Remove this Banner Ad

Damage control: Yet another St.Kilda scandal Part 2

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I CBF looking up shit but is it legal for a 16 yr old to bonk 20+ or is it only legal if it was all done with a belief that the age was in fact 18+
 
I agree the photo was taken in Miami but can't believe how Nick just got out of bed. surely that photo is not of him just getting out of bed. Looks like he is posing and having some fun with Zac and Sam

The room in the picture looks nothing like the room in the Saints pictures . . . do you have one that looks similar?
 
I CBF looking up shit but is it legal for a 16 yr old to bonk 20+ or is it only legal if it was all done with a belief that the age was in fact 18+

Case earlier this year was thrown out because she led the players to believe she was 18-plus. Reasonable to assume that any relationship she may of had with these players was on the basis of this.
 
I feel a lot dumber now that I have watched her video.
 
Girl says she took the shots

St Kilda say they took the shots

So far SEN using StKilda's version of the truth as fact.

Waited until it seemed likely there wasn't Hawthorn pics after all before chiming in?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So do the media realise that Dal Santo also has a photo out there or not?

Also whats her actual age. Has it been confirmed or what. Some places it says 22, some people say 17
 
Honestly none of the photos matter, if there was a photo of Riewoldt and Dal Santo engaged in some consensual sodomy, it would not matter. It only matters if the photos were taking by a 16 yr old girl. And I think it's safe at this point to assume this girl is nothing but an attention seeking girl out for revenge and knows that these photos will hurt the club because we live in a sensationalist 'think of the children' world.

The girl shows all the signs of a massive liar, always holding off a little, little excuses. Until she proves she personally took the photos its all rubbish.
 
There nevertheless are two conflicting accounts and you can't simply report one as fact when you don't actually have the facts.

Pretty simple.

call me easily influenced but I'm going with the version that says they were taken in Miami as opposed to a house in Melbourne
 
Waited until it seemed likely there wasn't Hawthorn pics after all before chiming in?

I expected better and more even handed reporting.

Schwass on SEN actually said he was being fair and balanced by saying that Nick Riewoldt is partly to blame for Gilbert taking the shots. :rolleyes: The point however is that nobody knows for sure who took the pictures.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Case earlier this year was thrown out because she led the players to believe she was 18-plus. Reasonable to assume that any relationship she may of had with these players was on the basis of this.

Fair enough, so then futhermore even if these photos were taken by her (doubtful) then it has all ready been set that in that period she was effectively 18 in the laws eyes so regardless of what happens its a non story.

We all just wait around the door wanting to see more ****.
 
So do the media realise that Dal Santo also has a photo out there or not?

Also whats her actual age. Has it been confirmed or what. Some places it says 22, some people say 17

I heard her personally say somewhere that she was almost 18 now.

There is some collateral damage in this thread, comrades going down like flies with red cards all for the Dikileaks cause.
 
call me easily influenced but I'm going with the version that says they were taken in Miami.

It's basically been confirmed it was taken in Delano hotel, Miami. So reporting the shots were taken by Gilbert would be right, but it should be written that the girl (we can't say her name right?) claims different.
 
I expected better and more even handed reporting.

Schwass on SEN actually said he was being fair and balanced by saying that Nick Riewoldt is partly to blame for Gilbert taking the shots. :rolleyes: The point however is that nobody knows for sure who took the pictures.

Nick is partly to blame I agree.

The police are working with the football club and said players over theft of photo's from a players laptop, you work it out?
 
It's basically been confirmed it was taken in Delano hotel, Miami. So reporting the shots were taken by Gilbert would be right, but it should be written that the girl (we can't say her name right?) claims different.

Considering she has pretty clearly identified herself publicly and associated herself is this an issue? Her right to privacy is void when she publically announces it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top