...two year contract and then would request a trade back to WA and West Coast believing that Freo would trade out pick #19 for him to last to their two second round picks.
I expect that if we had #6, #7 and #8 we would have taken the same three players with our first three selections in the draft.
I want to know why Bairstow was allowed to bat at #6, given that he was off the field for the entire Australian 2nd innings?
My understanding was that players weren't allowed to bat until the same time had expired that they spent off the field, or at #7 - whichever happens first. The...
If we had #6, #8, #19 and the two picks in the 60s then we can take five players this draft.
So I'd be aiming at Johnson at #21, then holding out for a Benning bid or picking Jai Serong when our next pick comes up
...& Darcy bids it's less, but the point is guaranteed access to Callaghan), Freo would want #6 + #8 for #2 + #13. The problem there is that at #6, all 4 of our evenly-rated players may be gone. Hawks have been linked to Andrew, so even though I think they should be taking a midfielder, perhaps...
...- plenty of options to complement Callaghan.
Adelaide can't get Callaghan anyway as they won't trade a F1R, so get a pretty good option at #6, and their late 2R pick comes into the coveted pick #19.
GWS get two picks inside the top 10, even after pushback. Obviously miss out on Callaghan...
There's talk of #2 and #13
There's also talk of #4 and #33 for #6 and #19
So maybe it's #6 and #19 for #4 and #33 with #4 and #8 going to GWS for #2 and #13
That makes it #6, #8 and #19 for #2, #13 and #33
#22 and #27 can't both be outs because #27 was turned into #22 with a F3.
So our position is:
In: #6, #19, #61, #69, F4 (Geel), Clark and Brodie
Out: Cerra, #27, F2, F3, F4
What's crazy to me is how often the older generations changed numbers. I get it for captaincy, but take Gordon Coventry: he wore #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #22 and #29 over his career! Imagine Buddy Franklin changing his jumper number every other year :P
This.
To make it perfectly clear, lets try and ground this in reality. There's multiple top end father sons in both years likely to effect things.
You can bookmark this for review next year, but it's likely the offer ends up being something like:
#1, #24
for
#6, #5, #20
...So if the late picks we have sums to more points than pick #23 then we could trade for it.
Assuming we use #22 on Clark we'd then be able to use #6, #8, #19 and #23 at the draft. #23 would also give us more options assuming we trade #19 on the second day. Obviously those 60s picks come in...
If GWS have come to Freo with the trade and the player wants it, nail them to the wall on trade price.
To the absolute wall.
#2, #6, #8, #19, #22 will do just fine.
Cerra and F3 for #6 and F2
F2 to GCS for Brodie and #19
That would be:
Cerra and F3 for #6, #19, Brodie
That's not horrible. But it's all depending on GC selling the world for a song.
If our main draft picks are #6, #8 and #19 then I don't see a problem with that.
Especially when we have also added two former first round picks to the squad in Clark and Brodie.
We would be adding basically five extra first round picks to the squad in one off season.
Not sure we'd be willing to trade out of F2, F3 and F4 but...
Trade 1: Carlton #6, #25, #52 <-> Cerra, F3, F4
Trade 2: Collingwood #22, #78 <-> #27, #52
Trade 3: Geelong Clark <-> #22
Trade 4: GCS Brodie, #19 <-> F2
Go to draft with #6, #8, #19, #25, #78
Not expecting this to happen btw.
Depends on the order of the trades. Get #25 out of Carlton for the Cerra trade. Throw that over for Clark (and a later pick swap if they are still being difficult). Then get #19 with a GC player. Then get #22 from Pies.
Hopefully #6, #8, #19, #22 to go to the draft with.
There was a suggestion on the Freo board that went like this:
Freo throw in Cerra, #27, future 3rd
Dogs put in Young and #17
Carlton send #6, #25
Freo walk out with #6 and #17
Dogs get #25, #27, future 3rd
Carlton get Cerra and Young
#7 for Lobb?
#6, #7, #8, #25
The Lions would come to us about Neale if we had three top ten picks and top three current picks would be in range to trade for.
... but I'd rather three top ten picks than one top five pick.
I'd prefer we go in with two top 10 picks, one second rounder, then Benning for a junk pick. Then we would have an opening or two for the Rookie draft and MSD?
#6,#8,#27,#81 (thanks Taylor)
And keep our full range of draft picks for next year.
If it's a straight swap of Cerra for #6 and #25 with #25 going to Geelong for Clark (it might end up #25 and #27 to Geelong for Clark and one of #30/32/34 they hold, effectively downgrading #27 with it by a bit)
We would have #6, #8, #27 and #81
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.