News New Jumpers for 2016

[magic_johnson!]

They probably wanted the numbers on a solid background, which would have meant the red hoop stopped, and figured that it'd look silly to keep the other two going.

Plus the "historical" element of the hoops not going all the way around is preserved

Toyota placement though could have been sooo much better

 

[hitthepost]

Toyota placement though could have been sooo much better

In what way? It's in the normal spot.
If the hoops continued all the way around and it was half on yellow, half on blue, then yes. But it's fully on white.

 

[dylancox08]

Absolutely Atrocious design from BLK.

 

[Roo Beauty]

The fuq

 

[SwampCreature]

The goggles, they do nothing

 

[Fizzler]

If you thought the Ritzfoy logo looked good, (name changed to stop LoyRion from searching it) you'll understand why we hate it.

 

[Groupie_]

Absolutely Atrocious design from BLK.View attachment 202419

why is the luon eating vero

 

[Andonis1997]

If you thought the Ritzfoy logo looked good, (name changed to stop LoyRion from searching it) you'll understand why we hate it.

We hate it? I think you're on your own there, buddy.

A similar updated version wouldn't go astray but if you'd prefer the paddlepop, you're exactly who the Lions were pandering to.

 

[Ned_Flanders]

Absolutely Atrocious design from BLK.View attachment 202419

That burnt my retinas

 

[Fizzler]

We hate it? I think you're on your own there, buddy.

A similar updated version wouldn't go astray but if you'd prefer the paddlepop, you're exactly who the Lions were pandering to.

An updated version would look good. Not something completely different like the paddle pop.

 

[TheLoungeLizard]

I like their intentions...

 

[Groupie_]

looks like something rfctiger74 would wear to a wedding

 

[Ned_Flanders]

looks like something rfctiger74 would wear to a wedding

Hey nothing will ever replace my burgundy crushed velvet suit

 

[NM_Mitchell]

Absolutely Atrocious design from BLK.View attachment 202419

Not bad

 

[Dean1]

In what way? It's in the normal spot.
If the hoops continued all the way around and it was half on yellow, half on blue, then yes. But it's fully on white.

All 3hoops all the way round and toyota logo underneath the hoops is an idea. Don't know if that would leave enough room for numbers

 

[Fizzler]

All 3hoops all the way round and toyota logo underneath the hoops is an idea. Don't know if that would leave enough room for numbers

It's just them putting it in the league standard position. I don't think the AFL will change their rules for 1 club.

 

[TheLoungeLizard]

Obvious answer is make the hoops full and put the Toyota logo in a white box over the hoops isn't it?

 

[NM_Mitchell]

It's just them putting it in the league standard position. I don't think the AFL will change their rules for 1 club.

 

[Dylan8]

If you thought the Ritzfoy logo looked good, (name changed to stop LoyRion from searching it) you'll understand why we hate it.

Speak for yourself

 

[Mr Eagle]

Absolutely Atrocious design from BLK.View attachment 202419

Wouldn't mind it, but for the impact of the sponsor position.

 

[jroam82]

Retails are unlikely to be regulated in such a way.

It's the player issue versions I'd expect to have more stringent requirements.

That said, some clubs have things on the back of the neck pushing the numbers down a bit.

(I'm not saying I think regulation is a thing - just that retails won't be the way to demonstrate it)

 

[NM_Mitchell]

Retails are unlikely to be regulated in such a way.

It's the player issue versions I'd expect to have more stringent requirements.

That said, some clubs have things on the back of the neck pushing the numbers down a bit.

(I'm not saying I think regulation is a thing - just that retails won't be the way to demonstrate it)

The PI also had the sponsor down low.

 

[Fizzler]

Retails are unlikely to be regulated in such a way.

It's the player issue versions I'd expect to have more stringent requirements.

That said, some clubs have things on the back of the neck pushing the numbers down a bit.

(I'm not saying I think regulation is a thing - just that retails won't be the way to demonstrate it)

Numbers were pushed down for North, Brisbane and GC. This was most likely due to the fact that these teams all thought there would be names on jumpers.

 

[Gibbsy]

Wouldn't mind it, but for the impact of the sponsor position.

You can't even make out the lion because the sponsor obscures the most important part of the graphic. It also highlights how poor the Fitzroy lion looks at large sizes... all those little squiggles and curves that remain for no good reason. I don't want a move to a lesser, inferior logo, but just a clean-up – it's a divisive issue on this board but I always liked the Costa lion.

 

[Gibbsy]

Numbers were pushed down for North, Brisbane and GC. This was most likely due to the fact that these teams all thought there would be names on jumpers.

Haha, this old chestnut. If it's all sublimated then how can that theory be possible? Why would BLK move numbers down for Brisbane and Gold Coast but not Richmond or one of their other teams? It just doesn't make sense; the only thing I put it down to is lazy and poor designing.