Dane Swan

[Jhye Clark 13]

Hahaha FFS

So your saying Stanton's first quarter stats are made up or Essendon didn't have a big lead. This taking into account that Swan was his direct opponent.

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

Stats ahahaha, only rivalled by Ablett on stats over the last 7 years or so. But don't let facts get in the way of YOUR story.

That's my point. The reason he's overrated.

 

[Mick98]

So your saying Stanton's first quarter stats are made up or Essendon didn't have a big lead. This taking into account that Swan was his direct opponent.

Who cares about his first quarter!

tell us about where he was when the game was there to be won?

Because Swan was there.

 

[SuperSub17]

Which was? I know you're a one-eyed Pies supporter in denial, but even a member of your clubs staff agrees with me.

Really? They said he is as overrated as they come?

 

[SuperSub17]

So your saying Stanton's first quarter stats are made up or Essendon didn't have a big lead. This taking into account that Swan was his direct opponent.

So what about the rest of the game then?

Or would you prefer to keep cherry-picking your stats to suit your argument?

 

[Mateyman]

That's my point. The reason he's overrated.

Well, given you said

Let's not let stats interfere with your rating though.

You have a funny way of using the English language

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

Who cares about his first quarter!

tell us about where he was when the game was there to be won?

Because Swan was there.

Yes when Colingwood were on roll. Where was he in your 2 losses this season? Did his opponent dominate yet again?

 

[bradrowe#32]

Sometimes one needs to take into account all aspects of the game and close the stat browser.

What's his DE for this season?

He wins us games of football and has done for a very long time. Everything us else is irrelevant.

 

[SuperSub17]

Yes when Colingwood were on roll. Where was he in your 2 losses this season? Did his opponent dominate yet again?

More cherry picking.

 

[September Action]

Which was? I know you're a one-eyed Pies supporter in denial, but even a member of your clubs staff agrees with me.

And one of your Premiership captains voted him the Anzac Day medallist yesterday. Go figure.

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

Well, given you said

You have a funny way of using the English language

You need to learn comprehension. You're rating Swan off the back of what I accuse people to rate him from....stats alone.

 

[Mick98]

Yes when Colingwood were on roll. Where was he in your 2 losses this season? Did his opponent dominate yet again?

Just winding up and trolling the likes of you

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

More cherry picking.

Did he play well in your 2 losses? Simple question.

 

[SuperSub17]

You need to learn comprehension. You're rating Swan off the back of what I accuse people to rate him from....stats alone.

What about his Brownlow then?

 

[Mateyman]

What's his DE for this season?

His DE has been within 2-3% of Ablett every completed season since 2010.
He, in fact, has more effective disposals than him since 2007 or something.
Inb4 you now say DE is worthless having used it to try and degrade Swan

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

Just winding up and trolling the likes of you

In other words no good.

 

[SuperSub17]

Did he play well in your 2 losses? Simple question.

You realise he was injured and underdone, right?

I said this on the first page:

He's just underdone at the moment, in a few weeks he'll be fine.

Now that he's dominated the last few weeks I think you'll find I was right.

 

[Mateyman]

What about his Brownlow then?

Nahnahnahnahnahnah SWAN IZZZZZZ SHIIITTTT

 

[Mick98]

In other words no good.

No.

you seem upset.

 

[Mateyman]

You need to learn comprehension. You're rating Swan off the back of what I accuse people to rate him from....stats alone.

Saying

Yet the opposition refuse to tag him. Funny that, and one must wonder why when he turns the ball over and his direct opponent keeps influencing the contest.

He runs one way and one way only, made to look good when the Pies are playing well.

Let's not let stats interfere with your rating though.

Makes no sense if that's what you were trying to say.

 

[September Action]

Did he play well in your 2 losses? Simple question.

He did have a couple of off matches. You're right; he's a hack.
/Thread

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

Saying

Makes no sense if that's what you were trying to say.

Of course it does. All it means is that his rated on pure stat numbers alone.

It really wasn't that hard to comprehend. Considering someone else liked your post, that makes 2 of you with comprehension issues.

 

[worthy]

You need to learn comprehension. You're rating Swan off the back of what I accuse people to rate him from....stats alone.

What are you doing? A player has a great game, and after a slow start to the year is now playing really good footy, plays a big role in his teams win, and you're on here doing what? Christ I hope you're only about 12, because if you're older than that you should be really embarrassed.

 

[bradrowe#32]

Yes when Colingwood were on roll. Where was he in your 2 losses this season? Did his opponent dominate yet again?

He was poor and he admitted that himself. You're happy to condemn his poor performances, but why don't you follow Dane's example and acknowledge his brilliant performances for the last seven or so years?

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

He did have a couple of off matches. You're right; he's a hack.
/Thread

When did I say he was a hack. He's as overrated as they come though. Good player but not elite, due to his lack of accountability for his opponent, and his woeful disposal. Rated based on quantity of disposals.