Stadiums in WA/SA the capacity for the future

Remove this Banner Ad

The general public at Adelaide Oval, who?

How big is the SACA reserve?
How many in a reserve for SANFL members?
What is reserved for the members of the competing club?

Good luck if you are a humble footy fan wanting to rock up to a game.

SACA reserve is being put down for footy to 10? SANFL reserve is also around 10k

Thats 20k done, 1k is reserved for other teams interstate members, 29k for members and general public

I see your point
 
In Perth the Stadium should be around the 80,000 and have a Roof.That way you could use it for a variety of sports.

What a crazy idea. Only massive football (any code, disregarding NCAA) clubs would fill an 80k stadium. Australia doesn't have one massive club.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What a crazy idea. Only massive football (any code, disregarding NCAA) clubs would fill an 80k stadium. Australia doesn't have one massive club.

Collingwood would tend to disagree !!! :eek:

These stadiums have to satisfy the members of the clubs using them.
Eagles have 42k? with another 10k on a waiting list. Freo 38k. These numbers will only grow with the population. No third WA club pleez !
So 65k stadium with bones for 70k is fine for Perth.

Crows have 40 oddk members and regularly fill 52k Aami.
Port had 30k to a nothing-end-of-season game at AO. If they are doing well, they'll get 40 k easily. So AO at 60k sounds fine. Likewise, they can bid for Wallaby and Socceroo games. Population grows, members grow.
 
But Collingwood don't play their home games in Perth do they. :eek:
 
SACA reserve is being put down for footy to 10? SANFL reserve is also around 10k

Thats 20k done, 1k is reserved for other teams interstate members, 29k for members and general public

I see your point

Thanks.

Will the clubs reserve seating as they do in WA - what sort of numbers does each club reserve at WestLakes?

As an aside the footy media in Melbourne today are very impressed with the Adelaide Oval game over the weekend, answer to a maidens prayer. Just out of touch?
 
Thanks.

Will the clubs reserve seating as they do in WA - what sort of numbers does each club reserve at WestLakes?

As an aside the footy media in Melbourne today are very impressed with the Adelaide Oval game over the weekend, answer to a maidens prayer. Just out of touch?

Port and crows reserve a seat for all of their members at the moment (36k and 43k?)
 
Are these Crows/Port members real club members or do they join the SANFL & claim to support their clubs?

Beware free loaders e.g the Medallion Club at Etihad, the MCC/AFL members at the MCG.

This can happen:
ON the eve of its fourth straight finals series, St Kilda is set to post a loss of more than $1.5 million.
The Saints have reacted by requesting the AFL to schedule all home games next year at the MCG following another dismal year of match returns from their home venue at Etihad Stadium.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...at-mcg-next-year/story-e6frg7mf-1226130045706
 
Are these Crows/Port members real club members or do they join the SANFL & claim to support their clubs?

Beware free loaders e.g the Medallion Club at Etihad, the MCC/AFL members at the MCG.

This can happen:
ON the eve of its fourth straight finals series, St Kilda is set to post a loss of more than $1.5 million.
The Saints have reacted by requesting the AFL to schedule all home games next year at the MCG following another dismal year of match returns from their home venue at Etihad Stadium.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...at-mcg-next-year/story-e6frg7mf-1226130045706

I think the "real club members" for port is around 30k so 6k is POrt magpie, a SANFL membership just gives you a ticket into every AAMI Stadium game, don't know how it will work at AO
 
So how often do the US stadiums you refer to get used Pj,Rj,Hj ???

22 events per year (AFL footy in Perth) is low, too low I'd argue.

AFL footy pays all the bills at the MCG, with cricket drawing less & less in the crowds stakes - why Adelaide Oval needs footy.

Which is why the new stadium should be tied to a 3rd Perth team - and a capacity of 70,000 would be ideal.

What would a 3rd Perth team do?

Well, it would mean 33 matches per year.

It would also mean 6 Derbies per year that could all be expected to be close to sell-outs, if not sell-outs.

Adding the 3rd team would make a 70,000 seat stadium in Perth very very viable.
 
No, 3rd team for now.

22 AFL games + posssible finals.
Preseason games.

Wallabies Fixture

Western Force Fixture (finals or against Aussie rival)

Soccer Fixture

Special event / concerts

Function facilities built into the stadium used throughout the week.

Potential Hotel rooms during the week then converted to corporate suits on Game day.

70 000 capacity.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Which is why the new stadium should be tied to a 3rd Perth team - and a capacity of 70,000 would be ideal.

