Ochre
Stop the Steal!
2) He hasn't been in as good form as he's been perceived to be
Ding ding ding, we have a winner, but...
But very easy to stick one's head in the sand and pretend otherwise, of course. So much proof of that lately.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2) He hasn't been in as good form as he's been perceived to be
But very easy to stick one's head in the sand and pretend otherwise, of course. So much proof of that lately.
It means that his form has been dropping slightly, and that intensity has been dropping majorly.
And *thats* why I dont want him at GWS, not even for a seventh round pick.
He's an idiot, alright.
Irony lost on you?
Those two have been dropped as high profile players in recent memory.
Dal Santo was dropped by Lyon because he was setting an example that talent was not enough and intensity was needed in his eyes.
Goldstein was dropped last week with no questions asked.
Once you establish a soft culture, a culture that says talent alone is enough, it takes years of brutal work to root it out.
Melbourne have that culture, and a soft-possession forward of a key position forward in Jack Watts is an essential part of it.
As I've said, I wouldnt have him at my club for nothing.
He is 21 FFS, do you honestly believe that he'll always be like this?
I'll hold judgement until he returns.
Wasn't Hawkins trialled in the ruck and around the forward line, essentially told to get out of Pods' way?
It means that his form has been dropping slightly, and that intensity has been dropping majorly.
So let's recap, he's been consistently good!
But his forms been dropping "slightly"....
But he's still been consistently good!
But in bad enough form to be dropped.....
But he's still been consistently good!
So I ask again, how can one be rated as "consistently good" if their form is dropping to a point where they get dropped? Either what's being perceived as "consistently good" isn't actually what's happening or the benchmark for "consistently good" isn't what it used to be
I'll answer that - he hasn't been consistently good. Melbourne fans sem to think he has been but he has one good game, a few decent ones and some poor ones. He will bounce back and I believe Neeld is the man to get the best out of him but he deserved to be dropped this week.
Packet of French Fries and sauce.
There has been no question mark over his workrate at all, why make things up? Are you trying to make your argument look better?
Mate, most of such claims about Watts are invariably made up.
The new Melbourne coach questioned Watts' appetite for hard work in a Herald Sun interview in November, but the No.1 draft pick has welcomed the wake-up call.
You'll never find me in a corner claiming that Wattsy is a star, I just see potential in the way he plays and can see why we're dropping him.