Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[exe ex machina]

Tracking of far away objects beyond the supposed curvature of the earth.

 

[Nothing]

On this plate, Perth and Chile are diametrically opposed and about as far apart as you can get (except the Antarctic "Ice Wall"). Perth to Chile (SCL - Santiago precisely) has flights via Sydney with air time of 16 hours. It should also include the flight path passing over (or close to North America).
Meanwhile Perth to Tokyo is 13 hours flight time and doesn't even get to the "hub". So Tokyo to Chile should only be a few hours?

Tokyo to SCL is 22 hours VIA SYDNEY. Why are we flying BACK to Sydney to get to Chile? OK, we'll try a different airline. Clearly QANTAS aren't a good airline and warp time and space. How about we fly the "right" way and go via North America. We'll fly to Toronto in Air Canada, we'd be passing over the top of it normally. Here, we once again end up with a flight time of 22 hours.

 

[exe ex machina]

If only you guys watched some of those hefty videos I post, where they get into the nitty gritty of science, not dark music and stupid satanic talk. But where they dive right in. Theres so much interesting science observation data etc that would be good to have you guys discuss

 

[Procrastinator35]

See "Hubble does not exist" thread.
Satellites is apparently a contentious reality. GPS for instance all ground based tower networks. Eg, they say, why in regions you don't good signals because the distance between towers is further in more remote areas. But if there were thousands of satellites then there should never be consistent loss of signals in remote areas.

Theres also a quote from a military guy somewhere in this thread, who said earth is flat because radio signal tracking cannot function with a spherical earth.

We can see all the other planets rotating 360 degrees upon their axis, as they orbit the sun, with our super telescopes....Why would the earth be any different?

There's also the phases of the moon with regards earth's shadow.

The Levi-Schumacher has also taken Earth pictures which demonstrates it's spherical nature, orbit & spinning motion.

Flatties are stuck on the notion of perspectivism....The fact we can't be in 2 places at once.

 

[exe ex machina]

We can see all the other planets rotating 360 degrees upon their axis, as they orbit the sun, with our super telescopes....Why would the earth be any different?

There's also the phases of the moon with regards earth's shadow.

The Levi-Schumacher has also taken Earth pictures which demonstrates it's spherical nature, orbit & spinning motion.

Flatties are stuck on the notion of perspectivism....The fact we can't be in 2 places at once.

If you watch some of those videos ive asked people to watch, you'll see one video about how planets are not actually planets but stars. High res telescopic footage of Venus or Mars shows it isn't a consistent ball emitting a consistent natural light/frequency, but is a flickering dynamic entity with inconsistent light/frequency. And they show that high res comparison between a star and a planet to show they're behaving the same way. And showing how NASA's images of Mars/Venus appear utterly different to what similarly high powered civilian telescopes/cameras of Mars/Venus appear as.

Probably too hard to trawl thru pages here, maybe if you did a search for all my posts. Or search on YouTube for it with some key phrase that might locate that topic

 

[Procrastinator35]

If you watch some of those videos ive asked people to watch, you'll see one video about how planets are not actually planets but stars. High res telescopic footage of Venus or Mars shows it isn't a consistent ball emitting a consistent natural light/frequency, but is a flickering dynamic entity with inconsistent light/frequency. And they show that high res comparison between a star and a planet to show they're behaving the same way. And showing how NASA's images of Mars/Venus appear utterly different to what similarly high powered civilian telescopes/cameras of Mars/Venus appear as.

Probably too hard to trawl thru pages here, maybe if you did a search for all my posts. Or search on YouTube for it with some key phrase that might locate that topic

C'mon M8....We can see Jupiter's giant red dot as it turns....The Moon's distinctive contours & landscapes as it rotates through it's phases.

 

[exe ex machina]

Doesnt the moon only ever show one side of its face? Whose to say they aren't balls but discs all just circling around the earth like a diorama?

 

[Procrastinator35]

Doesn't the moon only ever show one side of its face? Whose to say they aren't balls but discs all just circling around the earth like a diorama?

Newton for one....Anyone with an ounce of common-sense for another.

Also, Planets don't have phases like the moon....Finally, We exist in 3 dimensions, not 2.

