NO TROLLS RW and KP's #offtopic Dumpsterfire

[McEvoy]

Volunteering?

**** no!!

 

[The King!]

**** no!!

He is not as ugly as you expect

#wingman

 

[McEvoy]

Go to our punting thread, Page 35 #869, then get back to me...

 

[The King!]

Go to our punting thread, Page 35 #869, then get back to me...

As his lawyer I will say he is somewhat misguided at times, but harmless

 

[McEvoy]

As his lawyer I will say he is somewhat misguided at times, but harmless

If you were his lawyer you'd advise him not to speak. How's that working out for you?!

 

[The King!]

If you were his lawyer you'd advise him not to speak. How's that working out for you?!

He is a loose cannon

 

[McEvoy]

OMG wait until he reads you've referred to him as a cannon!! I don't think miggs needs the ego boost

 

[The King!]

OMG wait until he reads you've referred to him as a cannon!! I don't think miggs needs the ego boost

Ahh well he cant hurt the king

 

[miggs]

 

[sataris]

If we go 0-22

miggs and I will make a sex tape.*

* Not with each other.

 

[Number37]

* Not with each other.

Gonna try something new are youse?

 

[miggs]

Gonna try something new are youse?

2s company 3s a party. You coming?

 

[sataris]

Gonna try something new are youse?

Every week is a week closer to release.*

* Of the tape

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

 

[Number37]

2s company 3s a party. You coming?

Pass.
MaxM might want in?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Why was my picture of Bedders holding back the dam wall deleted?

 

[Syd]

Why was my picture of Bedders holding back the dam wall deleted?

Seriously?

 

[Mick Oxlong]

Why was my picture of Bedders holding back the dam wall deleted?

I believe the word is 'dyke'...oh, that maybe why? Nom, nom, nom!

 

[bedford]

Why was my picture of Bedders holding back the dam wall deleted?

I didn't ask for it, but it had nothing to do with me. I don't even read that s**t.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

I didn't ask for it, but it had nothing to do with me. I don't even read that s**t.

Well it did. It was an illustrative gag on your efforts to manage the excitement of an AJ return and being completely overwhelmed by a few feelgood news articles. Perhaps not that funny, but at least a little bit.

 

[RW]

Well it did. It was an illustrative gag on your efforts to manage the excitement of an AJ return and being completely overwhelmed by a few feelgood news articles. Perhaps not that funny, but at least a little bit.

Apologies, my bad. It was a bit funny, but I didn't want it to take the focus away from the main topic of the thread which is AJ's progress. Probably could have let it go.

 

[bedford]

Well it did. It was an illustrative gag on your efforts to manage the excitement of an AJ return and being completely overwhelmed by a few feelgood news articles. Perhaps not that funny, but at least a little bit.

Not at all, I don't think it was needed thank you and hope you refrain from tagging me in s**t like that.

 

[Syd]

Well it did. It was an illustrative gag on your efforts to manage the excitement of an AJ return and being completely overwhelmed by a few feelgood news articles. Perhaps not that funny, but at least a little bit.

To which he replied "OFF Topic" and quoted asking why it was there.

Explanation was given but also deleted.

Expecting this exchange also to go in 3...2..

 

[bedford]

To which he replied "OFF Topic" and quoted asking why it was there.

Explanation was given but also deleted.

Expecting this exchange also to go in 3...2..

What has it got to do with you champ.

 

[RW]

Expecting this exchange also to go in 3...2..

Not at all, I gave an explanation above, which you didn't read.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Not at all, I don't think it was needed thank you and hope you refrain from tagging me in s**t like that.

You weren't tagged, you were referred to.

You'd want to maintain some pretty lily white standards yourself if you're going to get all upset by that sort of stuff.