Unofficial Preview Qualifying Final v Hawthorn
- Thread starter grimlock
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Agreed,all 4 had a good game. Would like to see Pyke pushed more into defence,to help out against Roughy and Hale. And possibly Tippett moved into the ruck for a while,could work?
BLOODsMAGIC
Team Captain
- Aug 12, 2013
- 477
- 212
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Banned
- #303
It's truly a joy to read the hawks posters sooking, truly is! Now lets make them hurt even more bloods!
RW
Cancelled
10k Posts
Sydney Forum Service Medal
Sydney Swans - Jake Lloyd 2020 Player Sponsor
BeanCoiNFT Investor
Sydney Swans - Harry Cunningham 2019 Player Sponsor
Ex-Moderator
Sydney Swans - Gary Rohan Player Sponsor 2018
Sydney Swans - George Hewett Player Sponsor 2017
Sydney Swans - Callum Mills Player Sponsor 2016
Podcaster
- Jan 11, 2003
- 16,283
- 19,093
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Beat you to it
I can always delete your post to make it look like I got in first
Full MRP report here --> http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-09-02/mrp-full-statement-round-23
I see that they graded the impact as medium despite the medical report giving Malceski the all clear. I thought it was probably always a medium impact bump anyway regardless of the effect on the player.
'Low impact' seems more for things like Hall's 'love tap' on Maguire, which really just winded the player more than anything because of where he made contact.
- Jul 13, 2008
- 4,524
- 3,510
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
ahh Hawthorn fans.
I should have known who
If they can get it down from medium to low, which I'd have to think is possible given Malceski played on without hassle, I think there is a big chance they will go for it. Of course I have no idea what is in the medical report.
BLOODsMAGIC
Team Captain
- Aug 12, 2013
- 477
- 212
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Banned
- #311
They would only challenge if they were told too, I hope it stands because for once the system has got it spot on.
- Nov 11, 2012
- 34,922
- 40,975
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I was just saying whats your problem
Bonz
🤺🤺🤺
I can always delete your post to make it look like I got in first
And I could always break into your house and watch you when you sleep but you don't see me doing that
In all seriousness though this suspension is huge for our chances this weekend!!!
Swan Dive
Team Captain
- Sep 10, 2012
- 467
- 172
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Hawthorn have got a pretty good record without Buddy. They don't need him to win, but he's great at generating excitement and electrifying the crowd. At least we won't have to deal with that.
baja
Premiership Player
hehe can I answer this one?
MarkP
That guy
Oh I listen to him.
I also read Bob Ellis and his blog.
It is always good to take notice of the delusional for they give you endless amounts of joy and frivolity.
Should've been classed as reckless, and probably should've been low impact.
The AFL do like their stars out there in finals, dare it be said they've probably swapped those 2 gradings around so a challenge will be successful. This isn't over by a long shot, they'll contest the charge.
Must be nice to have a man inside AFL HQ , and they dare call us love-childs.
They can be beaten with or without Buddy, it's all on the Midfield this week they need a good game and can't let them get too many simple centre clearances again. They also need to feed our forward with passes to advantage and be smart going forward.
The AFL do like their stars out there in finals, dare it be said they've probably swapped those 2 gradings around so a challenge will be successful. This isn't over by a long shot, they'll contest the charge.
Must be nice to have a man inside AFL HQ
, and they dare call us love-childs.They can be beaten with or without Buddy, it's all on the Midfield this week they need a good game and can't let them get too many simple centre clearances again. They also need to feed our forward with passes to advantage and be smart going forward.
MarkP
That guy
Seems a fair result to me for the "bump".
The only issue now is if the arrogant filth happen to beat us without the cheating, sniping flog then they will be even more insufferable than normal. Which is to say I will have to take extra care to ignore the filth than usual. No biggie I guess.
Still this frees up Ted to play on Roughie and lets Grundy go to Hale/Bailey I would imagine.
Makes our job a mile easier.
In short this is more of a bonus to us than a detriment to them (no I don't mean they are "better" without Buddy).
Freeing our best back-man up to their most potent forward is a godsend for us.
The only issue now is if the arrogant filth happen to beat us without the cheating, sniping flog then they will be even more insufferable than normal. Which is to say I will have to take extra care to ignore the filth than usual. No biggie I guess.
Still this frees up Ted to play on Roughie and lets Grundy go to Hale/Bailey I would imagine.
Makes our job a mile easier.
In short this is more of a bonus to us than a detriment to them (no I don't mean they are "better" without Buddy).
Freeing our best back-man up to their most potent forward is a godsend for us.
Exactly Jack2Jack.
This is all set up beautifully Hawks will contest and argue it was low impact and not medium therefor plead guilty to that and Buddy will be free to play.
A lot easier to bargain down than reckless to negligent
This is all set up beautifully Hawks will contest and argue it was low impact and not medium therefor plead guilty to that and Buddy will be free to play.
A lot easier to bargain down than reckless to negligent
Not enough bouffant for his his and BT's liking
- Nov 11, 2012
- 34,922
- 40,975
- AFL Club
- Sydney
They will contest like u say and will most likely playExactly Jack2Jack.
This is all set up beautifully Hawks will contest and argue it was low impact and not medium therefor plead guilty to that and Buddy will be free to play.
A lot easier to bargain down than reckless to negligent
The King!
Chosen One
You probably got my tickets!!! Logged in dead on 9.00am. Selected tickets confirmed only to see the dreaded error message. Was offered M6 R1-2. After another 26 minutes of auto queue got a second crack at it. Funnily enough, offered the same bay but Row Q. Guess I nicked some poor bastards ticket that also got shut out.
- Status
Similar threads
