- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,555
- 29,452
- AFL Club
- West Coast
I don't see how we could rest cox. We don't have anyone to replace him with.
Wouldn't be surprised if Blicavs is dropped though.
Wouldn't be surprised if Blicavs is dropped though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Every time in the last 2 seasons when we play gold coast or, last year, GWS as well, people say Cox will be rested. And it is yet to happen.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Would hurt my dreamteam but Cox out and Dick in would be quite funny!
Someone please give me an answer.
I only really have two options this round (hoping Gibbs plays)
O'Meara -> Fyfe
Thomas -> Mayes
Putting my cash to $36k and starting Macaffer and Mayes as E
or
Viney -> Thurlow with Gibbs put into the middle
Thomas -> Franklin
Putting $129k in the bank, giving me the option to upgrade someone next week. Thurlow or Terlich to start?
Then Downgrading Swan if he doesn't improve this week, giving me more cash & upgrading Macaffer/Dwyer
Thanks for the feedback mate, much appreciate. I see your point with Swan. What about giving him up for someone like an Ablett? Thoughts on somehow getting Harvey into my side?I personally wouldn't be trading out O'Meara yet... His BE is 56, And he's scored more than that in every game so far bar one... He's playing pretty decently and almost averaging 100 over the last 3 weeks, I'd give him 1 - 2 more weeks, And then get rid of him... If he scores 70+ he'll go up another 6k.
IF O'Meara scores less than 60 this round then get rid of him.
End of Round 10 I would think O'Meara will start hitting his peak, and start dropping a bit. But I personally like the way the kids playing and would rather hold for a breakout 130 score for a week or two.
Getting rid of Swan is just such a backwards decision, It's freaking Dane Swan for christ sake! He could score 90,92,95 then go boom with a 170, Do you want to risk that high scoring game ? I sure wouldn't! It'd cost you a close round not having Swan for a game like that.
Swan still has the 4th best AVG in the comp right now, 109, 111, 90 aren't bad scores at all.. dropped under 100 once this year... If you can find a better averaging player that will go the whole year with Swan then go for it... But terrible decision IMO.
I don't see how we could rest cox. We don't have anyone to replace him with.
What happened to that Lycett character
Neade is going to be rested this weekend. Yaaayyyyyyy - no price drop while I make other trades.
Started without Swan and am waiting until after R13 to pick him up. Working out so far with him dropping over 100k already.