Usage for hash tag: 9,

  1. CharlieKelly

    List Mgmt. Player List Management 2019-20

    ...club swooped in at the Rookie Draft and picked them up instead, happy to be corrected So, that said, this is our list situation now... In 2019, we had 47 players, 40 senior listed, 5 rookies (including Sutcliffe mid-season addition) and 2 Category B rookies Jack Trengove, Matthew...
  2. HARKER

    List Mgmt. Pick 9

    I couldn't care less for next years second, but am glad we didn't allow next years first to leave us, given the options we had. It will be important. Everything tells me that if we are to move on our #9, it will be to Gold Coast. we'll see.
  3. HARKER

    Analysis 2019 List Management Discussion II

    ...we'll have the following - Main List - 36 Rookie A - 3 Rookie B - 1 Hard to see us reeling in another DFA, so dependent on what we do with the #9, it seems to me as though we're more likely than not to finish with a 40/4/1 split. If we do split that #9, it's almost definite that we'll...
  4. HARKER

    List Mgmt. Pick 9

    ...your viewpoint. What else do you see? I'm not as interested in the numbers as for the opportunities. If we don't have a clear target with the #9, why wouldn't we chance at two picks under 20 if we feel there may be something worthwhile there? We've already moved on plenty and need to...
  5. HARKER

    List Mgmt. Pick 9

    ...a deal of sorts with what should now be their trading enemy. Can anyone else see a deal being done here where we give up #9 and a future 2nd/3rd for #15 & #20? Unless the CFC have a really good idea they'll be getting the player they want at #9, then this scenario could be quite a good one...
  6. Coona Blues

    List Mgmt. Carlton's 2019 Draft Thread

    ...partners? Brisbane could bring us #16 and #34 for 9/43, Geelong either #14 and #36 or #17 and #24 with some other swaps, Gold Coast chasing #9, but doubtful we could attain #15 and #20 in return. Perhaps Hawthorn's #11 and 30/42 if they want to get ahead of a McGinness bid. Port have #12, #18...
  7. Bamboo Harvester

    Analysis 2019 List Management Discussion II

    ...cut of his jib, reminds me of a Liam Ryan. Just a thought...if the players we are targeting in the ND have already been selected before pick #9, should consider brokering a deal with GCS...our pick #9 for 2019 pick #20, and their 2020 second round pick (likely again to be pick #20 before...
  8. Bamboo Harvester

    List Mgmt. Pick 9

    Kemp is da man for mine.....if he's still available at #9, would be a great win imo. If we ended up bringing in Eddie, Pitto, Jack, Kemp....and hopefully jag a Sokol or Riccardi with a later pick, I'll have a very happy christmas!!!
  9. Stamos

    Uncontracted Jack Martin [requested a trade to Carlton]

    After reneging, Suns obviously wanted #9, but Martin is not worth compromising a top 10 pick over.
  10. BluesRule

    Pick Swap 2019 - How Crow Can You Go?

    Or is it enhanced if it helps us to get Martin in PSD. We traded pick #4 for Stocker, #9, and by way of refusing to trade #9 to GCS we also get Martin gratis.
  11. Taylor

    Mega Thread 2019 List Management, Free Agency & Trade thread #2

    ...before Carlton. So we trade #10 for #9 (I don't hate the idea of trading our 2020 1st for #9 straight up) Then we trade #8 for #9 (unless we have secured #9 straight out, then we just swap #10 for #8) Then assuming Carlton/Melbourne bid on him with #10 we leave the draft with: #7, #8, #9, #10
  12. Magruder

    Bluemour Melting Pot XXI - Like seriously, the polar ice caps have got nothing on us

    It’s the real criticisms of Silvagni in this period. We allowed Sydney an option on #9, which really means Dodoro in this case. And... is it any surprise that Scot Lucas would push the Papley to * approach.
  13. Stamos

    Bluemour Melting Pot XXI - Like seriously, the polar ice caps have got nothing on us

    Just as an example of a possibility, Geelong may have a player they love and want to move #14 up to #9, so they give us #24 for #57? Something like that. But if a player we love slides to 9 (eg Caldwell and Stocker last year), I doubt we trade down.
  14. Stamos

    Bluemour Melting Pot XXI - Like seriously, the polar ice caps have got nothing on us

    Hypothetically, there could be very little splitting who is 'best available' #9, and who is at whatever pick we slide to. Alternatively, given how clubs will rate players differently, it might be exactly the same kid on our list.
  15. Stamos

    Bluemour Melting Pot XXI - Like seriously, the polar ice caps have got nothing on us

    Sometimes we put too much relevance on the points. There might be a big difference in getting who we want at #9, compared to #16, so you can’t just look at it as the points differential. Our future 2nd by itself should have been enough. Throwing in a 3rd was already decent overs for an out of...
  16. wayToGo_

    Mega Thread 2019 List Management, Free Agency & Trade thread #2

    If we get all the 1st round picks then no-one else can bid. #7, #8, #9, #10 thanks Belly. If he can't achieve that then I think we need to let him go.
  17. T

    Analysis 2019 List Management Discussion II

    You’d think that Newnes will be looked at now with another list spot to fill. Hoping that Martin is a PSD pickup. #9, 43, 57 & 70 at the draft (if not packaged up on draft night, or before to jump up the queue a little further). Deluca likely to get another run at it.
  18. Taylor

    Mega Thread 2019 List Management, Free Agency & Trade thread #2

    I agree, but it might need to be in 2020 because pick #7, #9, #10 and Henry (with Acres, Aish) might have already filled up our available spots. A pick in the 50s might not do a thing for us
  19. Vindicater

    Contracted Joe Daniher [RFA in 2020, has requested a trade to Sydney]

    At the moment yes. But when we get #5, #9, Parker and Blakely for Daniher we will all hail the mighty Dodo
  20. Taylor

    Mega Thread 2019 List Management, Free Agency & Trade thread #2

    Three 2020 second round picks... hmm.. If we can bump off two of those for another first this year that would make the trade: Langdon, Hill, 2020 3rd for #10, #11, Aish, Acres Which isn't so bad. Even sending all three for a pick inside pick #10. Maybe #7, #9, #10

Top Bottom