 

[cannot]

He may well have been all of those things, but that is still no argument against his mathematically proven theorem of planetary motion within our solar-system.

ad hominem is fallacious reasoning, as is composition dear Watson.

this is the flat earth thread, were it is imperative to attack the character of the man presenting the theories (preferably with a good spread of general abuse for good measure) before looking at the theories themselfs

newton being literal a crack pot occult original bank boss leaves us with lots of ammunition

 

[cannot]

C'mon M8....We can see Jupiter's giant red dot as it turns....The Moon's distinctive contours & landscapes as it rotates through it's phases.

dont forget this thing

 

[Total Power]

If you watch some of those videos ive asked people to watch, you'll see one video about how planets are not actually planets but stars. High res telescopic footage of Venus or Mars shows it isn't a consistent ball emitting a consistent natural light/frequency, but is a flickering dynamic entity with inconsistent light/frequency. And they show that high res comparison between a star and a planet to show they're behaving the same way. And showing how NASA's images of Mars/Venus appear utterly different to what similarly high powered civilian telescopes/cameras of Mars/Venus appear as.

Probably too hard to trawl thru pages here, maybe if you did a search for all my posts. Or search on YouTube for it with some key phrase that might locate that topic

Oh FFS, you can see this with any home telescope. Planets do not flicker, unless there is obstruction, which is only sometimes. On a clear day, i can see Mars, absolutely clearly. You either need to invest in a decent telescope or you need to stop watching flat earth vids.I have watched several of your vids and i have ripped em apart as well.

You can even watch ISS through your home telescope. Just try for once.

 

[Total Power]

dont forget this thing

what is the source of this picture? link to the site? there are plenty of other pics out there which shows the red dot turning.

 

[cannot]

what is the source of this picture? link to the site? there are plenty of other pics out there which shows the red dot turning.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/hubble-captures-vivid-auroras-in-jupiter-s-atmosphere

 

[cannot]

Oh FFS, you can see this with any home telescope. Planets do not flicker, unless there is obstruction, which is only sometimes. On a clear day, i can see Mars, absolutely clearly. You either need to invest in a decent telescope or you need to stop watching flat earth vids.I have watched several of your vids and i have ripped em apart as well.

You can even watch ISS through your home telescope. Just try for once.

yeah they do

 

[Total Power]

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/hubble-captures-vivid-auroras-in-jupiter-s-atmosphere

I didnt mean the first one, the 2nd one

Here are hubble pics

/FAIL

 

[Total Power]

yeah they do

No they dont, i see mars every month, they dont flicker, it flickers only sometimes if there is obstruction. You can buy any cheap telescope and watch it yourself.

By the way what is the ISS i am seeing then? considering we never left the earth?

and how does your gps work?

 

[exe ex machina]

"Here are the Hubble pics" lol

So gullible

 

[exe ex machina]

Procrastinator35

No point tagging Total Power because they wont watch and just say "no they dont"

 

[exe ex machina]

Also...

 

[Total Power]

"Here are the Hubble pics" lol

So gullible

Wait, so hubble doesnt exist? so pics of galaxies, stars etc are all lies? ffs, you have taken conspiracy to a whole new level.

 

[Total Power]

Procrastinator35

No point tagging Total Power because they wont watch and just say "no they dont"

Yes, best not.You quoting from flat earth websites , definitely authentic.

 

[cannot]

ah the ironing

 

[Total Power]

ah the ironing

You will not accept our sources but you will not disclose yours. If you are posting pictures, quote your source. What telescope and taken by whom and where. There are plenty of pics of jupiter, taken by chinese/russian/indian sattellites/telescopes, which shows the red dot moves as well. You do not necessarily have to believe NASA. Plenty of other sources out there not related to America
Massive fail

 

[Procrastinator35]

You will not accept our sources but you will not disclose yours. If you are posting pictures, quote your source. What telescope and taken by whom and where. There are plenty of pics of jupiter, taken by chinese/russian/indian sattellites/telescopes, which shows the red dot moves as well. You do not necessarily have to believe NASA. Plenty of other sources out there not related to America
Massive fail

Or to quote Galileo Galilee, some 500 years later: 'But it still moves'.

GG & Cannot are either attempting the biggest troll ever (my belief), or their attempting the re-inauguration of the Inquisition....LOL.

Still....Free speech n all dat.

 

[Procrastinator35]

Planets don't exist hey GG.exe?

You are officially "Off the planet."