Your joking right. Young ruckmen who can lead the ruck are worth there weight in gold. Why would we want Schulz (and don't say hes from SA or he's a forward)
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Jonathon Griffin asks for a trade
- Thread starter Big Cox
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Your joking right. Young ruckmen who can lead the ruck are worth there weight in gold. Why would we want Schulz (and don't say hes from SA or he's a forward)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Banned
- #130
have you checked your calendar, you realise we have just finished season 2008.
a lot has changed since 2006.
Schulz attracted a 2nd rounder from Port last year(dp28) and we knocked them back.
He has improved plenty this year and is now likely worth more than that. In fact I still think he is a required player at Richmond but there is rumour that he wants to get back to SA.
How about we attach a third rounder to sweeten the deal.
Schulz + third rounder for Jon Griffin.
why is he worth more ? because he is one year closer to retirement or because you did a wolverine experiment on him and made his bones lined with Gold?
Even more of a reason to steer clear. Rodan was not a required player and look how his career has taken off since leaving Tigerland.
Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
Then why is he playing in the SANFL compared to Schultz who is in the AFL.
its called injury
the kept him running incase one of Moran, Tippet or Maric went down. I think he has had the surgery already
All jokes aside and by the way i would like to trade my dog for your best players but in the end I belive we will trade players.
Not a bad solution really as I dont belive Griffin will be a player and if Richmond traded Danny Myer who I belive would be a fair trade, who knows who would be the winner in the end.
Not a bad solution really as I dont belive Griffin will be a player and if Richmond traded Danny Myer who I belive would be a fair trade, who knows who would be the winner in the end.
Not saying you had any credibility to start with, but if you did, you wouldn't now.
Because Shultz got drafted by Richmond?
Had a hip injury which kept him from performing as he did in the first half of the year
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #141
Fremantle have offerd Mr Griffin a 3 year deal worth over 300k per season and he has informed Adelaide of his intentions to move to Fremantle. Richmond have now missed out on both Warnock and Griffin despite being the one firmly after them at the beginning.
Working out a trade will be difficult. Freos pick 21 will be a starting point.
Working out a trade will be difficult. Freos pick 21 will be a starting point.
Being contracted, I'd suggest he may have asked to be traded.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #143
Griffin isnt as noble and as good a bloke as he looks. He is happy to sulk and moan till he gets his way. Infact its all hes done since he lost his spot. Adelaide will reluctantly do the deal because they dont want to witness the aftermath
Griffin won't be a player, you're kidding me. I've always thought he'd turn out the best out of the young ruckmen at Adelaide. He'll be a superstar in 4-5 years, mark my words.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
People have short memories.
For the first 8 games of the season, Griff was widely touted as the best young ruck in the League.
He got injured and ran out of steam, but he was kicking arse.
I'll be pissed if we lose him, because I think he will be one of the Premier Rucks in the comp; so I just hope we get a got deal for him.
$300k per annum would be hard to say no to though; especially when you're going home.
He's contracted.
Not only is it illeagle to contact contracted players that are out of contract this year, but to actually offer a contract to a player who has over a year on his deal is very bad.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #147
Proving it is nigh on impossible and Adelaide arnt exactly crying over it
Janus
Advocatus Diaboli
- Sep 9, 2007
- 23,430
- 57,318
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys, Chicago Bulls
If that's true, the Crows are better off without such a petulant child. Nothing disrupts clubs more than the cancer of a player who doesn't want to be there...
Genuinely sorry for Adelaide if it is the case, though. Griffin looked to be a solid prospect for them.
Genuinely sorry for Adelaide if it is the case, though. Griffin looked to be a solid prospect for them.
This whole rumour is coming from one poster, i'm yet to see anything to validate the rumours and we're in a good possy if he does want to go.
He's still contracted meaning we get top value or he can have fun in the SANFL watching his value fall.
But, I believe he is a required player at Adelaide.
He was our #1 ruck until injury hit. Surgury wasn't taken up as we only have 2 true ruckman, thus he played out the year injured in the SANFL as a back up policy, kind of harsh but he would have missed 90% of the remainder of the season anyway and we wouldn't have had a back up.
He's athletic and a very good tap ruckman. Can go forward and it rather impressive leading up at the ball.
Needs a better aerobic capacity to becaome the player he can be as well as about 10 kg.
With the added weight his body will hold up to the season rather than break down as we saw this year.
With the increased aerobic capacity we'll see him being more damaging around the ground. He has a booming right root on him and thus send it to damgerous spots inside 50.
Very exciting young prospect and i'd much rather we retain him.
How the **** would you know what Griffin is like personally you ****ing joke of a troll?
Thats one of the silliest thing ive ever heard on here
