) Assuming that the rankings of academy players taken before our picks plays out as: Ugle-Hagan #1, Campbell #7, Jones #10, McInnes #11 Then... our picks look like when the time comes for us to first choose: #16, #33, #46, #47, #53 (2510 points)(1443 after...

There's been a few big ones Fevola & #27 for #12 & L Henderson (recent pick 5) Tom Boyd for #6 & R Griffen (AA & B&F mid) Treloar & #28 for #7, F1 & #65 Lever, #35 & F3 for #10, F1 & F4 Gibbs, F2, F3 & #77 for #10, #16, #73 & F2 Wingard & F3 for #15, #35, F4 and Burton (recent pick 19)...

It would all depend on North thinking the player they get at #2 isn't worth as much as the players taken at #7, #8, #14. They could go into the draft with #7, #8, #11, #14, #70, #71 Bulldogs go in with #2, #3 (big matching with #28, #30, #41 and #54) with a first round surplus of 151 points...

...Blues give up: Gibbs, future second-round pick (swap in Adelaide's favour), future third-round pick Gibbs was 28. TRELOAR Collingwood give up: #7, future first-round pick GWS give up: Treloar, #28 Treloar was 22. SHIEL Essendon give up: #9, future first-round pick GWS give up: Shiel, future...

...for #26 + #31 (Preuss pick :drunk:) Higgins + #28 -> #20 + Constable #20 + #26 -> #8 (Dogs get for Dunkley) -> more points for them #2 -> #6, #7, Ess 2021 2RD Essendon 2021 2RD -> Dow (Carlton) North 2021 2Rd -> Stephenson (Collingwood) Outcome: Constable, Dow, Stephenson Draft picks: #6...

...have 607 points deficit for 2021, Sydney have 867 points deficit. Sydney in particular burns all their draft hand with a Campbell bid at #7, with a second bid coming. Expect Sydney to be very busy this trade period. Either securing more second/third round picks or moving on their 2021 first...

Would you really want to keep a player that doesn't want to be there? We made that mistake and then lost Joe. We did get #7, but it could have been this year's #5 instead. But it's the desire you're after. Would rather get #7 and use it on a player that actually wants to be a part of our...

...want to give up #25, then they don't want Brown. Brady, be very public about this. I know FA works differently but in a world where Daniher is #7, Williams is #10 and Adelaide think Crouch is worth #2, Brown is worth #25 PLUS extras. Brown isn't one of us at the moment. He wants to play for...

...From first game, replacing Egan, to last game. The in between games have given us much joy and stability. Definitely close to our best ever #7, (tough call as Couchy also a favourite) and one of those players that in years to come will always bring a smile to your face just thinking about...

Understand the logic, but NAH! Need to get a 3rd (and even a 4th) team in the mix.....if we give up #7, we need to get a lot more than 25 back. Does Dodo really want to risk getting nada for Saad?

They can have #7, PROVIDING they send us back #15 to #18......minimum.

Here it is: GWS were given #1, #3, #5, #7, #9, #11, #13, #15, Phil Davis, Rhys Palmer, Callan Ward, Tom Scully then access to Bugg, Cameron, Darley, Golds, Growden (easy Joao ), Harding, Hombsch, Shiel, Treloar, Tunbridge, Ugle, Wilson, Shaun Edwards, Hampton, Aylett, Josh Bruce, Sam Schulz...

That is bizarre logic, Carlton could take him with Pick #7, so Essendon should accept an offer less than Pick 7.

For Cats to trade #13 and #16 (if they lose this week) for #7, we'd need to throw in our 3rd, not our 2nd. #7 + #27 is worth more than #13 + #16

Has to be a 2 year deal nomination. Unless there's a draftee we're desperate on at #7, I think we're better off splitting that pick, and taking Saad in the National draft. Less risky than the PSD this year.

Is Dodoro / * delusional, in denial, or dumb...? If they are asking for pick #7, plus something, the reality is that at worst case scenario (which we most likely won't do), is for Saad to nominate for national draft, and we pick him with pick #7, and * get nothing... On top of that, The...

In the case that we couldn't trade it down, we're better off taking him in the draft at #7, rather than giving * #7 in a trade. * *