pick 4 kid, 19, 25~ games already, looking like a jet.Pick 1 for Parish seems high?
plus Brissy would get a player wanting to go there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
pick 4 kid, 19, 25~ games already, looking like a jet.Pick 1 for Parish seems high?
hypotheticalCan't see Brisbane agreeing to that. Might use Port's first rounder and something else.
Parish to me is still in the untouchable basket unless we can't convince him to stay.
Possibly goes with the fact a lot of people was us to daft a forward so we can have Chooker back. Also heaps of talk about missing Ambrose. I'd say we're not as good for "quality" KPD as we could be. We would be set if we got another forward. But, It wouldn't hurt to have Hurley, Lever and Ambrose.Agree. The last player we'd be chasing.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Parish ain't leaving guys.
More chance of Mathieson coming to us then Parish going there.
Watching bits and Pieces of the Bris-GWS game on the weekend he was actually pretty impressive. After Beams went down he really stood up, ended up with a high-20s possession count I believe.Would be an interesting discussion. Wouldn't mind him as he is a younger clearance/CP type player, which we all agree we need more of.
wouldn't cost nearly as much as Martin/Fyfe and even hopper
Would our second get it done?
Averaged around 22 touches this year and Brisbane may not want to let him go depending on what happens with rockliff
Dogs, Hawks, Pies, Tigers, North, Dees.Dogs would be all over Lever surely.
I was a little baffled we didn't go for him & Balic in the second rd. vs Morgan and Redman (both of which i hadn't heard of, so felt like reaches).Watching bits and Pieces of the Bris-GWS game on the weekend he was actually pretty impressive. After Beams went down he really stood up, ended up with a high-20s possession count I believe.
EDIT: It was actually 32 touches and 6 tackles
I think they would have beenHe and Balic wouldn't have been in contention for that Morgan pick. Bonner is the one we missed out on that pisses me off.
I'm speaking specifically on type. We were never going to pick 2 of Redman/Balic/Mathieson/Clarke. It was always going to be one of those players and one of Bonner/Tucker/MorganI think they would have been
Redman/Morgan went @ 28/29. Balic and Mathieson - 38/39.
Not too far apart.
Once Francis and Parish were landed, i had hopes for 2 of Balic, Mathieson, Bonner, Tucker or Clarke.
I was really keen on Hibberd. Haven't watched any North games this year so not sure that we missed out.I think they would have been
Redman/Morgan went @ 28/29. Balic and Mathieson - 38/39.
Not too far apart.
Once Francis and Parish were landed, i had hopes for 2 of Balic, Mathieson, Bonner, Tucker or Clarke.
It was always going to be one of those players and one of Bonner/Tucker/Morgan
No, he said he was surprised that we didn't select both Mathieson and Balic. Personally I would have liked Bonner and RedmanThat's what he said.
Ah. got ya.I'm speaking specifically on type. We were never going to pick 2 of Redman/Balic/Mathieson/Clarke. It was always going to be one of those players and one of Bonner/Tucker/Morgan
Even if Hooker stays forward, we still have Hartley, Brown, Francis and Ridley.Possibly goes with the fact a lot of people was us to daft a forward so we can have Chooker back. Also heaps of talk about missing Ambrose. I'd say we're not as good for "quality" KPD as we could be. We would be set if we got another forward. But, It wouldn't hurt to have Hurley, Lever and Ambrose.
Ah. got ya.
i don't recall reading much on Redman & Morgan.
I do recall some ? on Mathieson having a bit of a rep (though its serving him well in his approach) and Bonner being a go home risk.
Tucker we missed, but Balic was probably the biggest surprise. for me anyway
i was better off not knowing that.My wife knows a close family member of Bonner and he is a massive Bombers fan and was gutted when we didn't pick him. Prior to getting drafted by Port, he couldn't stand them.
In short, very unlikely flight risk.
i was better off not knowing that.
![]()
He and Balic wouldn't have been in contention for that Morgan pick. Bonner is the one we missed out on that pisses me off.
i was better off not knowing that.
![]()