Chief
~ Shmalpha ~
- Admin
- #476
....and when (footy) journalists obtain private information using illegal sources, no one says a word or wants to hold an enquiry.
Could you elaborate?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
....and when (footy) journalists obtain private information using illegal sources, no one says a word or wants to hold an enquiry.
I'd suggest there's a bit of a difference between a footy journalist, and a minister of state releasing private information in order to discredit someone.....and when (footy) journalists obtain private information using illegal sources, no one says a word or wants to hold an enquiry.
So Andie Fox was found to have lied about her dealings with Centrelink and doesn't like it. Then Labor uses an aboriginal MP to put in a complaint as they know that the government only has a one seat majority in the lower house. Surprise, surprise.If true he should be bounced out of parliament and face and charges.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-02/politics-live-march-2/8315480
Politics Live: Human Services Minister referred to federal police over Centrelink disclosure
BY POLITICAL REPORTER STEPHANIE ANDERSON
Email Facebook Twitter WhatsApp
Labor MP Linda Burney has referred Human Services Minister Alan Tudge to the Australian Federal Police after confirmation his department gave a Centrelink client's personal information to a journalist.
Mr Tudge and his department claimed the disclosure was legal according to section 202 of the Social Security Act 1999 and section 162 of the A New Tax System Family Administration Act 1999.
Wow long stretch and really disappointed that you label a MP by her background. Shame on you, what is the relevance?So Andie Fox was found to have lied about her dealings with Centrelink and doesn't like it. Then Labor uses an aboriginal MP to put in a complaint as they know that the government only has a one seat majority in the lower house. Surprise, surprise.
I think he would prefer that over TasmanianWow long stretch and really disappointed that you label a MP by her background. Shame on you, what is the relevance?
Would you say the German MP for Abetz or Cormann?
Labor wanted to put her in the spotlight. It is the Labor way.Wow long stretch and really disappointed that you label a MP by her background. Shame on you, what is the relevance?
Would you say the German MP for Abetz or Cormann?
Wow long stretch and really disappointed that you label a MP by her background. Shame on you, what is the relevance?
Would you say the German MP for Abetz or Cormann?
Was she elected because of her background and celebrated for it or was she criticised for her background?We're you this outraged when she was elected and everyman and his dog were labelling her by her background?
Was she elected because of her background and celebrated for it or was she criticised for her background?
Anyway if it was in the Murdoch media didn't read it. Leave that to others who need to be told how to think.
Usually the source hasn't been authorised by the government to release the private information to a journalist. Lets be clear the journalists aren't (usually) breaking any laws it is the sources that are doing the illegal activity.....and when (footy) journalists obtain private information using illegal sources, no one says a word or wants to hold an enquiry.
Remote work-for-the-dole participants hit with 55,000 fines in three months
By political reporter Dan Conifer
Nearly 55,000 fines were issued to remote work-for-the-dole participants in just three months, a Senate committee has heard.
The Community Development Programme (CDP) covers about 35,000 people, the vast majority of whom are Aboriginal.
Participants must work 25 hours a week to receive their unemployment benefits - up to three times longer than other unemployed people.
Yep
Time to privatise Centrelink. There is no reason a government body should run administration, especially if they can't do it properly
One of the more ridiculous suggestions I've heard. Essential services should not be at the whim of private corporations and last time I checked, welfare was an essential service. Putting it in private hands would put us on track to join America in their own private dystopia.Yep
Time to privatise Centrelink. There is no reason a government body should run administration, especially if they can't do it properly
Yep
Time to privatise Centrelink. There is no reason a government body should run administration, especially if they can't do it properly
One of the more ridiculous suggestions I've heard. Essential services should not be at the whim of private corporations and last time I checked, welfare was an essential service. Putting it in private hands would put us on track to join America in their own private dystopia.