Remove this Banner Ad

Game Day Crows v Dogs

Who do you think will win?


  • Total voters
    52
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I feel like I've stepped into an episode of "The Real Housewives of West Lakes"

Was at Fork In The Road today and didn't get to see the telecast. Our Foxtel IQ2 box hard drive failed Thursday night, so we lost the ability to record things. I have a set-top box for normal digital TV in the man-cave and had to learn to record with it today; a USB stick was stuck in it and I got half the match. Doesn't sound like it's worth watching.
 
I feel like I've stepped into an episode of "The Real Housewives of West Lakes"

Was at Fork In The Road today and didn't get to see the telecast. Our Foxtel IQ2 box hard drive failed Thursday night, so we lost the ability to record things. I have a set-top box for normal digital TV in the man-cave and had to learn to record with it today; a USB stick was stuck in it and I got half the match. Doesn't sound like it's worth watching.
Wrong. Watch it.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Recap of today's game I think there is encorouging signs. I love the crows when they get the ball on the run they are so good with runners like smith, Dangerfield, Sloane, Mackay, jaensch, wright etc

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
Oh and I forgot walker and otten due to return next week or the week after.

Can't wait I know we only played the bulldogs but interesting fact shows port haven't beat them since 2005

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
I feel like I've stepped into an episode of "The Real Housewives of West Lakes"

Was at Fork In The Road today and didn't get to see the telecast. Our Foxtel IQ2 box hard drive failed Thursday night, so we lost the ability to record things. I have a set-top box for normal digital TV in the man-cave and had to learn to record with it today; a USB stick was stuck in it and I got half the match. Doesn't sound like it's worth watching.

Spoiler alert....we won.

Therefore, they are the ones to watch. It's not a classic but still a good game.
 
Otto needs to get a kick first

Andy Otten was given a specific role to play Friday night. I think they played him in that position to make a direct judgement between him and Sam Shaw.

If he played in the midfield or as the lose man, you would be correct but since he was given a direct defensive assignment, possession count I don't feel was relevant.
 
Bloody thought they were going to give us a repeat of the 2013 game when we versed them. The saviour for me today was the Jpod he was terrific

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
Andy Otten was given a specific role to play Friday night. I think they played him in that position to make a direct judgement between him and Sam Shaw.

If he played in the midfield or as the lose man, you would be correct but since he was given a direct defensive assignment, possession count I don't feel was relevant.

Alex regardless of role 10 touches at sanfl level against the bottom side is simply not good enough for AFL selection
 
Alex regardless of role 10 touches at sanfl level against the bottom side is simply not good enough for AFL selection

Each to their own, I just don't think that was part of the criteria they were judging his game on this week.

But that then opens another can of worms about the integrity of the team and game. But that's a different discussion in a different thread.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Each to their own, I just don't think that was part of the criteria they were judging his game on this week.

But that then opens another can of worms about the integrity of the team and game. But that's a different discussion in a different thread.

Bring otten and walker back and for starters who cares if otten only got 10 touches he a extra tall in our defence or forward line.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
Bring otten and walker back and for starters who cares if otten only got 10 touches he a extra tall in our defence or forward line.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

I wasn't advocating bring Otten back. I'm a fan of Sam Shaw and think he's done ok.

If he is injured, then yes Otten is the next cab out of the rank.
 
Bring otten and walker back and for starters who cares if otten only got 10 touches he a extra tall in our defence or forward line.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
The issue for otten is has he regained his touch rather than number of touches. Usually slow to come back from injury.
 
Bring otten and walker back and for starters who cares if otten only got 10 touches he a extra tall in our defence or forward line.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
not about the number of touches, it was about his complete inability to defend against a journeyman SANFL forward.

fortunately I was there and hopefully so were many of the people making the selection decisions, because as much as I like Otten he isn't ready to come into the side.
 
Re otten in the reserves I think it comes down to whether or not he is clear best 22 returning from injury or actually fighting for a spot. If he's fighting for a spot then by all means judge him on ressies form. If he's best 22 getting match fit then who gives a **** if his form isn't great. He gets up to match fitness and plays. If tex played his 2 sanfl games and played terribly barely touching the pill would we make him earn his spot or bring him back when we feels he's match ready for afl. (Clearly tex and Otto are 2 different beasts with one being an absolute star player but I think the general point stands.) The key is that our selection panel need to have a clear answer to that question when it comes to every player on the list and I really don't think they do.
 
I watched the game, that's how I knew Reilly has plenty of shanks and errors.

You just chose to stop at half time as it became too hard to defend Reilly.

Too hard to defend. Once again you are talking absolute bullshit... There is no other way to call what you are saying other than Bullshit.

Reilly had "plenty of shanks and errors". Thats an awesome statement if you forget about the fact that he was 3rd most efficient user of the football on the ground with a DE of over 90%.

He was the 5th highest possession getter in our side with 21. He had the equal most kicks of an Adelaide Crow in a handball happy side. He had a total of 4 clangers in the game (2 of those were free kicks against) so basically 2 of his 15 kicks didn't hit the target (and both of these were under pressure on the HFF wing and didn't hurt us).

I just cannot see why he would need defending. Here is where he ranked amongst Crows. Equal 1st in marks, 2nd most contested marks, 2nd in Rebound 50's, Equal 6th in most tackles, Equal 6th in 1%ers, Top 3 in DE%, 5th most possessions.

Alex - you and your army of Reilly haters in this thread - please tell me what he did wrong today. Why should he be dropped?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I feel like I've stepped into an episode of "The Real Housewives of West Lakes"

Was at Fork In The Road today and didn't get to see the telecast. Our Foxtel IQ2 box hard drive failed Thursday night, so we lost the ability to record things. I have a set-top box for normal digital TV in the man-cave and had to learn to record with it today; a USB stick was stuck in it and I got half the match. Doesn't sound like it's worth watching.
Bits and pieces were worth watching but overall it was a pretty ugly game.

I was at Fork today too, but we went in early and left at 12:30 to be back for the start of the game.
 
afc9798

Do you know the cartoon Charlie Brown?

Whenever I read your tripe, all I that hear is the teacher talking "waccc waccc waccc"

And once again - you can offer nothing to a discussion other than a stupid statement with absolutely nothing to back it up.

Every single bloody thread - you throw out bullshit statements that are 100% incorrect. When others refute these ludicrous ramblings with stats that disprove your argument you resort to petty posts like the above. Now to be clear - Stats aren't the be all and end all, but are useful to back up an argument.

How about instead of crying and bitching for 2 days about extended benches on a thursday night - you actually watch some football so you can actually have an educated opinion of Aussie Rules. This is of course assuming you actually watched the game today? (considering you were throwing another tantrum on here about not watching because the roof was open)...
 
afc9798

Do you know the cartoon Charlie Brown?

Whenever I read your tripe, all I that hear is the teacher talking "waccc waccc waccc"
Alex you tagged the wrong poster ... & do you need to persist with this personal shyte. Sometimes just best to walk away...

PS. Same goes for both parties. Seriously, the board doesn't want to read this ongoing trash.
 
Waffle

I'm havering waffles fir breakfast tomorrow. :thumbsu:

Once again a brilliant conversation from you. I thought this forum was about discussing football?

Obviously you think this forum is about throwing out incorrect bullshit and then being a little child when proven 100% wrong. What is this - conversation number 6 where you just end up deflecting?

Stop being such a sniveling little brat. If you can't stand by and discuss your stupid ramblings - then don't make them. Simple.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Game Day Crows v Dogs

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top