TradeDraft
Post-Human
Suprise we took Daicos before our last pick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Apparently we had to take him because we can't fit anyone else in due to salary cap.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Just repeating what SEN said.Doubt That
I meant what I said it meant - that the last player we picked who had dropped in the order because of injury (although it had 'nada' to do with his current one) had not yet paid off for us.The point you were making was that it was yet to pay off, imho linking an injured low ranking players and success rate. Anyway let's see how he goes. In a way more exciting and something to look forward to.
Yeah calling that as garbage. We can fit another player in, we're sticking to 95% this year though.Just repeating what SEN said.
Why not take Scharenberg?
We are preserving salary cap.Why not take Scharenberg?
We'll go into next year with 39 on the senior list, this means we can take an additional rookie (5 instead of 4). Cox will remain a Cat B rookie and will be promoted to the 40th senior list spot in the preseason. The benefit of doing it this way is that only half of Cox's salary counts against the cap.Really? Unless there are restrictions for cat B rookies - no idea why we would do that? Cox is a free list spot at the moment (not sure if that has implications cap-wise)
Thought he would fit right in thenCan't Kick