Remove this Banner Ad

Hewitt is a hack

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Furn

Furn

Premiership Player
Veteran
Jul 12, 2006
4,980
279
Melbourne
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Seriously if this guy isnt the worst no1 the world has ever seen then im Margaret Thatcher!

Won a couple of slams in the worst period of mens tennis ever. Somehow got to no1, but what can he do ?

Get the ball back and hope you have an off night. Fed is good but he aint that good!


If you could beat Leyton Hackit sign below.

Furn
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If Hewitt's a hack for being beaten in straight sets by arguably the "greatest" player of all time, then what about the players Hewitt beat to get where he is?

If he's a hack, give me a description of them please?

And as if you could beat him, did you read in the paper how Hewitt has been playing sets against the young Aussie kid (name escapes me) who lost in 4 in the first round, and Hewitt has been winning 6-0, 6-1.

You wouldn't win more then 2-3 points a set of Hewitt.

Still a great Australian sportsman, after all, if Hewitt is a hack, so must Rafter and Cash be for winning only a GS or two.

What a joke.:thumbsdown:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Nah id beat him and the hacks paid to lose to him.

He's got nothing.

He is sooooo bad!!

Give me that forehand to my forehand and id put it either side of him and id tell him which way i was gonna send it 1st! he still wouldnt get near it

ordinary at best.

at worst a poor womans player.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
He's no good

he's built up lke he's a legend yet he's a disgrace to players like Laver and Rosewall.

Rafter would beat him left handed with a blind fold over one eye and a pole up his ass after 15 bourbons.
 
In neither of his GS wins did he beat a top 4 seed. Coupled with the weak period in which he 'dominated' I think it's very fair to call him one of the most overrated players of the modern era. Does he ever beat top players in Grand Slams? He is lauded as a hero cause he always defeats no name players in dramatic five setters but yet again he fails against a top player.
 
Leo Barry You Star said:
In neither of his GS wins did he beat a top 4 seed. Coupled with the weak period in which he 'dominated' I think it's very fair to call him one of the most overrated players of the modern era. Does he ever beat top players in Grand Slams? He is lauded as a hero cause he always defeats no name players in dramatic five setters but yet again he fails against a top player.
Click to expand...

Defeated the fifth seeded Del Potro in straight sets at Wimbledon last year.
 
problem is hewitt cant hit winners for shit
all he does is gets the ball back over the net
which isnt going to be good enough against the firepower of the top 10 players
 

Remove this Banner Ad

A very good, not great player who gets the best out of himself.

If Phillopousis (sp?) had half the application and attitude Hewitt has he would have been an all time great.

I don't understand why people hate him, hate the people who hype him up instead.
 
Leo Barry You Star said:
I sincerely hope that isn't the only example you can come up with
Click to expand...

First that came to mind.

I actually agree with you, by the way. Hewitt is a good player, but he simply isn't good enough to match the top players. Hence why he has been beaten by Federer on the last fifteen occasions. I don't really think that's his fault. I'm sure he's trying his best; however, his game just isn't at the level of a Nadal or Federer and never will be.

It's not a case of Hewitt having the talent to beat the top players and wasting it. He just isn't good enough, plain and simple.
 
Atheist said:
First that came to mind.

I actually agree with you, by the way. Hewitt is a good player, but he simply isn't good enough to match the top players. Hence why he has been beaten by Federer on the last fifteen occasions. I don't really think that's his fault. I'm sure he's trying his best; however, his game just isn't at the level of a Nadal or Federer and never will be.

It's not a case of Hewitt having the talent to beat the top players and wasting it. He just isn't good enough, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

yeah im not blaming him. I actually think he's a good bloke and gets a raw deal as far as his personality is concerned, but he is a very ordinary tennis player and i could beat him thats all im saying. and i havent had a hit 10 years.
 
Furn said:
Seriously if this guy isnt the worst no1 the world has ever seen then im Margaret Thatcher!

Won a couple of slams in the worst period of mens tennis ever. Somehow got to no1, but what can he do ?

Get the ball back and hope you have an off night. Fed is good but he aint that good!


If you could beat Leyton Hackit sign below.

Furn
Click to expand...

Furn said:
Nah id beat him and the hacks paid to lose to him.

He's got nothing.

He is sooooo bad!!

Give me that forehand to my forehand and id put it either side of him and id tell him which way i was gonna send it 1st! he still wouldnt get near it

ordinary at best.

at worst a poor womans player.
Click to expand...

Furn said:
He's no good

he's built up lke he's a legend yet he's a disgrace to players like Laver and Rosewall.

Rafter would beat him left handed with a blind fold over one eye and a pole up his ass after 15 bourbons.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't you be in bed , junior ???
Seriously , get educated in tennis sonny
:rolleyes:
 
Furn said:
Seriously if this guy isnt the worst no1 the world has ever seen then...!
Click to expand...

Comfortably better than Rios, Ferrero, Muster and Moya, and that's just off the top of my head.

Furn said:
Fed is good but he aint that good!
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

Leo Barry You Star said:
In neither of his GS wins did he beat a top 4 seed. Coupled with the weak period in which he 'dominated' I think it's very fair to call him one of the most overrated players of the modern era. Does he ever beat top players in Grand Slams? He is lauded as a hero cause he always defeats no name players in dramatic five setters but yet again he fails against a top player.
Click to expand...

He had a pretty tough draw at the US open in 2001. Beat 5 seeded players, (Portas, Haas, Roddick, Kafelnikov and Sampras), as well as Gustaffson (former top 10) and James Blake.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Rohan25 said:
Comfortably better than Rios, Ferrero, Muster and Moya, and that's just off the top of my head.

all easily better.

:rolleyes:

He had a pretty tough draw at the US open in 2001. Beat 5 seeded players, (Portas, Haas, Roddick, Kafelnikov and Sampras), as well as Gustaffson (former top 10) and James Blake.
Click to expand...

1.all the above are better than lewton.



2.Fed doesnt come Close to McEnroe the greatest player ever.


3.1 good player there.
 
Furn said:
1.all the above are better than lewton.
Click to expand...

Hewitt has winning records against all of them, as well as a few other number 1's.


Furn said:
3.1 good player there.
Click to expand...

So Roddick and Kafelnikov - both former number 1s and GS champions-, do not qualify as "good"?

I'd say beating 3 former number 1's and a number 2(Haas) qualifies as a difficult draw.

You don't know anything about tennis Furn, stop pretending you do.
 
pepsi said:
So does anyone have a winning head to head record with McEnroe? And if someone does, are they better than him?
Click to expand...


Federor is 28. Only Borg had a wining reord against he great one in his prime, most of the wins were when mac was an old man.

Borg and Mac >anyone and my mum> hewitt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top