What would a 3rd Perth team do?

Well, it would mean 33 matches per year.

It would also mean 6 Derbies per year that could all be expected to be close to sell-outs, if not sell-outs.

Adding the 3rd team would make a 70,000 seat stadium in Perth very very viable.

Crazy talk, how low do you want the standard of the competition to get ?

More games in Perth should not be linked the # of teams.
North & the Eagles had an arrangement that would have put $700+k into Norths back pocket by transferring a loss making game for North @ Etihad into a winner for North & WA footy. Rejected by the AFL.

More games will improve the viability of a new stadium & increase WA footys claims to run the new stadium - we dont want a Vic style arrangement that greases the palms of ground managers at the expense of footy club members & fans. The new SA arrangement is little better.
 
Worth pointing out that in regards to the member numbers, that 10k+ In The Wings membership is a actually placeholder for a purchase of up to 2 adult and 2 children, so that 10k could be standing in for easily 20k more.

The people on that list who were getting 2011 membership offers were actually those who signed in *2005*. I joined the list in 2009 and am still thousands off the pace.

However, as has been infamously noted, there is a lot of hoarding of the memberships by people who have no hope of attending in the current season but can't stand to wait six years to regain memberships.

So, if we want crowds, on the Eagles side at least there is probably a viable ability to equal the Collingwood home crowds consistently (dunno about Freo though) and justify a stadium 70-80k.

The only thing that would be disappointing is that for the first couple years there would probably be more scope for other club supporters getting in; might lose some of the cauldron like 99% crowd support. Probably get some younger fans in to liven the crowds up though.

Just imagine how amazing the derby day crowds would look though...
 
By the time your 60k stadium is built in 5 years, you'll have nearly the same problems with memberships and people unable to see WC. I honestly can't believe it's only going to seat 60k - easily enough for Freo, but not for WC.
 
Thinking that AO oval will be the oval we needed for 2005-2015 not 2020 and beyond should be holding 55k-65k if Adeaide want to make a genuine mid for the commonwealth games
 
Thinking that AO oval will be the oval we needed for 2005-2015 not 2020 and beyond should be holding 55k-65k if Adeaide want to make a genuine mid for the commonwealth games

The Adelaide Oval site says "50 000 seated" which is different from Capacity. With the northern bank retained, 55 000 should be possible.

Over in WA Premier Colin Barnett has dropped the International Design competition for the Stadium in favour of the Tender process which is fair enough as there is still competition but within a realistic budget and it's the industry standard.

On the otherside we have the opposition (who were always far more pro Stadium than Barnett) calling on the Premier to dump the WA Stadium in favour of sending $Billions to Western Power for power grid modernisation.

http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/call-to-scrap-stadium-to-avoid-electricity-price-hikes-20110915-1kbmr.html#ixzz1Y5Ez3aeE

Call to scrap stadium to avoid electricity price hikes
Courtney Trenwith
September 16, 2011 - 2:00AM

The Opposition says the government should reassess its plan for a new stadium so it can fund an upgrade of the state's ageing electricity network and avoid further price increases...
 
I hate this state so much.

Sporting infrastructure should not be put in front of serious government projects. Hospitals are examples of this.

But I find the idea of scrapping a desperately needed stadium for an upgraded electricity network is absurd. Can we not afford both? Isn't Western Australia the fastest growing state in the country? Doesn't WA make up the majority of trade in Australia?

Absolutely infuriating. This backward state will never progress to its potential. Culture, arts, and sports are pretty integral to a good society. Yet these elements are always foregone.

Forever lagging.
 
I hate this state so much.

Sporting infrastructure should not be put in front of serious government projects. Hospitals are examples of this.

But I find the idea of scrapping a desperately needed stadium for an upgraded electricity network is absurd. Can we not afford both? Isn't Western Australia the fastest growing state in the country? Doesn't WA make up the majority of trade in Australia?

Absolutely infuriating. This backward state will never progress to its potential. Culture, arts, and sports are pretty integral to a good society. Yet these elements are always foregone.

Forever lagging.

One word: GSTallocationformula
 
And you will find during that time Victoria managed to build the MCG.

& used it for 2 x Olympics & 1 x Comm Games.
One day someone might relate the story of Perry Lakes Stadium built for the 1962 Comm Games
& the cricket ground in WA is not owned by the taxpayer unlike the MCG . The WACA is owned by the WACA, the Western Australian Cricket Association.

Amazing how a little research ...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top