Keep digging. No continuity? He was suspended for 3 weeks, not 3 months. And it's not like he was injured so he couldn't train.
Meanwhile, the player in question gets 25 disposals, 7 marks, 3 tackles, 7 clearances, 4 inside 50s, 1 rebound 50 and 2 goals. Should be at least second best on ground to go with the two 3rd bests and 1 2nd best he already has gathered in the past four games. He had a better game than Ah Chee did. But hey, he's the very definition of vanilla, right?
Perhaps leave the list decisions until everyone has had the same opportunities as Young has had and stop making judgement calls on who will or will not be delisted. One year on Young's contract isn't going to be the difference between the club retaining him over Moore - they'll just demote him to the rookie list and he might decide to walk if he doesn't get traded.
Now we're just going in circles. The fact is Moore has missed a lot of footy this year through injury, suspension, and a poorly timed bye. While the coaching staff might be prepared to rush Wines back after a layoff they probably want the 22nd guy selected to be in a sustained period of form. Something Moore hasn't been able to show this season until now.
We're at the midpoint of an incredibly disappointing season this is the perfect time to make a list of likely delistings. Jason Cripps would be doing the same.
As for the Moore vs Young argument, well there's really not much in it in my opinion. Young might be a touch quicker and a touch more dangerous forward so the puts him a little ahead for mine but still deservedly under the pump. At the end of the day the reality is we don't need all three of Moore, Young and Ah Chee.




