Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
" debunked."
The more I think about it the more I agree that the naked lady must have been the shooter. The government trained a stipper into a deadly assassin - originally she was going to be used to kill the president of Micronesia however they decided to use Derek Zoolander for that hit and instead sent her to Tassie.i didnt read it all yet cause its pretty disturbing yet she came out of the b and b i think, they got it on film
whos she going to come forward to, today tonight?
The more I think about it the more I agree that the naked lady must have been the shooter. The government trained a stipper into a deadly assassin - originally she was going to be used to kill the president of Micronesia however they decided to use Derek Zoolander for that hit and instead sent her to Tassie.
If I could just find the footage of the naked stipper asssassin I could bust this case wide open.
You mean such classics as military trained marksman (debunked, his accuracy was pretty bad once he left the cafe), all headshots (debunked, a lot of the victims suffered body hits) etc etc
Try reading through the previous pages instead of just rehashing the same stuff and claiming it as fresh evidence.
read the victorian cop Andrew MacGregor dossier
your all off your **** if you think it was bryant after looking at the fats
The crime was perpetrated by US agents, as a test run to see how a mass shooting could cause citizens to renege on their rights to own firearms. It went well. Australians all gave up their rights. And so since then, the US govt has attempted to carry out the same thing on their home soil, but it failed. And failed again. And again. They kept upping the stakes (Sandy Hook false flag), little kids involved.....still nothing.
Trust me, I know all this to be true, but cannot elaborate.
Other people would also have guns and could mow him down before he was able to take hundreds hostage etc.Ponder this for a moment.
The recent Melbourne CBD incident where the guy mowed down pedestrians was done by a guy who has issues, if you had your way that same guy could have access to firearms instead.
Imagine how much worse things would have been if he had a rifle instead of a car and how much more the body count would have been.
Would you be happy with the extra people who would have died?
Other people would also have guns and could mow him down before he was able to take hundreds hostage etc.
It becomes like a cold war. Criminals and citizens. Imo things would even up more. Criminals far more adverse to attack citizens but especially carry out terrorist attacks. The people most protected by this insanity to unarm citizens are the people in power with money and government. That's WHY they're trying to disarm the world.Assuming the laws allowed people to carry firearms in public areas or even concealed.
This was also done by a US agent in attempt for the Australian government for us to give up our cars.Ponder this for a moment.
The recent Melbourne CBD incident where the guy mowed down pedestrians was done by a guy who has issues, if you had your way that same guy could have access to firearms instead.
Imagine how much worse things would have been if he had a rifle instead of a car and how much more the body count would have been.
Would you be happy with the extra people who would have died?
Lol - not less guns - more guns.Other people would also have guns and could mow him down before he was able to take hundreds hostage etc.
stick the thread up your butt
read policeman Andrew MacGregor dossier debunk that
Other people would also have guns and could mow him down before he was able to take hundreds hostage etc.
Have read these types of posts on many many different fora, yet not one person can point me to an individual , not involved in military or police , that has ever ''stepped up to the plate'' and shot a shooter down. Not one.It becomes like a cold war. Criminals and citizens. Imo things would even up more. Criminals far more adverse to attack citizens but especially carry out terrorist attacks. The people most protected by this insanity to unarm citizens are the people in power with money and government. That's WHY they're trying to disarm the world.
Have read these types of posts on many many different fora, yet not one person can point me to an individual , not involved in military or police , that has ever ''stepped up to the plate'' and shot a shooter down. Not one.
Yeah I see your problem. Whatever doesn't fit your world view you ignore and plough on regardless. Carry oni find it highly unlikely no american civilian has shot a criminal
thats beside the main point that the evidence points to Martin Bryant as not guily
Yeah I see your problem. Whatever doesn't fit your world view you ignore and plough on regardless. Carry on
Sorry GG.exe, but this is idiocy.It becomes like a cold war. Criminals and citizens. Imo things would even up more. Criminals far more adverse to attack citizens but especially carry out terrorist attacks.